Replies: 17
| visibility 2
|
110%er [6781]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Clemson VS the Entire SEC
Jun 18, 2012, 7:48 PM
|
|
I like it. I've never been one to "join em". Beat em in every aspect in every way and give them a head start. that's what you do with people you know you can dominate. like your little brother. I take the Challenge. With all the teams that have lost their identity in the "SEC" Clemson stands with its own brand. We will rise above them all!
|
|
|
 |
Orange Elite [5571]
TigerPulse: 73%
38
Posts: 19639
Joined: 2009
|
Indeeeeed!
Jun 18, 2012, 8:07 PM
|
|
go tigers
|
|
|
|
 |
Expert [1102]
TigerPulse: 79%
26
|
I would agree, then have flashbacks to Bama at the Dome
Jun 18, 2012, 8:20 PM
|
|
It was my vietnam watching the butt whipping.
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [3014]
TigerPulse: 96%
33
|
We had no offensive line; Tommy & staff had the team soft***
Jun 18, 2012, 8:32 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-American [554]
TigerPulse: 40%
20
|
Re: We had no offensive line; Tommy & staff had the team sof
Jun 18, 2012, 9:08 PM
|
|
No offense, but you o-line was better then than it is now.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [103076]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 99024
Joined: 2009
|
Da Bears!***
Jun 18, 2012, 8:21 PM
|
|
What if it was God and da angels and da SEC vs Clemson?
Message was edited by: ClemsonTiger1988®
|
|
|
|
 |
Rooter [205]
TigerPulse: 26%
13
|
You do realize Clemson has a losing record to every team
Jun 18, 2012, 8:32 PM
|
|
in the SEC besides South Carolina, Missouri, and Miss State (1-1-1).
Since we've joined the SEC, you are only 12-8 against us. Keep that domination going. (I do realize 12-8 is on pace for the overall record, but when you look at it as 4 more wins every 20 years, it's not that bad.)
Btw, I'm using Clemson logic using the overall record, twist this any way you seem fit though. (117-167-14)
http://cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/acc/clemson/vs_conf_opponents.php?confid=177&restrictions=none
|
|
|
|
 |
Junkie [518]
TigerPulse: 90%
19
|
Re: You do realize Clemson has a losing record to every team
Jun 18, 2012, 8:43 PM
|
|
I love Clemson logic..because its fact. You do realize how pathetic you just made your "#####" look with that statement. Since you like numbers..here's a few for you..65-40-4, 63-17, 45-0..and oh yeah..10 of 12 prior to your last 3. Three in a row takes absolutely nothing away from a lifetime of domination. But then again, you don't believe in history because like all #### lovers, you were born 3 years ago. Deal with it!
|
|
|
|
 |
Rooter [205]
TigerPulse: 26%
13
|
Have you seen the Tigernet flow chart?
Jun 18, 2012, 8:49 PM
|
|
you should look it up. You are a prime example.
Congrats on being so prideful on "dominating a mediocre team for a century." How 25 more wins in 100 years is domination I'll never know. If you want domination ask Oklahoma State, down 17-82-7 to Oklahoma all time.
Care to weigh in on the other records against the SEC? Or are you content with only beating a mediocre football program?
|
|
|
|
 |
Head Coach [901]
TigerPulse: 89%
24
|
Haha, a coot calling USuC mediocre! CLASSIC!!!***
Jun 18, 2012, 8:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Zealot [868]
TigerPulse: 50%
23
|
Yea nice try but your football program is not mediocre,
Jun 18, 2012, 9:12 PM
[ in reply to Have you seen the Tigernet flow chart? ] |
|
Barely over .500 in wins, one conference title, and only five bowl wins in over 100 years. And your first bowl win came in 1995. Blows my mind how a school could go that long without winning one bowl game.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Have you seen the Tigernet flow chart?
Jun 22, 2012, 6:33 PM
[ in reply to Have you seen the Tigernet flow chart? ] |
|
so, let me get this straight. you are on a public forum, and saying " yes, you kicked our butt, but my big brothers' kicked your butts." man (if you are), that is not only pathetic, it is downright disgraceful and makes usuc look like a big wussy.
|
|
|
|
 |
Junkie [518]
TigerPulse: 90%
19
|
Re: You do realize Clemson has a losing record to every team
Jun 18, 2012, 8:46 PM
[ in reply to You do realize Clemson has a losing record to every team ] |
|
Oh btw..why don't you post usucks record against the lowly ACC on here. I'll give you a hint..its a losing record. And one against Duke that you will never catch!
|
|
|
|
 |
Trainer [37]
TigerPulse: 76%
4
|
Re: You do realize Clemson has a losing record to every team
Jun 18, 2012, 9:08 PM
[ in reply to You do realize Clemson has a losing record to every team ] |
|
Speaking of twisting...
"...when you look at it as 4 more wins every 20 years, it's not that bad..."
Still howling over that one! With defenders of TheLittleUSC's mediocrity like you, we don't even need to pile on!
Carry on.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [6781]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
thats funny right there***
Jun 22, 2012, 5:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
1st Rounder [652]
TigerPulse: 98%
21
|
Re: You do realize Clemson has a losing record to every team
Jun 18, 2012, 10:46 PM
[ in reply to You do realize Clemson has a losing record to every team ] |
|
The coots have a losing record to everyone (yes, including Duke) in the ACC except NC St, UVA and Wake Forest. So what's your point?
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2796]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: You do realize Clemson has a losing record to every team
Jun 18, 2012, 11:04 PM
[ in reply to You do realize Clemson has a losing record to every team ] |
|
There are only a couple of the teams on that list that we play with any consistency. Georgia, Auburn, Kentucky and, well, USuC. Most of the games played on that chart were well before I was born, and I'm 41. Really could care less about 2 games against Miss from 80 years ago. Or few against Vandy from 52 years ago. BTW, do you really think that if we played vandy another 3 times we would still have a losing record - USuC might.
There is one record that I do like, that is historical. It's called a National Championship. Hmmmm, I think you guys are still looking for one of those, aren't you. As I remember, you didn't even have a bowl win until, what 5 years ago?
|
|
|
|
 |
Solid Orange [1374]
TigerPulse: 95%
28
|
Re: Clemson VS the Entire SEC
Jun 18, 2012, 9:39 PM
|
|
Those are "SEC programs." Clemson is Clemson.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 2
|
|
|