|
Replies: 16
| visibility 16
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [101299]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 48721
Joined: 2009
|
What was the overall difference between Arizona & Coots?
Jun 26, 2012, 8:28 PM
|
|
Not into baseball much, but felt both had excellent pitching. So, was it hitting at clutch times being the clincher for Arizona? Go TiGERs!
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [31650]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 37006
Joined: 2000
|
Both team's starting pitching was very good.
Jun 26, 2012, 8:29 PM
|
|
AZ's hitting was just a notch above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [619]
TigerPulse: 53%
21
|
Re: Both team's starting pitching was very good.
Jun 26, 2012, 9:55 PM
|
|
Arizona was better than we were all the way around. Although our pitching was good, their's was better. We fielded pretty well; they fielded like we did in the championship series against UF last year. And there was no comparison offensively. I'm very proud of our guys for getting back to the championship series, especially given so many young players and the pressure of back to back championships. But AZ richly deserved to win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5571]
TigerPulse: 73%
38
Posts: 19639
Joined: 2009
|
Yes...Arizona had better hitting plus they are not
Jun 26, 2012, 8:43 PM
|
|
SC...thank God....Arizona has a great defense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8244]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Yes...Arizona had better hitting plus they are not
Jun 26, 2012, 8:56 PM
|
|
Arizona-pitching
cockerel's were beat by the #2 & #3 pitchers
who pitched complete games which is really not seen in
college baseball
with the #1 on the bench
cockerel's best pitcher left the game after 5 1/3 innings
ESPN announcer's stated during the game about the strike zone given to the cockerel pictures that they could be pitching again with strike zones like that, did not know why the ump had a strike zone for one team and not the same strike zone for the other
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6938]
TigerPulse: 88%
41
Posts: 22593
Joined: 2003
|
Re:Coots were good but Arizona was a cut above. They
Jun 26, 2012, 11:02 PM
|
|
would win four of five.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6938]
TigerPulse: 88%
41
Posts: 22593
Joined: 2003
|
Re:Andy Lopez is no slouch either.***
Jun 26, 2012, 11:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [59]
TigerPulse: 57%
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4098]
TigerPulse: 94%
35
Posts: 10336
Joined: 1997
|
Re: What was the overall difference between Arizona & Coots?
Jun 26, 2012, 8:51 PM
|
|
Zona clutch hits were big but when the BREAKS started going the other way the dirty c$$ts were finished!they had a great run..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22966]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 25003
Joined: 1999
|
Judging from what I saw....
Jun 26, 2012, 9:10 PM
|
|
2-0
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [70613]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 41810
Joined: 2001
|
That, and 7 runs.***
Jun 27, 2012, 12:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1489]
TigerPulse: 98%
29
|
All I know is what Mike Patrick said.
Jun 26, 2012, 9:21 PM
|
|
the coots had stud pitchers (that got out pitched) and a guy with blazing speed that never got on base.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [554]
TigerPulse: 40%
20
|
Re: What was the overall difference between Arizona & Coots?
Jun 26, 2012, 9:23 PM
|
|
Hitting. Plain and simple. Our team this year was not as good as the last two years. Just not enough consistent bats. Walker was the only guy that really worried anybody. I was actually surprised we made it back to finals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6821]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Gamecocks have low self-esteem, always have, always will...***
Jun 26, 2012, 9:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3788]
TigerPulse: 99%
35
|
DON'T FEED THE COOTS***
Jun 27, 2012, 12:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5493]
TigerPulse: 89%
38
Posts: 11946
Joined: 2001
|
Re: What was the overall difference between Arizona & Coots?
Jun 27, 2012, 1:12 PM
|
|
Score board
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [101299]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 48721
Joined: 2009
|
Thank you all...some good thoughts & comments overall ***
Jun 27, 2012, 1:23 PM
|
|
Go TiGERs!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 16
|
|
|
50
