Replies: 17
| visibility 5
|
All-TigerNet [11161]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 10900
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
 |
Rock Defender [56]
TigerPulse: 66%
6
|
ESPN recruiting rankings are for the birds***
May 15, 2014, 2:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
and television hype***
May 15, 2014, 2:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [106]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 16363
Joined: 1998
|
|
|
|
 |
Member [29]
TigerPulse: 29%
3
|
Re: I think RIVALS is the most reliable-if that's even possible
May 15, 2014, 3:03 PM
|
|
> Now, SCOUT is for the birds ...
Isnt Scout associated with ESPN for their rankings?
To be honest, 247 seems to be the best in the business for recruiting.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
247 is the best right now.
May 15, 2014, 3:17 PM
|
|
Rivals has been actually kind of horrible as of late.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3178]
TigerPulse: 81%
34
|
Maybe for national coverage but 24/7 has nothing on
May 15, 2014, 4:01 PM
|
|
Ard, Strelow, and Williams
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2600]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2600]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: I think RIVALS is the most reliable-if that's even possible
May 15, 2014, 5:37 PM
[ in reply to I think RIVALS is the most reliable-if that's even possible ] |
|
The fact that Rivals has Giella unranked and Carolina commit Blackshear ranked as a 6.1 five star tells you pretty much everything you need to know.
I saw Bluffton play twice last year and once the year before, and Blackshear wasn't even the best player on the field on any occasion.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 16363
Joined: 1998
|
Right now, agree, but I think those rankings will be changed
May 15, 2014, 6:55 PM
|
|
at some point and some players like Blackshear will be demoted.
When everything shakes out, I think Rivals will have been the most accurate overall.
That's just me ...
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [35206]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
|
Re: ESPN recruiting rankings are for the birds***
May 15, 2014, 3:04 PM
[ in reply to ESPN recruiting rankings are for the birds*** ] |
|
They don't matter? Not at all? Cause FSU has had 4 straight top 10 classes. And Auburn has been in the top 10 four of the last five years. No surprise, Alabama has had the best class four years in a row. Can you start to see how recruiting well and filling vacancies at positions with elite talent translates into winning and championships.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [105933]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 44238
Joined: 2008
|
Typical cheerleader coach focused on 4-star players
May 15, 2014, 2:22 PM
|
|
It should be 5-star or GTFO
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [11161]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 10900
Joined: 2007
|
So true. Too many skill position players.***
May 15, 2014, 2:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-American [598]
TigerPulse: 91%
20
|
Re: Wow! Nine 4* or better commits for the 2015 class.
May 15, 2014, 2:36 PM
|
|
And many, if not most, of the 3* will be 4* before long.... and some of those 4* will become 5*...
This is going to be a GREAT class.
Dabo is "BUILDING" a PROGRAM. He was never interested in having some good teams occasionally.
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [3014]
TigerPulse: 96%
33
|
Hope it doesn't stop there.***
May 15, 2014, 3:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Associate AD [810]
TigerPulse: 57%
23
|
Re: Wow! Nine 4* or better commits for the 2015 class.
May 15, 2014, 3:09 PM
|
|
Why does ESPN charge a fee for their recruiting rankings and info but Rivals is free? Is ESPN supposed have better info, is it worth it to pay for their info?
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
Because they can.***
May 15, 2014, 3:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 5
|
|
|