|
Replies: 19
| visibility 2574
|
Paw Warrior [4898]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Anti Portal guys
1
11
11
Aug 24, 2024, 3:22 PM
|
|
GTs got portal players all over that team including the QB. Just stop. It works if used correctly.
|
|
|
|
 |
Asst Coach [873]
TigerPulse: 99%
23
|
Re: Anti Portal guys
2
Aug 24, 2024, 3:23 PM
|
|
16 TP players for GT
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20552]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
Re: Anti Portal guys
1
Aug 24, 2024, 3:23 PM
|
|
17 according to On3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24158]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13640
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Anti Portal guys
2
Aug 24, 2024, 3:23 PM
|
|
GT has brought in more portal players than FSU since Brent Key was hired. 32 for GT, 29 for FSU
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1433]
TigerPulse: 100%
29
|
Re: Anti Portal guys
2
Aug 24, 2024, 3:27 PM
|
|
GT didn’t lose by 60 to UGA and still get a top 10 ranking to start the season because “portal”.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [8079]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Wondering : GT transfers rated 5* or 4* compared to FSU
1
Aug 24, 2024, 3:31 PM
[ in reply to Re: Anti Portal guys ] |
|
Talented transfers, highly rated Alabama & Georgia players just got their tails beat by Technical school full of Nerds lol.
Arguments need validity and comparing how many transfers compared to talent is useless. FSU is full of top tier talent and should beat GT easily. DJ was bad move for starters and all that talent around him did very little.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6956]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 13905
Joined: 2000
|
"works" for quick rebuilds
6
6
Aug 24, 2024, 3:24 PM
|
|
It hasn't yet "worked" to build a Champion, or dynasty
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [891]
TigerPulse: 99%
23
|
Re: "works" for quick rebuilds
1
Aug 24, 2024, 3:30 PM
|
|
Great post
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4898]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: "works" for quick rebuilds
1
Aug 24, 2024, 3:55 PM
[ in reply to "works" for quick rebuilds ] |
|
GA, BAMA, Mich, OSU, all use the portal to supplement their roster as it should be. Stop with the anti portal talk. We all love Dabo but he’s being stubborn on this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24098]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 20321
Joined: 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4999]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Anti Portal guys
2
Aug 24, 2024, 3:25 PM
|
|
Well when you're as bad as GaTech was it can't hurt
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [4078]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
But FSU should be skimming cream from the TP - GT is bottom feeding***
1
Aug 24, 2024, 3:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1395]
TigerPulse: 96%
28
|
Re: Anti Portal guys
Aug 24, 2024, 3:25 PM
|
|
Right. Imagine if we had a Haynes King at QB
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1580]
TigerPulse: 92%
30
|
Re: Anti Portal guys
Aug 24, 2024, 3:29 PM
|
|
yea imagine Dabo going to the portal to get a 3* grad transfer QB that hadn't done anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [8079]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: Anti Portal guys
Aug 24, 2024, 3:27 PM
|
|
Well since you like it you can enjoy this fact : not a single GT transfer got a sniff from FSU
You understand talent, FSU had more than 10 transfers rated at 4* or 5* while GT had how many ??
Come on, get serious with an argument before posting it on a board. You’ve proved nothing, transfer portal will always suck donkey-goobers and that’s a scientific fact
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [64426]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 18602
Joined: 2020
|
Re: Anti Portal guys
Aug 24, 2024, 3:33 PM
|
|
Haynes King?
Not a scientific fact. Smdh at you goobers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [6008]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Anti-Portal guys dont like logic***
Aug 24, 2024, 3:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11745]
TigerPulse: 98%
46
Posts: 14382
Joined: 2021
|
Re: Anti Portal guys
2
Aug 24, 2024, 3:33 PM
|
|
GA Tech beat us out for portal OL Keyon Rutledge (from Middle TN).
Rutledge is #77 and played RG for them today.
We wanted him for LT. We really wanted him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5067]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Clown comparison
Aug 24, 2024, 4:27 PM
|
|
If you lack recruiting and talent and need depth or quick starters, sure you can bring in lots of portal players. When you have talent and recruiting - it does not make sense unless there is a specific need and interest.
You portal criticizers are at least consistent (wrong, but consistent.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10247]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: Anti Portal guys
2
Aug 24, 2024, 4:29 PM
|
|
One team with highly rated portal transfers played poorly
One team with decent portal transfers played well
To try and gather anything more from what we saw today is a fools errand...sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 19
| visibility 2574
|
|
|
50
