Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
Replies: 73
| visibility 4202
|
110%er [3866]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
2
Jan 12, 2024, 8:35 AM
|
|
Jezz!!! They just signed a monster at the receiver in the portal. We are getting boat raced!
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28484]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 10513
Joined: 2013
|
because oregon boosters be like...
10
10
Jan 12, 2024, 8:41 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1588]
TigerPulse: 100%
29
|
Re: because oregon boosters be like...
1
Jan 12, 2024, 8:59 AM
|
|
Yeah, didn’t Dan Lanning say one of the reasons he’s staying at Oregon is because they are leading the way with “navigating” NIL. Doesn’t hurt when Phil Knight is on the other line. Will be fun to watch the new conferences next year.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1593]
TigerPulse: 100%
29
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20697]
TigerPulse: 85%
51
Posts: 17736
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [27]
TigerPulse: 87%
2
|
We will have a great WR group and we are also at 86 scholarships
1
11
11
Jan 12, 2024, 8:43 AM
|
|
We are not getting boat raced by anyone.
Please stop worshipping the portal like it makes teams elite. The programs which recruit mostly HS and build a program are the most successful schools today.
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [690]
TigerPulse: 90%
20
|
Re: We will have a great WR group and we are also at 86 scholarships
3
Jan 12, 2024, 8:45 AM
|
|
Sometimes you have to make tough decisions and have players compete for that scholarship. There is no argument that the transfer portal DOES NOT improve a team. Please give me some evidence on when it didn’t make a team better off
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23418]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 19961
Joined: 2011
|
LOL
7
7
Jan 12, 2024, 8:50 AM
|
|
To this point, Dabo's Clemson has not been a place where they yanked scholarships for ON the field performance. Doubt it ever will. You Whining CSers don't realize, that's how Dabo built Clemson. Once he goes against that,it tears down what makes it Family.
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [27]
TigerPulse: 87%
2
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20697]
TigerPulse: 85%
51
Posts: 17736
Joined: 2007
|
Have you had your head in the sand the last 3 years?
1
Jan 12, 2024, 10:59 AM
|
|
WR
2021 Jerreth Sterns Jameson Williams Wandale Robinson Charleston Rambo
2022 Charlie Jones Jacob Cowing Malik Heath Trey Palmer Tory Horton Isaiah Winstead
2023 Ricky White Malik Washington Tez Johnson Ja'lynn Polk Javon Baker Troy Horton Tajh Wahsington Brendan Rice Luke McCaffrey Adonai Mitchell Keon Coleman
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1802]
TigerPulse: 97%
30
|
Re: Have you had your head in the sand the last 3 years?
1
Jan 12, 2024, 11:13 AM
|
|
ok, now put the price and guarantees next to them... and how many played on a Natty team? They leave for a reason, the go places for a reason...
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [27]
TigerPulse: 87%
2
|
And? Did any of those guys make their team elite?
1
2
Jan 12, 2024, 1:04 PM
[ in reply to Have you had your head in the sand the last 3 years? ] |
|
Nobody is saying a portal QB or WR can’t make a difference, but you can be an elite program with HS players and perhaps a key spot like QB. Without a great QB, it doesn’t matter who your wide receivers are.
I’m not sure I understand what you’re trying to convey here?
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17628]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 13353
Joined: 2009
|
Technically all of our players are college players,
5
5
Jan 12, 2024, 1:31 PM
|
|
as are all of the transfers out there. That little truth seems to escape many on here who just can't help themselves in thinking that without getting talent from the portal we are somehow missing the boat.
Dabo was pretty clear that his primary duties regarding the portal lie first in keeping the talent he has in the program here. Mukuba and D Kendrick are really the only two quality guys that we've lost over this entire spell that left a bit of a hole to fill, which we already have on campus.
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [27]
TigerPulse: 87%
2
|
Yup.***
1
1
Jan 12, 2024, 2:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1995]
TigerPulse: 95%
30
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1802]
TigerPulse: 97%
30
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23418]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 19961
Joined: 2011
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3866]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [27]
TigerPulse: 87%
2
|
Had nothing at all to do with the portal or NIL
1
4
Jan 12, 2024, 10:15 AM
|
|
We lost 4 games due to crazy turnovers at critical times and a missed kick.
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7389]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 10326
Joined: 2007
|
against teams that were predominantly constructed with transfer portal players.
2
Jan 12, 2024, 10:21 AM
|
|
FSU, Miami, and Duke were brand new teams this year due to portal players. NCSU i'm not sure about.. seriously who transfers to NCSU?
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [27]
TigerPulse: 87%
2
|
FSU had Jordan Travis and missed the playoffs when he was out
1
3
Jan 12, 2024, 10:24 AM
|
|
Miami and Duke were far from elite. We lost to Miami due to untimely turnovers and a boneheaded decision by Cade to keep the ball instead or handing off as he was supposed to do.
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [428]
TigerPulse: 100%
16
|
Miami
3
Jan 12, 2024, 10:31 AM
|
|
Agreed. I hate all the "one play away...we beat ourselves" talk, but good grief. In the Miami game we fumble right before breaking the plane of the EZ and they fall on it for a turnover. They fumble going into the EZ and they fall on it for a TD... 14 points swing right there in an OT game... That doesn't even take into account the other turnover in plus territory and all the poor decisions made...
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [27]
TigerPulse: 87%
2
|
Yup***
1
1
Jan 12, 2024, 1:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7389]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 10326
Joined: 2007
|
I agree that we were the boneheads on those plays but would those teams have
Jan 12, 2024, 2:19 PM
[ in reply to FSU had Jordan Travis and missed the playoffs when he was out ] |
|
been able to string together a full game good enough to beat us without those added players. When you are overhauling your weaknesses for the better it makes you a more polished team. FSU is not undefeated without the transfer portal. Their entire defense was overhauled. Keon Coleman was their best offensive playmaker this year. It mattered in FSU's case. Mattered in Duke's case early on in the year.
Its going to be a big story going forward. SCAR doesn't beat us the year prior without transfers. Which means we would be at 9 in a row without the getting those players. How great would it have been to have Keon Coleman at WR this season?
I just don't like that we're viewed as against it. Every article i read is Clemson is failing to adapt. Thats the national narrative on Clemson and thusly I don't think players even think about us as an option.
I don't mind being frugal with it and not taking a ton of transfers like FSU does but I don't like the narrative that we're against it. Somehow Dabo and Co. need to flip that reputation and get a real quality player in the portal at some point to squelch that nonsense.
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [148]
TigerPulse: 99%
10
|
Re: I agree that we were the boneheads on those plays but would those teams have
1
Jan 14, 2024, 10:26 AM
|
|
been able to string together a full game good enough to beat us without those added players. When you are overhauling your weaknesses for the better it makes you a more polished team. FSU is not undefeated without the transfer portal. Their entire defense was overhauled. Keon Coleman was their best offensive playmaker this year. It mattered in FSU's case. Mattered in Duke's case early on in the year.
Its going to be a big story going forward. SCAR doesn't beat us the year prior without transfers. Which means we would be at 9 in a row without the getting those players. How great would it have been to have Keon Coleman at WR this season?
I just don't like that we're viewed as against it. Every article i read is Clemson is failing to adapt. Thats the national narrative on Clemson and thusly I don't think players even think about us as an option.
I don't mind being frugal with it and not taking a ton of transfers like FSU does but I don't like the narrative that we're against it. Somehow Dabo and Co. need to flip that reputation and get a real quality player in the portal at some point to squelch that nonsense.
A Keon Coleman type player doesn't fit the culture that Dabo has brought to Clemson. We not Me lol Go Tigers!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23418]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 19961
Joined: 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1802]
TigerPulse: 97%
30
|
Re: Had nothing at all to do with the portal or NIL
Jan 12, 2024, 11:14 AM
[ in reply to Had nothing at all to do with the portal or NIL ] |
|
apparently according the genius' here we should have procured a kicker in the portal, it's that easy, and it fixes everything...
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1911]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
Don't worship teams that are built by using the
3
Jan 12, 2024, 8:54 AM
[ in reply to We will have a great WR group and we are also at 86 scholarships ] |
|
portal, but those teams that use it as a complimentary tool are the teams doing it right. Every playoff team over the last two years had at least one starter from the portal. Don't build from it, but use it to fill holes.
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [27]
TigerPulse: 87%
2
|
Thats what I meant by mostly.***
1
1
Jan 12, 2024, 10:29 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8277]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: We will have a great WR group and we are also at 86 scholarships
2
Jan 12, 2024, 10:29 AM
[ in reply to We will have a great WR group and we are also at 86 scholarships ] |
|
This...it's so cringe seeing every other post say "why can't we be like so and so" . You know you can join their fanbase correct? There are no rules stating you can't
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3395]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
The coaching staff is interested, but are they really pushing hard, my bet is
3
Jan 12, 2024, 8:44 AM
|
|
probably not. They are pushing hard on high school recruits. Next is keeping current players.
Portal players are at most third. A portal player has to practically recruit himself.
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [27]
TigerPulse: 87%
2
|
We absolutely did push hard for portal OLs the last two years.
1
2
Jan 12, 2024, 10:17 AM
|
|
Austin wasn’t a great recruiter and Luke came in late this year, nonetheless we made a strong effort.
Yet again, the portal is not why we lost 4 games.
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [46496]
TigerPulse: 78%
57
Posts: 34625
Joined: 2003
|
The portal isn't the only reason we lost 4 games.
1
1
Jan 12, 2024, 10:36 AM
|
|
But you can't say that it wasn't part of the reason why.
You don't think a good offensive lineman or two, and a good receiver or two couldn't have helped us win at least another 1-2 games?
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1802]
TigerPulse: 97%
30
|
Re: The portal isn't the only reason we lost 4 games.
3
Jan 12, 2024, 11:21 AM
|
|
sure you can say it wasn't... here read this:
"It was not the problem"
see how easy that was...
You portal pumpers fail to take into account that not everyone wants to come play at Clemson, and Clemson does not want just anyone to come play here, we don't take one-and-done and we are not in the pay for play business...
And I am quite happy with the dynamic we have...
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [46496]
TigerPulse: 78%
57
Posts: 34625
Joined: 2003
|
We have some great recruiters on our staff, starting with Dabo.
3
1
Jan 12, 2024, 1:19 PM
|
|
I find it hard to believe that we regularly sign talented players from high school who fulfill our criteria, but we can't do the same with ANY players from the portal several years running now.
Bottom line, Dabo prefers not to use the portal, and his heart isn't in it. The results speak for themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [27]
TigerPulse: 87%
2
|
Youre wrong as usual.
1
1
Jan 12, 2024, 2:51 PM
|
|
The results have nothing to do with the portal.
Maybe you can try again with your vitriolic mountaineers handle? You’re a strange dude for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19090]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [27]
TigerPulse: 87%
2
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [46496]
TigerPulse: 78%
57
Posts: 34625
Joined: 2003
|
Whatever makes you feel better.***
1
Jan 12, 2024, 1:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [27]
TigerPulse: 87%
2
|
And, if you dont have a QB who sees guys open
1
1
Jan 12, 2024, 1:27 PM
[ in reply to The portal isn't the only reason we lost 4 games. ] |
|
then it doesn’t matter who you have for receivers.
It’s the most important position on the field. We will go as Cade goes. I’m confident Cade will grow.
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [46496]
TigerPulse: 78%
57
Posts: 34625
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11984]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 12246
Joined: 2001
|
Nobody, with the possible exceptions of Texas
2
Jan 12, 2024, 9:41 AM
|
|
and Texas A&M, have a higher team payroll than Oregon.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2231]
TigerPulse: 97%
31
|
Whose scholarship are you taking away?***
4
Jan 12, 2024, 9:54 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3980]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Because we're not throwing money at them like other schools
3
Jan 12, 2024, 10:27 AM
|
|
I think Dabo and co understand that it's not sustainable. I think in a year or two you'll see the portal starting to calm down because nobody is getting paid anymore. Boosters can't continue to dish out the kind of cash it takes to get superstars every year. A one or two time thing? Sure. But this definitely won't be a yearly thing in the future imo.
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1876]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
+1 ^^^he gets it!
1
Jan 12, 2024, 10:36 AM
|
|
My feeling too. This game is going to circle back to being more about recruiting and development, and having both the culture and NIL to maintain continuity. Big boosters are going to learn that spending insane money on buying players rarely wins them a championship. The wells won’t dry up but they will flow much less vigorously at some point. Sure teams will hit the jackpot in the portal like FL State did occasionally , but that won’t get them consistency. The successful teams will stick to recruiting and development, minimizing portal losses of top players and filling gaping holes only with the portal. I hope we can improve on that last part, and we’ll be fine.
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7428]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 16042
Joined: 2002
|
I really don't get it. Most people with the kind of money it takes to
Jan 12, 2024, 10:49 AM
[ in reply to Because we're not throwing money at them like other schools ] |
|
"participate" in this NIL nonsense just can't keep throwing money at it, it's unsustainable because there is effectively zero ROI. I agree that after a couple of years it will start drying up a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1148]
TigerPulse: 91%
25
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
1
Jan 12, 2024, 10:31 AM
|
|
If you happened to actually listen to Dabo, the person has to fit with every aspect of Clemson's program or they won't even talk to the kid.
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [46496]
TigerPulse: 78%
57
Posts: 34625
Joined: 2003
|
Like Mike Bellamy, Chad Kelly, etc.?***
2
Jan 12, 2024, 10:37 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2231]
TigerPulse: 97%
31
|
They stayed here 4 years? Really?***
Jan 12, 2024, 11:13 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [46496]
TigerPulse: 78%
57
Posts: 34625
Joined: 2003
|
Because all portal players have bad attitudes and are all about the money.
2
2
Jan 12, 2024, 10:34 AM
|
|
Going after portal players is unfair to our current players who have worked hard and are devoted to Clemson.
Plus, Clemson doesn't have any money. We don't have any donors with big pockets, nor do we have any ability to help players get big NIL deals.
In addition, Dabo runs a clean program and isn't willing to pay players since that's what it takes to get them.
Also, there is a huge conspiracy against Clemson to harm our program, because other programs are jealous of us and our success. These teams, media members, and other clandestine groups have joined together to take us down, even if it means poisoning the good Clemson name to recruits.
Did I forget anything?
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19090]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
Re: Because all portal players have bad attitudes and are all about the money.
Jan 12, 2024, 3:05 PM
|
|
You forgot the door!!!
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [96146]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 96460
Joined: 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1238]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
1
Jan 12, 2024, 10:40 AM
|
|
They got NIKE money and can now spend it at will without having to hide it
CU wearing Nike gear is financing their NIL
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [34306]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
1
Jan 12, 2024, 10:42 AM
|
|
Do not currently have the room unless Dabo steers some others to seek immediate playing time that Dabo currently does not see happening for said player at Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1455]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
1
Jan 12, 2024, 10:43 AM
|
|
Looks like we got some good WR recruits signed
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1802]
TigerPulse: 97%
30
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
Jan 12, 2024, 11:10 AM
|
|
because we don't play that game...
did you read the offer made in the FSU deal? $15K/month for an O-lineman... that is far more than most of the people in the stands are making...
Clemson spent $2.4 mil on NIL deals (all sports) last year...
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5846]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
Jan 12, 2024, 11:19 AM
|
|
Please go read the FSU penalty announcement from yesterday. Paying a player upfront with NIL money is illegal. Can you imagine the penalty if Dabo cheated and got caught?
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [57069]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 23489
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
Jan 12, 2024, 1:06 PM
|
|
Nike dollars
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1312]
TigerPulse: 90%
27
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
Jan 12, 2024, 1:07 PM
|
|
We don’t need receivers. Clemson 2024 receivers will be #### good.
We do need a few OL for depth and a couple DE for depth.
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2658]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
Jan 12, 2024, 1:31 PM
|
|
Lol that's what we were told last year...speed speed speed.... I hope you're right!
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2658]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
Jan 12, 2024, 1:28 PM
|
|
We react way to slow and lack the cash.
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [712]
TigerPulse: 98%
21
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
1
Jan 12, 2024, 1:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1404]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
2
Jan 12, 2024, 1:33 PM
|
|
Who do you want to kick off scholarship
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [690]
TigerPulse: 90%
20
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
Jan 14, 2024, 5:30 PM
|
|
Whoever isn’t good enough to beat out a transfer.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5669]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
Jan 12, 2024, 3:26 PM
|
|
Well, another way to look at it is........if you were a hot shot, highly rated WR, would you want to be developed by the same coaches who just recruited and developed Ngata, Beau Beau, Ladson, E.Williams, Ajou, etc. etc.
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [96146]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 96460
Joined: 2009
|
What part of 'WE DON'T BUY PLAYERS!' don't you get?
1
Jan 12, 2024, 3:58 PM
|
|
You're beating a dead horse. We don't buy players and we're not going to start just because a handful of loudmouthed trolls are lobbying for it on the internet.
The tail don't way the dog at Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [60585]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 47377
Joined: 2000
|
There are a shidton of great players that won't go to Clemson, but will
1
Jan 14, 2024, 2:50 PM
|
|
choose to play for other schools. It's always that way, and always will be. But guess what - Clemson gets great players that don't go to other schools as well. Every school can only take so many players. Don't know if you are aware, but Clemson signed two top five/ten WRs out of HS in the upcomimg class. That, combined with the fact that we have some really good ones returning, makes it obvious why we weren't looking for WRs in the portal. But, by all means have a hissy fit over it.
I'm not opposed to proper use of the portal, but I don't believe it's a substitute for high-level High School recruiting. It's to be used selectively on an as needed basis. This year Clemson did not need it for WRs. One of the results is that OR, and a lot of other schools, will get some of the good WRs that Clemson could not take. Supposedly we tried for a few OL in the portal, but came up short. I have a feeling that if OR could have recruited enough WRs out of HS, they wouldn't need to be hitting the portal.
Could Clemson benefit from using the portal? Probably, and at some point, they probably will. Is the fact that OR got a good WR from the portal some kind of proof that Clemson is getting "boat raced" by not using the portal more aggressively? Hayull no. Take a deep breath, and land your plane.
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1995]
TigerPulse: 95%
30
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
Jan 14, 2024, 2:52 PM
|
|
Teams that live by the Portal, will eventually die by the Portal. This $hit has to stop or College Football with follow NASCAR!
Jezz!!! They just signed a monster at the receiver in the portal. We are getting boat raced!
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [690]
TigerPulse: 90%
20
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
Jan 14, 2024, 5:27 PM
|
|
What SO many are missing is the impact of not using the portal in terms of our OPPONENTS getting strong. Clemson isn’t as talented on offense as of late, but the recruiting is there. But BECAUSE of the portal, teams like Duke, Miami and FSU have been able to CATCH UP to us. It’s like being on a treadmill and not moving. We’re not actively trying to take a step back, but we’re still moving backwards if not making an effort to advance. Those teams beat us with transfers at critical positions — they were far worse than us just a few years ago. Those players Clemson does not go after will go elsewhere, and we might end up facing. We would be improving ourselves AND holding back opponents if we used the portal
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1312]
TigerPulse: 90%
27
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
Jan 14, 2024, 5:32 PM
|
|
We don’t need receivers. We r gonna have very good receivers in 2024.
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1802]
TigerPulse: 97%
30
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
Jan 14, 2024, 10:17 PM
|
|
because; for the 10,000th time, we don't do pay to play...
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9221]
TigerPulse: 99%
43
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
1
Jan 15, 2024, 12:43 PM
|
|
We don't need a WR from the portal. We have several play makers that can create separation if Cade has time to throw the ball. What we need is an improved offensive line and I believe we will have that with Matt Luke at the helm.
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [488]
TigerPulse: 68%
17
|
Re: Why cant we pick up these receivers in the portal like OR?
Jan 15, 2024, 9:39 PM
|
|
If I am not mistaken Dabo said he just looks within his locker room for replacement players to fill positions. I guess with all the " gritty, grinders who are ballers " he always speaks of, he doesn't need to use the portal. It will be interesting to see how this formula works out in the upcoming seasons. As of this date, this concept hasn't produced much success the past 3 seasons in pursuit of the CFB playoffs.
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4813]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
How is that a mystery?
Jan 15, 2024, 9:51 PM
|
|
Nike (phill knight and sonny vaccaro) practically invented the NIL concept in the 80’s and have been lobbying for it ever since.
Who is going to beat an NIL deal with Phil Knight?
They bankrolled and recruited Ed O’Bannon in the cornerstone case against the NCAA (O’Bannon vs NCAA) that practically established the NIL as we know it.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 73
| visibility 4202
|
|
|
|