Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
The problem with this Revenue Sharing Cap of approx 20 million is that
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Replies: 8
| visibility 1056

The problem with this Revenue Sharing Cap of approx 20 million is that

1
May 24, 2024, 7:55 PM
Reply

Collectives will continue to buy players (NIL) outside of the "Cap" as they wish. So, in effect there is still no cap as far as Teams' Boosters with deep pockets outbidding other teams for players.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So, did an employer ever "buy" you?***


May 24, 2024, 7:57 PM
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

How could they do that if I would not be an Employee?***


May 24, 2024, 7:58 PM
Reply



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That's non responsive.


May 24, 2024, 9:20 PM
Reply

We're talking about the athletes getting paid by an employer - the schools.

NIL money doesn't come from the schools.

NIL collectives don't employ the athletes.
The athletes endorse goods and services fir Tre NIL collectives, but they are not employed by them. Ergo, they aren't "buying" the athlete.

As I've stated elsewhere in this, an analogy would be like claiming that State Farm employs Patrick Mahomes. They don't the Kansas City Chiefs employ him.

His State Farm endorsements give him income, but they don't buy him.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yes, I think that is basically a counter offer.


May 24, 2024, 8:17 PM [ in reply to So, did an employer ever "buy" you?*** ]
Reply

You interview for another position, you get the job with a income increase.

You give notice, current management asks you what they offered you, if you chose to tell them, they may counter offer.

This is basically buying you.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The problem with this Revenue Sharing Cap of approx 20 million is that

1
May 24, 2024, 8:48 PM
Reply

This has nothing to do with NIL. NIL is just in addition to this revenue sharing from the school now.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The problem with this Revenue Sharing Cap of approx 20 million is that

1
1
May 24, 2024, 9:06 PM
Reply

What you don't understand is NIL is available to all athletes not just football players. How the salary cap works out remains to be seen but what it should do is allow all athletes to receive some NIL employment and that is a good thing. Deals that are made through employers and collectives have nothing to do with the cap.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The problem with this Revenue Sharing Cap of approx 20 million is that


May 24, 2024, 9:27 PM
Reply

Actually, from the reports coming out, it appears schools will structure their own in house NIL collective to pay out revenue as NIL payments. This will postpone for awhile athletes becoming employees of the schools. They are also trying to find a way to get pay-for-play 3rd party NILs out of the sport (on that I think they will fail).

<###### async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8">

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The problem with this Revenue Sharing Cap of approx 20 million is that


May 24, 2024, 11:01 PM
Reply

Correct. The “Employee” issue has not been settled.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 8
| visibility 1056
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch...76 days!!!

by O.J.

Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic