|
Replies: 22
| visibility 55
|
All-TigerNet [10402]
TigerPulse: 95%
45
Posts: 17413
Joined: 2010
|
The Coots beat ECU and ECU hangs 70 on UNC
Sep 26, 2014, 1:59 PM
|
|
The Tigers have got to put a major beat down on the Holes.
|
|
|
|
 |
Letterman [260]
TigerPulse: 89%
14
|
Re: The Coots beat ECU and ECU hangs 70 on UNC
Sep 26, 2014, 2:03 PM
|
|
Yeah 80's to 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2227]
TigerPulse: 88%
32
|
Makes sense
Sep 26, 2014, 2:03 PM
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10402]
TigerPulse: 95%
45
Posts: 17413
Joined: 2010
|
Re: Makes sense
Sep 26, 2014, 2:07 PM
|
|
Well idk about you but I live in a Coot town and they are talking more junk than after beating us last season. If some how UNC makes this a game it will be a bad situation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [484]
TigerPulse: 72%
18
|
Re: Makes sense
Sep 26, 2014, 2:09 PM
|
|
As bad as almost losing to vandy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10402]
TigerPulse: 95%
45
Posts: 17413
Joined: 2010
|
Re: Makes sense
Sep 26, 2014, 2:11 PM
|
|
But Vandy is SEC team on the road lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [153]
TigerPulse: 34%
12
|
Re: Makes sense
Sep 26, 2014, 4:00 PM
[ in reply to Re: Makes sense ] |
|
You didn't watch the game if you think they almost lost to Vandy. They won by 21 practically causes last TD was late when it was over and after scoring 17 in a row to go up 17-14 there wasn't really a doubt who was gonna win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5249]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
And their starting QB went down***
Sep 26, 2014, 4:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1039]
TigerPulse: 36%
25
|
That's the problem...if we win, good, but if we dont win by
Sep 26, 2014, 2:04 PM
|
|
30, the coots are going to say Clemson's not as good as even ECU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [484]
TigerPulse: 72%
18
|
Re: That's the problem...if we win, good, but if we dont win by
Sep 26, 2014, 2:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [519]
TigerPulse: 86%
19
|
Re: That's the problem...if we win, good, but if we dont win by
Sep 26, 2014, 4:27 PM
[ in reply to That's the problem...if we win, good, but if we dont win by ] |
|
If a Coot tries to make that arguement, just counter them with this:
Temple beat Vandy 37-7. SC beat Vandy 48-34..I guess that means Temple is better than SC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: The Coots beat ECU and ECU hangs 70 on UNC
Sep 26, 2014, 2:05 PM
|
|
From what I've seen of ECU - they could spot us 14-21 points and probably still beat us. They make it look easy. We continue to struggle unless we're playing SCST. Ok - I'm exaggerating but the point is - ECU seems to be a very solid team on both sides of the ball. They can score, and score quickly. I don't see us beating UNC anywhere close to what they already did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [354]
TigerPulse: 95%
16
|
Re: The Coots beat ECU and ECU hangs 70 on UNC
Sep 26, 2014, 4:07 PM
|
|
ECU is genually good this year. They beat Vir Tech, should have beaten USCjr, and owned UNCheat. Just because they're good doesn't exclude us from doing the same thing to UNCheat.
Expect another tarhole beatdown Saturday!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [31]
TigerPulse: 24%
4
|
Re: The Coots beat ECU and ECU hangs 70 on UNC
Sep 26, 2014, 6:03 PM
|
|
> ECU is genually good this year. They beat Vir Tech,
> should have beaten USCjr, and owned UNCheat. Just
> because they're good doesn't exclude us from doing
> the same thing to UNCheat.
> Expect another tarhole beatdown Saturday!
ECU is a good team, it may be too early to draw the UCF parallel, but they look good so far.
I don't know what you saw in our game that makes you think they should've won though.
As for the Vandy game, as someone pointed out they scored a TD in garbage time to cut it the lead to 14. Not to mention 2 kick returns in the first half (hopefully an aberration) kept them in the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [706]
TigerPulse: 100%
22
|
Re: The Coots beat ECU and ECU hangs 70 on UNC
Sep 26, 2014, 5:41 PM
[ in reply to Re: The Coots beat ECU and ECU hangs 70 on UNC ] |
|
On both sides of the ball really? did you watch any of ECUs games? They are not any good on defense
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
54
Posts: 44815
Joined: 2010
|
The Transitive Property of Football***
Sep 26, 2014, 2:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6619]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
I was thinking the same thing
Sep 26, 2014, 3:19 PM
|
|
Too bad the constants do not stay, well constant.
It is the most ridiculous thing that fans talk about. I have seen NFL teams get blown out by a team, and then 3 weeks later beat the same team by double digits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [79496]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 20596
Joined: 2008
|
I might have been thinking the same thing...
Sep 26, 2014, 3:21 PM
|
|
if I knew what that means.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2929]
TigerPulse: 98%
33
|
Re: I was thinking the same thing
Sep 26, 2014, 3:22 PM
[ in reply to I was thinking the same thing ] |
|
Pretty sure that happened with the Broncos/Chiefs last year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18160]
TigerPulse: 94%
52
Posts: 28096
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10883]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 12942
Joined: 2012
|
Last year, we beat the dawgs, dawgs beat the coots, coots
Sep 26, 2014, 4:24 PM
|
|
beat us...
Look for the opposite this season...dawgs beat us, we beat the coots, coots beat the dawgs...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22065]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 17342
Joined: 1998
|
Win 1st - the Vegas line is a more realistic point spread
Sep 26, 2014, 5:40 PM
|
|
than any of the "who beat who by how much" comparisons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
coots only beat ECU because of the refs***
Sep 26, 2014, 5:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 22
| visibility 55
|
|
|
50
