|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1807
|
Dynasty Maker [3506]
TigerPulse: 90%
34
|
Starting 5 for next year?
Mar 21, 2025, 8:56 AM
|
|
as for now. Does anyone Portal out?
Hunter
Jones
Heidbreder
Wiggins
Reeves/Roberts
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [2037]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Sounds like Wiggins will transfer***
2
Mar 21, 2025, 9:07 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22009]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 17303
Joined: 1998
|
Thinking 3 to 4 Portal staters and a couple off the bench***
Mar 21, 2025, 9:09 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2378]
TigerPulse: 96%
32
|
Re: Starting 5 for next year?
2
Mar 21, 2025, 9:09 AM
|
|
What difference does it make as long as Brownell is still the coach?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [887]
TigerPulse: 71%
23
|
Re: Starting 5 for next year?
1
3
Mar 21, 2025, 9:12 AM
|
|
doesnt matter with this coaching staff. We got killed on the boards yesterday by a team with a serious height disadvantage against us. Wiggins plays like 6' guard so that would be like paying with 4 guards on the floor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [347]
TigerPulse: 67%
15
|
Re: Starting 5 for next year?
3
Mar 21, 2025, 9:38 AM
|
|
And thats the coaching staff's fault.
Some of you on here are so fng stupid its funny.
Rebounding is effort and positioning. You dont think they have been taught and drilled rebounding the whole year. Geez.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [887]
TigerPulse: 71%
23
|
Re: Starting 5 for next year?
1
Mar 21, 2025, 10:21 AM
|
|
apparently not, we got outrebounded all year so no doesnt look like they have been taught anything. Chase Hunter admitted they werent ready, and yes that blame goes to the man milking Clemson for millions of dollars per year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [347]
TigerPulse: 67%
15
|
Re: Starting 5 for next year?
Mar 21, 2025, 12:48 PM
|
|
You are an idiot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4830]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Starting 5 for next year?
Mar 21, 2025, 9:58 AM
[ in reply to Re: Starting 5 for next year? ] |
|
a 6' guard who is a turnover machine and can't reliably shoot.
He'll transfer somewhere else and turn into an all conference player and make the NBA....
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7583]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: Starting 5 for next year?
Mar 21, 2025, 10:22 AM
[ in reply to Re: Starting 5 for next year? ] |
|
Correct! I knew we were in trouble the last couple of games when I saw Wig back in the starting lineup. He did absolutely nothing in the ACC or NCAA tournament games in addition to being a liability on defense and rebounding. You cannot tell me that the "High Energy" Foster could not have done better. Lots better!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8512]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Starting 5 for next year?
1
Mar 21, 2025, 9:17 AM
|
|
That would not be good. Probably going to get maybe 3 from the portal, probably lose Wiggins (please, Lord) so maybe 4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [100885]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 26196
Joined: 2006
|
Totally guessing
3
Mar 21, 2025, 9:59 AM
|
|
Hunter
Transfer
Transfer
Transfer
Transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6429]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: Starting 5 for next year?
1
Mar 21, 2025, 10:00 AM
|
|
Whoever it is I hope they don’t have to play in a game that requires fight. Those are total surprises for brownell teams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24712]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 16652
Joined: 2024
|
Re: Starting 5 for next year?
Mar 21, 2025, 10:01 AM
|
|
No.
JZ may be back. Wiggins may be gone. We have good young talent with the RS and some true frosh. We have the portal as well. No telling what it will be like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4535]
TigerPulse: 70%
36
|
Re: Starting 5 for next year?
Mar 21, 2025, 10:08 AM
|
|
good luck
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Cub [12]
TigerPulse: 100%
2
|
Re: Starting 5 for next year?
2
Mar 21, 2025, 10:16 AM
|
|
Dillon Hunter and del Jones are promising. jz might return and and I'm sure we'll get some transfers. praying Wiggins transfers out because I can't stand watching him play. all in all depending on how we do in the portal it maybe wont't be as bad as we think. I want to say we also have 1-2 4 stars in the 2025-2026 class too
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1807
|
|
|
50
