Replies: 4
| visibility 1
|
Walk-On [113]
TigerPulse: 100%
11
|
Solution for ACC Scheduling
May 12, 2014, 11:00 PM
|
|
I think there is a pretty easy fix to the ACC’s scheduling dilemma. The ACC can’t go to 9 conference games because of out of conference rivalries with GT, FSU, Wake, and Clemson; as well as teams keeping FCS teams on their schedule that allows them to have extra home games for local businesses. One rotating game isn’t enough, and that has been the biggest complaint from fans that it is too long of a gap for their team to play all the teams from the other division. The solution is to drop cross division permanent rivals and go to playing all six teams in a schools division with rotating two teams from the other division. This would break up some long standing annual rivalries like Florida State-Miami, Clemson- Georgia Tech, UNC-NC State, and Pitt-Syracuse. The other ones, most fans would probably be OK sacrificing in order to play more teams from the other division more often. In order to keep the important rivalries we simply realign divisions while still discontinuing the cross division rivalry system.
This gives us Division 1) Louisville, Virginia, UNC, NC State, Virginia Tech, Duke, Wake Forest
and Division 2) Clemson, Florida State, Miami, Georgia Tech, Boston College, Syracuse, Pittsburg.
This keeps all of the important and traditional rivalries that would have otherwise been lost from discontinuing the cross division rivalry system. UNC, Duke, NC State and Wake forest get to play each other every year. VT and Virginia get to play each other every year. Clemson and FSU and FSU and Miami can play each other every year. Newer additions and former Big East teams BC, Syracuse and Pitt can all remain playing each other every year.
The only criticism I could foresee would be that fans and programs might not see this as the best split between divisions for the best possible championship game. But it does have VT, Louisville and UNC which all have the potential to be very good against Clemson and FSU (who are in the same division now anyway so this wouldn’t change) and Miami and Georgia Tech who have been in the race lately as well.
I think this is without a doubt the ACC’s best option. It lets every team play all other six teams in its division. It keeps the traditional division champion to play in the title game format. It keeps the games that fans really want to see reoccurring on an annual basis. (for us specifically Clemson vs FSU and GT) It keeps the ACC schedule at only 8 games (without the years a team plays ND) to allow for many teams to keep their out of conference ACC-SEC rivalry games. It also maintains the amount of FCS games that are always at home to keep a team having 7 home games for their program that is important to athletic departments, season ticket holders, and the local economies of the universities.
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20890]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 14661
Joined: 2009
|
Not bad. The ACCCG IMO gets far too much emphasis as it
May 12, 2014, 11:37 PM
|
|
is. All those regular season games matter far more. The league tinkered way too much with division alignment to try and manufacture one single game at season's end, with mostly disappointing results. This type of approach makes a lot more sense.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1797]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Solution for ACC Scheduling
May 13, 2014, 12:02 AM
|
|
I like this breakdown, but your Division 2 (historically at least) is a lot tougher than Division 1. Every team in Division 2 is in the top 50 in all-time winning percentage. Only one team from Division 1 (Virginia Tech) is in the top 50. It might even it out a little if Notre Dame was added to the other division and someone like Navy was added to our division. But then you would have to deal with the Notre Dame-Navy rivalry.
On a separate issue, I really hope we go after Navy if Notre Dame becomes a full-time member. They have a great tradition, and I can say from personal experience that a trip to Annapolis to play Navy is 100 times better than the trip down the road to play Maryland.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [207]
TigerPulse: 86%
13
|
Re: Solution for ACC Scheduling
May 13, 2014, 3:44 AM
|
|
Div. 2 is to top heavy. I suggest to substitute Miami for Wake. I've always like Wake Forest, and the way they run their program. To bad Coach Grobe is no longer there, but sure they be left in good hands.
|
|
|
|
 |
Trainer [38]
TigerPulse: 96%
4
|
Re: Solution for ACC Scheduling
May 13, 2014, 9:26 AM
|
|
Why don't we just get ND to fully commit then go into a tri-divisional setup? That is if the NCAA will let us tweak the conference championship regulations.
Div 1 FSU MIAMI LOUISVILLE DUKE UVA
Div 2 VT CLEM NCSU SU WF
Div 3 ND UNC BC GT PITT
In this set-up, you would play everyone in your division, 1 permanent cross divisional opponent from each of the other divisions and rotate between the other divisional opponents.
For example, Clemson would play VT, NCSU, SU, and WF within their division each year, FSU and GT would be the permanent cross divisional rivals each year, and then they would rotate between the other teams so that they would get to play each team at least once in a 4 year span. For the conference championship, the top two divisional champions would play.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 4
| visibility 1
|
|
|