|
Replies: 44
| visibility 857
|
Top TigerNet [32192]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
|
Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 1:53 AM
|
|
Why do you guys keep losing to us? Aren't you getting tired of it by now?
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [78457]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 44004
Joined: 2004
|
LOL. They gone. ***
Dec 29, 2019, 1:54 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [110]
TigerPulse: 68%
11
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 2:09 AM
|
|
Not really.. i would have rather you #### on us again like in 16.
You had 3 major reviews turn 17 points in your favor, won the turnover battle 2-0, and were still outgained by 100 yards..
Sorry but the better team did not win tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [588]
TigerPulse: 93%
20
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 2:11 AM
|
|
WWWAAAAAAAAAYYYYYY! ??
Just like your crybaby coach!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [588]
TigerPulse: 93%
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [110]
TigerPulse: 68%
11
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 2:15 AM
|
|
Interesting because mant of your own fans disagree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32759]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 19217
Joined: 2000
|
No we don’t
Dec 29, 2019, 2:32 AM
|
|
Every single won of us agree that the review got it right AND your a sore loser
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3803]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: No we don’t
Dec 29, 2019, 7:56 AM
|
|
Oh you know rules don’t apply too them. Lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1944]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 6:36 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
Yes, the better team did win. OSU got the Clemson offense’s D game and still couldn’t stop them when it mattered. The “calls” you & your head coach are referencing (which is just one call, the incomplete pass) was correct. Your O line & DB’s got away with holding all night & weren’t flagged. I guess you’re going to say the textbook targeting call & the roughing the punter call were incorrect? The PI call on Justin Ross was incorrect, too? Nah, the were obvious. You guys were fortunate to have been in the game, and OSU’s offense couldn’t even capitalize on the gassed Clemson defense on the last possession. Clemson should’ve broken 40 points on you, and that’s a fact. Enjoy your excuses though, we’re used to it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10856]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
you guys were better on OL and DL than us. I’ll give credit
Dec 29, 2019, 2:13 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
Where it’s due.
The game came down to QB play. Trevor clutched it. Fields had 2 picks. He should have thrown the ball where the WR was. He made the wrong read.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [64122]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 44105
Joined: 1998
|
Fields should have had 4-5 INTs
Dec 29, 2019, 8:10 AM
|
|
and at least one pick 6.
If you're gonna count "what-ifs", you need to count them all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [180]
TigerPulse: 98%
12
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 2:14 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
You forgot to mention the OSU O-line's holding every other play that was NEVER called. But that's ok, we'll see ya again next year probably.
ST
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [110]
TigerPulse: 68%
11
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 2:17 AM
|
|
Yours held all game as well. There was also a no call on the hands to the face your oline did to chase young on the targeting play. Gtfo if here with the holding. Holding is something you see based on your bias
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5249]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
So is targeting, apparently***
Dec 29, 2019, 2:18 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [970]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 3:06 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
So tell me this. Was the no "hands to the facemask" when Higgen's helmet was ripped off as he was pushed out of bounds? Really, I'd like an answer after you review the play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10738]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Guaranteed - you’ll never hear from O310-15 on this one ....
Dec 29, 2019, 3:12 AM
|
|
...ROCK ... lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3803]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [504]
TigerPulse: 95%
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1052]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 2:14 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
You were up by 16 and did not put us away. Never scored a touchdown from the red zone. But hey, whatever makes you and your team "feel" better .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [110]
TigerPulse: 68%
11
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 2:17 AM
|
|
Hard to put a team away when replay takes away 10 points and gives the other team 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22001]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 13952
Joined: 2005
|
Whiny little ##### just like your coach
Dec 29, 2019, 2:19 AM
|
|
hahahahahaha
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2850]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1052]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 16363
Joined: 1998
|
Harder still when you settle for FGs instead of TDS ...
Dec 29, 2019, 2:36 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
The game lasted 60 minutes.
Ohio State was not the better team because they had a chance to blow it open and failed.
Case closed.
Move on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [48079]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [48079]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 6:26 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
Part of being a good team is not making so many mistakes. You guys might be a better team overall? Who knows? But you weren't for that game. The better team for the night was Clemson.
Hard to put a team away when replay takes away 10 points and gives the other team 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2868]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 9:28 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
Which replay was wrong? I want to hear it.
The head of officials IMMEDIATELY said the so-called fumble wasn't a catch. It wasn't even close to meeting the definition of a catch. Still not sure where Herbie saw "3 or 4 steps" like he kept saying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22001]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 13952
Joined: 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2016]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 2:29 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
Keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better. We can play the what if game as well. We dropped two easy interceptions one of which would've been a pick 6, also missed a fg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4757]
TigerPulse: 82%
37
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 2:36 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
Really brother, your team played a great game. Don't screw it up by whining about circumstances. Be a man.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3824]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 3:51 AM
|
|
If your guy doesnt target or hit the punter with both feet off the ground then there is one reversed call that all of the officials in the both, broadcast said was proper you probably win the game, but...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [817]
TigerPulse: 58%
23
|
The personal foul rules are literally there
Dec 29, 2019, 3:57 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
to punish a dirty team. Targetting was blatant, roughing the kicker was blatant. If you cry over dirty plays like those, you deserve everything you get.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2367]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 7:21 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
I get tired of hearing about who gained more yards. It would have been completely different if we had not been stopped 4 times by reaching the goal line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3803]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 7:53 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
You’re a disgrace to the buckeye fan base. Most likely a fair weather fanboy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3803]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [78]
TigerPulse: 100%
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [78]
TigerPulse: 100%
8
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 8:14 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
Not really.. i would have rather you #### on us again like in 16.
You had 3 major reviews turn 17 points in your favor, won the turnover battle 2-0, and were still outgained by 100 yards..
Sorry but the better team did not win tonight.
You didn’t play clean enough to win the game- and last night was when it counted - blame the refs if you want, but you put the outcome in someone else’s hands by not taking care of business- 3 FGs and an interception in red zone instead of touchdowns- your team could have beaten us And the refs IF you had taken advantage of your opportunities (if “ifs” and buts were candy and nuts, we’d all have a merry Christmas. Sucks to be you
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18244]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 10860
Joined: 2016
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 8:49 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
Really OhioSt15? Your mighty Buckeyes lost against a team that had the worst 1st QTR of the season (really since 2017), couldn't score a TD in the redzone the first half and got outscored 29 - 7 from mid 2nd QTR on.
Your Bucknuts still managed to take the lead in the 4th QTR and couldn't keep it and then couldn't take it back. Take your towel and go help Day dry up his tears and maybe he'll do the same for you!
Don't whine about the calls take it like a man. Your team LOST.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7260]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13781
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 9:25 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
It was a great game and props to OSU. Much better than I realized. The better team wouldn't settle for fields goals 3/4 of their redzone trips or get up by 16 and lose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2965]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6863]
TigerPulse: 89%
41
Posts: 13685
Joined: 2008
|
And 130 yds by No. 2 were fluke run plays
Dec 29, 2019, 9:43 AM
[ in reply to Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers ] |
|
don't enter your thinking? And, the pick-6 by Clemson that shoulda been?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [718]
TigerPulse: 91%
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [98]
TigerPulse: 84%
10
|
Re: Serious question for OSU lurkers
Dec 29, 2019, 6:12 AM
|
|
The only thing that matters is the score at the end of the game! all the b!tching and crying won't help heal the wounds. It was a great game by two great teams. Both fans loved it throughout except one moves on to the natty. Experience of being there and never giving up. The Tigers never gave up and were not going to make excuses. They used all the fuel in their tanks tonight. Can't ask more from your team. Those young men on both sides played their hearts out and gave the fans something to be proud of. For those OSU fans be proud and ready next year. As for us we have one more battle in the trenches to fight before we can call it a year. The heart of the Tiger lives to fight one last fight.
Go Tigers!!!! Bring it home to little ol Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10758]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 14207
Joined: 2004
|
Well Tigers, we would be bitter too
Dec 29, 2019, 9:04 AM
|
|
If we grew up in an armpit like Ohio. Dang shame how many of them live among us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3926]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: Well Tigers, we would be bitter too
Dec 29, 2019, 9:38 AM
|
|
True, true. The land of white trash and big-legged women is an unforgiving place. Moving is what they do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 44
| visibility 857
|
|
|
50
