Replies: 17
| visibility 1101
|
Letterman [156]
TigerPulse: 97%
12
|
If we create an AI that convincingly mimics human consciousness...
Jun 16, 2025, 9:37 AM
|
|
at what point, if ever, should we consider it to have a "soul", or moral worth?
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [103180]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 99140
Joined: 2009
|
I'm thinking when it doesn't need chips and circuits to exist.
Jun 16, 2025, 11:42 AM
|
|
AI also needs to shed take on the body of man and dwell among us. Word for a living or starve, stress over trivial matters and struggle with its mortality.
I'm thinking it might be a while before I accept AI and human.
Now you might ask AI how long it takes for me or you to become a computer program which depend on chips and circuits to exist.
Imo, AI understand the Bible moreover than the average person who identifies as Christian. That impressed me.
|
|
|
|
 |
Letterman [156]
TigerPulse: 97%
12
|
Re: I'm thinking when it doesn't need chips and circuits to exist.
Jun 16, 2025, 11:53 AM
|
|
What if we replicated the brain on silicon instead of carbon like we have.
Does the substrate matter if they are fully sentient?
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [103180]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 99140
Joined: 2009
|
Define sentient.***
Jun 17, 2025, 1:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Letterman [156]
TigerPulse: 97%
12
|
Re: Define sentient.***
Jun 17, 2025, 3:47 PM
|
|
Has a subjective experience identical to ours
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [103180]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 99140
Joined: 2009
|
That's an example not a definition.***
Jun 18, 2025, 7:09 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Letterman [156]
TigerPulse: 97%
12
|
Re: That's an example not a definition.***
Jun 18, 2025, 7:27 AM
|
|
Ok bud.
Not playing silly word games with ya
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [103180]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 99140
Joined: 2009
|
I'm digging to find out why AI would need to mimic human to get a soul.
Jun 19, 2025, 10:12 AM
|
|
We speak of souls being lost. One tense is when a plane crashes and everyone dies. That indicate their physical bodies cease to live. Your OP has a question which demands only other questions.
The other definition is a man's spirit within. Are you asking when will, or should we declare that AI has a spirit within or a physical body. I led you to that question and you simply lack comprehension.
My next question is, can you have one without the other? That will lead to us wondering whether or not a soul without a body is eternal and what happens to that soul when the body dies.
You must understand what I believe and I must have a clear understanding of what you believe if we are really going to communicate, a foundation must be laid. Right now we're speaking in different languages if we don't share our definition.
|
|
|
|
 |
Letterman [156]
TigerPulse: 97%
12
|
Re: I'm digging to find out why AI would need to mimic human to get a soul.
Jun 19, 2025, 3:12 PM
|
|
"soul" was in quotes, I don't believe in a literal soul.
> My next question is, can you have one without the other? That will lead to us wondering whether or not a soul without a body is eternal and what happens to that soul when the body dies.
Yes, of course, that's the position we are in now. I don't see anything special about carbon that makes it the only possible substrate consciousness could exist on.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [103180]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 99140
Joined: 2009
|
See, understanding and communicating isn't that hard if you define a few terms.
Jun 20, 2025, 9:00 AM
|
|
You want to know what I think and I want to have a simple, if possible, frame of reference for us to talk.
I too believe that a soul doesn't need a human body to exist. Our bodies, I believe, are vehicles in which we are transported about until we die. In the past, ~1960ish, we had this term 'free spirit.' It was used to describe someone who freely did anything the body demanded, a slave if you will to the human flesh.
Being a free spirit was exactly opposite of what you and I are discussing. It was then and remains so today. 'A woman trapped in a man's body,' or a man trapped in a woman's body,' we all heard those declarations. I submit that we are all trapped in a body and serve it thinking it's our entire existence. I have no intent in getting into the politics or right vs wrong of those declarations.
So what happens to our existence if the body dies? What do you believe?
|
|
|
|
 |
Letterman [156]
TigerPulse: 97%
12
|
Re: See, understanding and communicating isn't that hard if you define a few terms.
Jun 20, 2025, 12:36 PM
|
|
Considering that I had already provided a definition and no, "I too believe that a soul doesn't need a human body to exist." is not something we both believe, I'm not sure how that cleared it up for you.
But to answer your question anyway: "So what happens to our existence if the body dies? What do you believe?"
I think we ARE our bodies. Our existence will be in the same state it was before we were born. Have you ever been under general anesthesia? I think it will be "like" that. I put like it in quotes because, of course, it's not "like" anything. It's the absence of experience.
This is quickly devolving into something that is not my original question, though.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [103180]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 99140
Joined: 2009
|
Re: See, understanding and communicating isn't that hard if you define a few terms.
Jun 21, 2025, 8:13 AM
|
|
You used the term 'human like.' Knowing how you define that is paramount in understanding what you're asking.
Imo, AI may mimic 'human like,' consciousness, it may someday fool most people but it will never have any type of real consciousness. If you're talking about robots mimicking human, Data on 2 Gen, then no. Man can no more create a conscious being than he can life itself.
Relax, we procreate, that's gonna have to satisfy us.
|
|
|
|
 |
Letterman [156]
TigerPulse: 97%
12
|
Re: See, understanding and communicating isn't that hard if you define a few terms.
Jun 21, 2025, 10:02 AM
|
|
That’s a pretty big claim considering we past the turing test already without much fanfare.
I don’t think we are close to creating consciousness but I don’t see any physical law prohibiting us from achieving it.
Do you have an actual reason it can’t happen or do you just not like it?
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [103180]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 99140
Joined: 2009
|
Re: See, understanding and communicating isn't that hard if you define a few terms.
Jun 23, 2025, 9:33 AM
|
|
With your belief that the human soul/spirit lived previously to physical existence and remains alive afterword, I'm surprised you don't agree with me.
|
|
|
|
 |
Letterman [156]
TigerPulse: 97%
12
|
Re: See, understanding and communicating isn't that hard if you define a few terms.
Jun 23, 2025, 5:08 PM
|
|
I don't believe in a soul/spirit, so I can see why you'd be confused.
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [43202]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43602
Joined: 1998
|
Hal, open the pod bay door***
Jun 19, 2025, 3:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [5605]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
A: When you turn it off and it loses 21 grams in weight.***
Jun 23, 2025, 5:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Letterman [156]
TigerPulse: 97%
12
|
Leaving aside the pseudoscience, why would an immaterial thing have
Jun 23, 2025, 5:27 PM
|
|
weight in the first place?
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 1101
|
|
|