|
Replies: 26
| visibility 3110
|
Paw Warrior [5045]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
SC has lost 12 in a row. How the heck did we lose to them?
2
Feb 15, 2025, 11:08 PM
|
|
It will end up being a quad 3 or 4 loss.
Ahhhhhhh
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8927]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 11811
Joined: 2011
|
Re: SC has lost 12 in a row. How the heck did we lose to them?
2
Feb 15, 2025, 11:11 PM
|
|
Very early in the season.
Vival game.
But yep, it was an awful loss. Wish we could scratch it from our resume. Maybe every team should be able to scratch one early season loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8782]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Thats just basketball, it happens
1
4
Feb 15, 2025, 11:14 PM
|
|
You must not watch much basketball
😉
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20831]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
It's super hard to win on the road...
2
Feb 15, 2025, 11:20 PM
|
|
...and blah blah bleck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5045]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Thats just basketball, it happens
2
Feb 16, 2025, 12:16 AM
[ in reply to Thats just basketball, it happens ] |
|
You must not understand what losing 12 games in a row looks like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8782]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Thats just basketball, it happens
4
Feb 16, 2025, 12:21 AM
|
|
You must not understand what sarcasm looks like. I even used a winky face face for you.
Those are the excuses used when trying to justify why we lost to teams like USuC and GT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [8074]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2902]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2902]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: SC has lost 12 in a row. How the heck did we lose to them?
1
1
Feb 15, 2025, 11:17 PM
|
|
Yeah, it sucked, might cost us the NCAA’s. Bummer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8191]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 16062
Joined: 2001
|
Its a quad 2 loss and that wont change. Their schedule has
3
Feb 15, 2025, 11:18 PM
|
|
Been brutal and they have taken multiple top 5-10 teams to the wire - they are a snake bit team. We lost because Lakhin was in major foul trouble and fouled out - same story as some of our other losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5045]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Its a quad 2 loss and that wont change. Their schedule has
1
Feb 16, 2025, 12:19 AM
|
|
Genuine question. After losing 12 in a row, why will the sc loss stay a quad 2 loss? What makes them good enough to stay quad 2 with so many losses?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8191]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 16062
Joined: 2001
|
Their NET is 92. That is the lowest in the league
1
Feb 16, 2025, 11:29 AM
|
|
so basically they can’t really drop much. Q2 away games are anyone ranked 76-135 so they are upper Q2. In fact, if they win a hand full of games down the stretch they may end ups Q1 loss which is rankings 1-75 away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3679]
TigerPulse: 85%
35
|
Re: SC has lost 12 in a row. How the heck did we lose to them?
1
Feb 16, 2025, 12:19 AM
|
|
COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE???
I wonder what their record would be in the SEC if Stute didnt get hurt? He went 5-7 from 3 against us.
They lost by 4 to #19ole miss
They lost by 4 to #8 texas a&m
They lost by 5 to #22 miss st
They lost by 1 to #3 florida
They post by 3 to #1 auburn.
Im sure they would have a few more ranked wins if they had a random player go off from 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8782]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Does that make their record almost 5-7?***
3
Feb 16, 2025, 12:25 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [76361]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 43685
Joined: 2004
|
the SEC gets "quality losses" in football, basketball, and baseball.
2
Feb 16, 2025, 1:01 AM
|
|
It just means more. Every SEC team would be undefeated in any other conference. FACT!
Duke is so lucky they didn't have to play the chickens. Coots obviously would have just smacked them around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2902]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: the SEC gets "quality losses" in football, basketball, and baseball.
1
Feb 16, 2025, 1:17 AM
|
|
Auburn
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3679]
TigerPulse: 85%
35
|
Re: Does that make their record almost 5-7?***
3
2
Feb 16, 2025, 6:59 AM
[ in reply to Does that make their record almost 5-7?*** ] |
|
No, it means there is some additional context, and people that think its shoild be near impossible to lose to them are stupid. Sad that you are an app guy. You obv arent too bright. Didnt go to many classes at raley hall, huh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8782]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Nope, spent most of my time across the street in Walker
2
Feb 16, 2025, 7:11 AM
|
|
Thanks for the insult though.
I feel a lot better about our loss to the coots knowing they lost some close games to some ranked teams. Hopefully people will understand that when they put the asterisk next to their record
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3679]
TigerPulse: 85%
35
|
Re: Nope, spent most of my time across the street in Walker
1
Feb 16, 2025, 7:31 AM
|
|
Nice, I had a few friends at Walker. Have you been to Boone lately? A lot has changed!
All I'm saying is that the Coots are capable of playing with some really good teams. To act like there should be no way for them to beat us, is not fair or accurate.
2 things can be true at once.
The loss sucked and it was a bad loss.
USC has had some injuries and they have a top 20 pick in the NBA draft. One of their injuries dropped 19 points on us. They played well and we didn't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8782]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Im only about 45min away so we do get back there a few times a year
1
Feb 16, 2025, 7:57 AM
|
|
It’s changed a lot since my time up there but that’s also been 20yrs now.
I don’t expect us to be perfect and realize that upsets happen. I think there is a difference between an upset and a bad loss where you just crap the bed. The GT game falls in that category.
The coot game may not have been that 2 months ago but the more games they lose, the worse it looks for us. I don’t think many on here would chalk it up to just having a bad game, or being off, if we lost to them now.
That’s why I’m expecting a strong finish. The ACC is not that good and we close out with the bottom of the barrel. If we can do that it will start to change a lot of minds on here. Any loss to those teams will just reinforce the idea that we can’t turn the corner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1425]
TigerPulse: 99%
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17178]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 17016
Joined: 2004
|
Re: SC has lost 12 in a row. How the heck did we lose to them?
3
Feb 16, 2025, 5:38 AM
|
|
They had 3 guys with 4 fouls early in the/nd half and we did not go after them on offense to make them foul out. And they did go after chef to make hone foul out
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12432]
TigerPulse: 98%
47
Posts: 12635
Joined: 2003
|
Re: SC has lost 12 in a row. How the heck did we lose to them?
1
2
Feb 16, 2025, 6:39 AM
|
|
It seems weird this one obscure game gets brought up almost every week and asks the same question. The same answer is given but they have so little basketball knowledge the answer is never understood. It’s almost like there is so little for the LF to criticize lately they need to go all the way back to November to find unhappiness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3834]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: SC has lost 12 in a row. How the heck did we lose to them?
1
Feb 16, 2025, 8:07 AM
|
|
We traditionally play sloppy right after exams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4817]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: SC has lost 12 in a row. How the heck did we lose to them?
1
Feb 16, 2025, 8:12 AM
|
|
They had their best shooting night of the season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Immortal [171984]
TigerPulse: 100%
69
Posts: 29064
Joined: 2012
|
It was just their night.***
Feb 16, 2025, 8:54 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [29776]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 34770
Joined: 2009
|
They have lost a bunch of close games to good teams
1
Feb 16, 2025, 10:31 AM
|
|
Against us, they hadn’t had the snake-bitten feeling yet and had confidence they could pull out a clase game. Now I bet it feels like whatever they do they can’t win a close game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 26
| visibility 3110
|
|
|
50
