Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Republican hypocrisy out and about again
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 25
| visibility 1,476

Republican hypocrisy out and about again


Mar 19, 2021, 10:18 AM

Transgenders: SCIENCE SAYS THERE'S 2 BIOLOGICAL SEXES! YOU HAVE TO FOLLOW THE SCIENCE!

Climate Change: WE CAN'T TRUST THESE SCIENTIST! I DON'T CARE WHAT THE DATA SAYS, THERE'S NO CLIMATE CHANGE!

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I like your funny words magic man


Where is Bengaline when you need him


Mar 19, 2021, 10:27 AM

my lord you are stupid. This is concerning given your profession.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Where is Bengaline when you need him


Mar 19, 2021, 11:36 AM

There’s a high school somewhere with another Jerry Sandusky running around.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson doesn't care about basketball....as evidenced by Brown-L getting 14 years.


And these are the intellectual elite.***


Mar 19, 2021, 11:38 AM [ in reply to Where is Bengaline when you need him ]



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Climate Change is a religion


Mar 19, 2021, 10:38 AM

No rational scientist would study cow farts.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Republican hypocrisy out and about again


Mar 19, 2021, 10:43 AM

Denying that it is happening is a bizarre take, and definitely not the most tactful. It's just not possible to pretend that CO2 in ice cores and innumerable other recordable observations aren't real.

A far more insightful and wiser approach would be saying "ok... but does it matter, and what can we do about it?" Because in reality, there ain't jack crap we can do to change the climate or prevent it from fluctuating. It's the Earth for crying out loud.

It's just so on-brand for the modern republican party to choose the most anti-intellectual arguments for every position though.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Republican hypocrisy out and about again


Mar 19, 2021, 11:00 AM

Democrats hypocrisy out and about again

Transgenders: WE CAN'T TRUST THESE SCIENTIST! I DON'T CARE WHAT THE DATA SAYS, THERE'S 76 BIOLOGICAL SEXES.

Climate Change: SCIENCE SAYS THERE'S CLIMATE CHANGE! YOU HAVE TO FOLLOW THE SCIENCE!

This in a nutshell is why as a country we are screw.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Republican hypocrisy out and about again


Mar 19, 2021, 11:02 AM

I’d love to see this gender “data” you speak of

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Republican hypocrisy out and about again


Mar 19, 2021, 11:12 AM

My point is both sides are hypocrites.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Republican hypocrisy out and about again


Jan 26, 2020, 6:21 PM

That is true, but I don’t think comparing gender identity and climate science is really all that fair of a criticism.

There’s no scientific consensus about what exactly gender is or how gender identity is formed, and I doubt there ever will be as it’s a complicated question involving the whole nature vs nurture debate.

However, there is scientific consensus in regards to climate change, at least that human activity is contributing to increases in carbon dioxide and other greenhouses gases in the atmosphere.

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

no actually biology is well understood***


Mar 19, 2021, 1:21 PM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Any self-respecting biologist could tell you that there is


Mar 19, 2021, 1:40 PM

A difference between biological sex and gender. I understand that it can be a confusing topic when first encountered so I will do my best to explain here.

Sex is assigned at birth, refers to one’s biological status as either male or female, and is associated primarily with physical attributes such as chromosomes, hormone prevalence, and external and internal anatomy.

Gender refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviors, activities, and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for boys and men or girls and women. These influence the ways that people act, interact, and feel about themselves.

For example, while aspects of biological sex are similar across different cultures, aspects of gender may differ.

As such, there is no single explanation for why some people are transgender. Many experts believe that biological factors such as genetic influences and prenatal hormone levels, early experiences, and experiences later in adolescence or adulthood may all contribute to the development of transgender identities.

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Any self-respecting biologist could tell you that there is


Mar 19, 2021, 1:45 PM

And it doesn't even matter how you define sex, it's complicated. You want your definition to be chromosomes? There are XXY and single X. You want your definition to be sex organs? There are people with both, there are xx individuals with ovaries, there are xy individuals with gonads. Want to use brain chemistry? That #### is all over the place, lots of people who fall outside normal ranges.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Any self-respecting biologist could tell you that there is


Mar 22, 2021, 9:53 AM [ in reply to Any self-respecting biologist could tell you that there is ]

I posed this question before.

If socially constructed roles, behaviors, and activities, are factors in determining how one views their gender, would they also determine how one views their "actual" age? If a person is 40 but feels in their heart and lives as though they are 66 and 10 months, (retirement age for full social security) would you recognize their rights to the entitlement? If not, please explain why gender identity differs from age-identity.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Any self-respecting biologist could tell you that there is


Mar 22, 2021, 11:46 AM

What it comes down to is the definitions of these characteristics. Categories such as age or weight are able to be empirically defined (most of us can count, I hope), while characteristics such as gender identity are not able to be empirically defined because, well, you can’t attach a number to how male or female or neither male or female you are. Gender is subjective not objective.

So no, I wouldn’t support someone collecting retirement benefits at 40 because they identify as a 66 year old.


This isn’t a good argument about the invalidity of trans identities.

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The science is pretty clear


Mar 19, 2021, 11:45 AM [ in reply to Re: Republican hypocrisy out and about again ]

on sex: it's really complicated.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Republican hypocrisy out and about again


Mar 19, 2021, 11:11 AM

Say FB, where's your hero Algore been lately? Seems like he's got some 'splaining to do since exactly NONE of his predictions ever came true.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Republican hypocrisy out and about again


Mar 19, 2021, 11:23 AM

No. Hypocrisy is when people cry about climate change but keep living their lives exactly the same. What are you doing to combat climate change? You had offspring, that is the absolutely worse thing you can do for the environment. Stop ruining my planet.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Republican hypocrisy out and about again


Mar 19, 2021, 11:34 AM

True about the offspring. Overpopulation is the biggest problem this planet is facing.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Republican hypocrisy out and about again


Mar 19, 2021, 11:34 AM

There is no republican hypocrisy
- Nadler

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Anyone who thinks science says there are


Mar 19, 2021, 11:42 AM

two biological sexes must have been home schooled by idiots.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

so scientists are getting dumber


Mar 19, 2021, 1:15 PM

I think the left calls it “devolving”

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I think the science on both matters is much more


Mar 19, 2021, 1:02 PM

nuanced than presented here.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

who are you quoting?


Mar 19, 2021, 1:19 PM

My guess is that you are quoting your ignorant self.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


These kind of comparisons...


Mar 19, 2021, 1:20 PM

aren't your strongest skill

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Republican hypocrisy out and about again


Mar 22, 2021, 10:49 AM

You are really stupid. Haha

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 25
| visibility 1,476
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic