|
Replies: 25
| visibility 4235
|
Starter [395]
TigerPulse: 73%
16
|
Ray Ray's jersey number
Feb 5, 2015, 1:10 AM
|
|
I hope Ray Ray ditches that #34 because it's a hideous number for a WR. I doubt that I'm the only one that thought about this. Any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2253]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Ray Ray's jersey number
Feb 5, 2015, 1:16 AM
|
|
Actually, I think you may be the only one but you're surely right to have your opinion.
Message was edited by: tiger49®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [33]
TigerPulse: 53%
4
|
I agree...Jarrett only got #55 bc the Fridge
Feb 5, 2015, 1:50 AM
|
|
Was #55 and obviously Vic Beasley got #3 bc Adams and Daquan. I wish the official rules would just regulate a range of numbers for each position to identify players more gooder and better. I think OL should be forced to only wear #'s btwn like 50-79. Do you know how much more easiest it would be for the D if offensive backs like the QB were limited to #'s btwn 1-49...that way players lined up behind that yellow tv line like Sammy could be considered a back and take the snap at qb thus revolutionizing football offense. I callz it the single wing bc one side of offense looks like a bird w a hurtz wing
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2841]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: I agree...Jarrett only got #55 bc the Fridge
Feb 5, 2015, 2:50 AM
|
|
Man, I'm sorry, but your whole post is one giant struggle…
Your numbers are way off. Grady Jarrett wore number 50. William Perry wore number 66. Daquan Bowers wore number 93, not number 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18901]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 13655
Joined: 2003
|
this***
Feb 5, 2015, 10:03 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18874]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 11899
Joined: 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [33242]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 15111
Joined: 2011
|
Or David Lee something or Nother ....***
Feb 5, 2015, 10:07 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10900]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19353]
TigerPulse: 92%
52
Posts: 22266
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [311]
TigerPulse: 100%
15
|
Jersey numbers doesn't matter, number of touchdowns do.***
Feb 5, 2015, 4:35 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [395]
TigerPulse: 73%
16
|
Re: Jersey numbers doesn't matter, number of touchdowns do.***
Feb 5, 2015, 10:01 AM
|
|
Disagree...if you look good, you play good...swag....ask Deion Sanders??
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
Re: Jersey numbers doesn't matter, number of touchdowns do.***
Feb 5, 2015, 10:30 AM
|
|
So if he thinks 34 looks good shouldnt he keep it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [395]
TigerPulse: 73%
16
|
Re: Jersey numbers doesn't matter, number of touchdowns do.***
Jan 23, 2022, 11:05 AM
|
|
He wore number 34 as a RB in high school. Not as a receiver so it's different.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
Re: Jersey numbers doesn't matter, number of touchdowns do.***
Feb 5, 2015, 11:44 AM
|
|
still since its an eligible number and if he wants it why cant he have it? just because YOU dont like it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1035]
TigerPulse: 91%
25
|
I say it should be 11.
Feb 5, 2015, 10:39 AM
|
|
Also kind of matches his name. Haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
25
|
Michael Irving was #40. Must be meaning behind it. He would've had his pick of the litter of #'s
Feb 5, 2015, 10:48 AM
|
|
His senior yr of hs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [395]
TigerPulse: 73%
16
|
Re: Michael Irving was #40. Must be meaning behind it. He would've had his pick of the litter of #'s
Feb 5, 2015, 11:18 AM
|
|
Dude back in the day, people wore all kinda jersey numbers that didn't match their position. There's a hall of fame raider linemen that wore #00....plus, quarterbacks wore numbers in the 20's and we've seen the last of that from that fat one from Kentucky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
25
|
It's called style. Like Rodman wearing #'s 73 & 91***
Feb 5, 2015, 11:23 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
25
|
Clemson's cool in large part bc of their unique colors.. ala Oregon***
Feb 5, 2015, 11:24 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
25
|
A unique number may complete the circle for ray
Feb 5, 2015, 11:26 AM
|
|
Who knows?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [395]
TigerPulse: 73%
16
|
Re: A unique number may complete the circle for ray
Feb 5, 2015, 11:43 AM
|
|
The thing that gets me is that he wears that number because of Walter Payton and he's about to be a wr now. Wouldn't make sense. That's like a corner wearing #18 because of Peyton Manning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
Re: A unique number may complete the circle for ray
Feb 5, 2015, 11:46 AM
|
|
whats wrong with 18 at corner? whats wrong with a corner liking peyton manning? What if someone loves Vick and plays wide out is he supposed to not wear 7?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [395]
TigerPulse: 73%
16
|
Re: A unique number may complete the circle for ray
Feb 5, 2015, 11:54 AM
|
|
7 at receiver looks better than 34 at receiver
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
25
|
I think it's cool. Watch h.s./pee wee WRs start CHOOSING to be 34. That's how trends start.
Feb 5, 2015, 12:02 PM
[ in reply to Re: A unique number may complete the circle for ray ] |
|
SoMe CaTcH oN aNd SomE dOn't. (Just ask LBB)... BUT...
Name another WR you know who wears #34?
Exactly, I look at it as an opportunity to start a trend.
Feaster wears #28 when (as the best RB in the country) he could easily wear #1, 2, 3..... Whatever he wants on his own h.s. team. Think Spiller had anything to do with that?
Think Warrick Dunn had anything to do w Spiller wear in #28 when CHECK had his pick of the litter?
C'mon man.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5919]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
He's a Runningback/slot receiver
Feb 5, 2015, 1:24 PM
|
|
It's legal and just fine!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 25
| visibility 4235
|
|
|
50
