Re: Not a Political Discussion Just a Simple Poll

morbidtiger® · 2025-06-23T14:51:55.521Z

Just getting a check on what the TNET thinks in DT

Iran has been the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism. This support includes:
Providing arms, training, and financing to groups like Hezbollah, Hamas, and other militant groups in the Middle East, and that includes those responsible for the 9/11 attacks on the US. Using its Islamic Revolutionary Guard to provide support to terrorist organizations, provide cover for associated covert operations, and create instability in the region. Supporting militant groups in Iraq, Syria, Bahrain, the Palestinian Territories, and Yemen. Facilitating the movement of funds and fighters for terrorist groups through its territory. Being responsible for numerous deadly attacks, including those originating from Gaza and the West Bank.

No one hides uranium enrichment facilities that are solely used for civilian energy purposes deep inside a mountain. No one refuses to allow UN inspectors into uranium enrichment facilities that are solely used for civilian energy purposes. No one enriches uranium to 60% if the enriched uranium is being used solely for civilian energy purposes (for most nuclear power reactors, uranium only needs to be enriched to a concentration of 3% to 5%).

I think most will agree that a world where Iran does not have nuclear weapons capabilities is a much safer place.

N0VATiger®

National Champion [7140]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 1953

Joined: 2014

Jun 24, 2025, 8:55 AM [ in reply to Re: Not a Political Discussion Just a Simple Poll ]

Talk about dishonest and manipulative wording....

Tulsi was one official who said they werent, ONE. So why are you going on her statement as iron clad, never evolving statement of truth. Its because you are allowing your politicial ideation and hatred for "the other party" led you into an echo chamber

You need uranium enriched to about 3-5% for power plant use
You need uranium enriched to about 20% for medical/research use

They had hidden bunkers (why hidden if its above board) and enriched uranium to about 60% or 3x the non-military use. They have been trying for decades to obtain a nuclear weapon. Why do they need uranium enriched to 60% if not for a potential weapon. The ~60% comes from the IEAE

There are world leaders everywhere who acknowledge their mission to obtaining a nuclear weapon, and nearly all world leaders acknowledge Iran must never have one

UK, Germany & France joint statement:
“This is a serious development since the production of highly enriched uranium constitutes an important step in the production of a nuclear weapon,” calling Iran’s enrichment “provocative” with “no credible civilian need.”

French FM:
Urged a “substantial and durable rollback” of Iran’s nuclear programme to prevent it from gaining the capability to produce weapons‑grade fissile material.

According the IEAE (made up of reps from 30 countries) said "The IAEA warned that "no country has enriched to this level without eventually producing nuclear weapons", calling it a serious concern "

The IEAE cited that from Feb 2025 to March 2025 Iran had increased its enriched uranium by 50%, in one month. Iran had also removed surveillance cameras and slowed inspections, and curtailed access by the IEAE. This led to the IEAE no longer being able to continually monitor their program

So take all that, quotes from other world leaders, reports from an International body highlighting the dangerous situation, Iran hiding their program from view and as the cherry on top already having uranium enriched 3x the civilan level needed and you want to cite Tulsi Gabbard as the primary source. I think the person who is misleading is you misleading yourself.

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

Not a Political Discussion Just a Simple Poll