|
Replies: 12
| visibility 61
|
CU Guru [1692]
TigerPulse: 82%
31
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Tiger [33835]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2003
|
Let us discuss this logically my good fellow.
Jul 27, 2015, 2:13 PM
|
|
Is 4% body fat good?
Cause if it is, i'm a friken super hero. . I'm like 5 times that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [180]
TigerPulse: 100%
12
|
Re: Let us discuss this logically my good fellow.
Jul 27, 2015, 2:25 PM
|
|
If not mistaken u can only be 5% body fat without being unhealthy. Your body needs some amount of water in the muscles. Could be wrong just thought I read that years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [48079]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
Body far
Jul 27, 2015, 4:57 PM
|
|
The problem with body fat measurement is that the most common procedures used are at best only estimations. To get really accurate numbers you need to do X-Ray or bio electric procedures. Therefore when you're measuring low body fat percentages an error of 0.5-1% is quite common. Also at really low levels (around 3-5%) you have almost no sub cutaneous fat and the only fat left in the body is around the vital organs therefore measuring it becomes even harder.
A lot of actors have claimed to have gone as low as 3% during their shoots for various movies and 3% is considered to be the lowest your body can go to while still putting yourself in grave danger. The best of body builders will stay around the 3-4% mark only during competitions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [88864]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 48410
Joined: 2007
|
Oh come on, he's in the NFL, he's either getting a DEXA
Jul 27, 2015, 6:24 PM
|
|
or hydrostatic weighing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [39489]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 33570
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Oh come on, he's in the NFL, he's either getting a DEXA
Jul 27, 2015, 6:28 PM
|
|
Yeah ...Martavis gone get Dextrostatic !
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1725]
TigerPulse: 96%
31
|
No way
Jul 27, 2015, 2:24 PM
|
|
No way he is really 4%. That is even a stretch for the most accomplished body builders. Single digits is possible, but definitely not 4% though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [333]
TigerPulse: 90%
15
|
Re: No way
Jul 27, 2015, 2:54 PM
|
|
body fat percentages are rarely, if ever, to be believed. Gaining 20 lbs of muscle in an offseason without fat gain is just not going to happen. One requires a calorie surplus, while the other requires a calorie deficit.
Not to take away from Tay. He is an elite athlete and it appears he is putting in the work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9478]
TigerPulse: 81%
44
|
Re: No way
Jul 27, 2015, 4:00 PM
[ in reply to No way ] |
|
exactly
probably got that number using one of those hand-held electronic things, which aren't very accurate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [33290]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 15134
Joined: 2011
|
Maybe if he went to classes he could be more accurate ?***
Jul 27, 2015, 10:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6629]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Essential fat for men is 3%
Jul 27, 2015, 9:58 PM
[ in reply to No way ] |
|
So it is possible. I would still say he is 5-6% though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [284]
TigerPulse: 95%
14
|
Re: Essential fat for men is 3%
Jul 27, 2015, 10:14 PM
|
|
Actually it is possible much depends on genetics and training. I personally played college baseball with a teammate who registered 4% body fat and he was far from unhealthy. Although this is very rare! Go Tigers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1340]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: No way
Jul 27, 2015, 10:18 PM
[ in reply to No way ] |
|
Jerry Rice played around 4.5% body fat. Not certain about the exact number for Vic Beasley, but during his senior season I believe he was around 6-8%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 61
|
|
|
50
