Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Instead of prosecution - Biden DOJ rewarded Russia-hoaxer FBI criminals with $2M
General Boards - Politics
add New Topic
Replies: 33
| visibility 1315

Instead of prosecution - Biden DOJ rewarded Russia-hoaxer FBI criminals with $2M

2
1

Aug 3, 2025, 9:16 PM
Reply

Hidden by the Biden Handlers Administration’s DoJ (led by the pre-criminal-indictment pardoned Merrick Garland), the current DoJ has learned how the DoJ under Biden engineered the overall $2,000,000 settlement (with the DoJ being the defendant) to Russia Hoax principals Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.

After being outed by the Trump-45 DoJ as criminals who helped to engineer the Russia Hoax, by-then ex-FBI agents Strzok and Page (both of whom reported to [as-yet unindicted co-conspirator] former FBI Director James Comey), Strzok and Page sued the DoJ (by this time the DoJ was led by M.Garland) for slander & libel.

Seemingly inexplicably, the Merrick Garland DoJ de facto didn’t attempt to defend itself … purposely ignoring what, in hindsight, we know now what they knew then, I.e., that both Strzok and Page were known to have committed the crimes of which Trump-45 DoJ said they did. (I.e., Strzok & Page are now definitively known to played a central role in the broad Russia Hoax conspiracy.)

Turns out that M.Garland deputy Attorney General Brian Netter was the check-writer.

Not only did Strzok and Page get away with being co-conspirators in the Russia Hoax, but they were rewarded for lying because the Biden DoJ chose not to seriously challenge the perjury committed by Strzok and Page. Instead, the Biden / Garland DoJ rewarded the plaintiffs despite having prior knowledge of the plaintiffs’ guilt.

(*). I know that there are plenty of people out there who still believe that the choice between Trump vs Biden / Harris was equally bad.

Sorry. The level of highest level pervasive corruption and seditious conspiracy which was the Biden / Harris Handlers Administration made the ‘yes to Trump’ choice as being easily preferable. It is so bad that Biden / Harris’ handlers throw it in our faces that criminals against America’s system of government are handsomely rewarded, instead of being punished, for breaking the law.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/08/01/exclusive-doj-official-who-approved-2-million-payout-to-disgraced-russia-hoaxers-identified-as-left-wing-activist-brian-netter/

flag link
military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Even if any of this was true,

1

Aug 3, 2025, 9:35 PM
Reply

it still doesn't make anybody forget the almost set-in-stone fact that Donald Trump is a pedophile rapist. Unfortunately for you, this is likely entirely garbage, with the express intent of distracting people from the thing that scares Trump the most. But hey...Coke with real sugar and Washington being the Redskins again and whatnot.

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

RTD is working overtime tonight

1

Aug 3, 2025, 9:46 PM
Reply

to distract from Trump being a pedophile.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Even if any of this was true,

1
1

Aug 3, 2025, 9:54 PM [ in reply to Even if any of this was true, ]
Reply

^^^^^ this ^^^^^ is why regular Americans neither respect nor trust the Democrats.

There is no shame from the Democrats (and also not much shame from RINOs) when blatant government criminality takes place to reward their criminal colleagues who conspired against America’s system of government.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Alright, serious question:

1

Aug 3, 2025, 10:12 PM
Reply

is anybody going to be indicted for all this stuff that definitely happened? If so...when? It sure sounds like an open and shut case, a slam dunk, if you will. A Grenada.

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I guess this definitely happened cause, ummmmmm you said so?

1
1

Aug 4, 2025, 7:46 AM
Reply

Donald Trump is a pedophile rapist.

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

MAGA likes to forget that they control everything,


Aug 4, 2025, 7:50 AM [ in reply to Alright, serious question: ]
Reply

so they can’t blame the Democrats anymore. Trump’s DOJ is free to prosecute those involved.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You may want to wake up and notice...

1

Aug 4, 2025, 8:10 AM [ in reply to Re: Even if any of this was true, ]
Reply

All the former MAGAs who are turning on Trump now due to Epstein. His numbers are tanking. Those who still support him are basically saying, "I'm okay with pedophilia."

2025 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

I will rip you apart over time if that's what your looking for. - Carlsbad


Really takes guts to accuse the other side of having no shame


Aug 4, 2025, 10:04 AM
Reply

while in the midst of defending pedophilia.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Smelley, Garcia, and Beecher are going to lead you to 4-8." - york_tiger


Indictments imminent!


Aug 3, 2025, 9:45 PM
Reply

Speaking of which, when is Obama getting arrested?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Any day now.


Aug 3, 2025, 9:52 PM
Reply

TRUST THE PLAN, right, RTD?

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Any day now.

1
1

Aug 3, 2025, 9:55 PM
Reply

I don’t expect grand juries to be empaneled until late 2025 … at the earliest.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


And...when they're not...

2

Aug 3, 2025, 10:13 PM
Reply

will you acknowledge that you've been lied to? Or just kick the can down the road, and keep trusting the plan?

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Instead of prosecution - Biden DOJ rewarded Russia-hoaxer FBI criminals with $2M

1

Aug 3, 2025, 10:05 PM
Reply

RTD is bill jr

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

In other news the new Republican tax law has brought in $29 billion

3

Aug 4, 2025, 3:59 AM
Reply

Just last month. It has been paid by profit losses through the entire distribution system, and partially by the Americans who buy stuff.

Best part this new tax effects everyone. Especially those who are poorest, who buy the cheapest products, which are often imports.

So much winning.

But by all means Russia Biden Hillary laptop whatever....but not Epstein anymore.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

When folks say, "You'll regret that in the morning", I just sleep until noon, because I'm a problem solver.


Tariff revenue should be the sole source of Medicaid funding. Everyone wins.***

1

Aug 4, 2025, 8:05 AM
Reply



tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So if tariff revenue funds Medicare that's fine. But if tax dollars fund it,


Aug 4, 2025, 8:51 AM
Reply

that's not fine?

I just want to make sure I understand your position here.

You do realize a tariff is a tax right? It's just a tax placed upstream from the consumer, and is simply added to all the other taxes you pay buying a product.

You own a furniture company. You import mahogany wood from Brazil. That costs $1,000. With the tariff, you then have to pay $1500 for your mahogany wood. You then take that wood, cut it, and manufacture furniture. So you then pay employee taxes, corporate taxes, and then once someone buys it, they pay a sales tax. It's just one more tax in the process. But that wood, going from $1,000 to $1500, that cost is passed on from the importer to the furniture manufacturer, to the furniture store, to the consumer.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

When folks say, "You'll regret that in the morning", I just sleep until noon, because I'm a problem solver.


I said Medicaid. Medicaid "winners" pay zero income tax, this way they get to

1

Aug 4, 2025, 8:54 AM
Reply

pay something for their benefit, and maybe I could pay a little less.

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You're paying for it with every imported product you buy.***


Aug 4, 2025, 8:59 AM
Reply



2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

When folks say, "You'll regret that in the morning", I just sleep until noon, because I'm a problem solver.


I'm paying for it now with every dollar I earn.***

1

Aug 4, 2025, 9:02 AM
Reply



tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Ok, so you're still paying for it. And it's still a tax.


Aug 4, 2025, 9:08 AM
Reply

Spending dollars you earn.

What will ultimately happen, in my scenario, is people will stop buying mahogany as it will cost too much. And that will put the mahogany furniture manufacturer out of business, or they will have to scale down. He will lay off some (or all)his American employees, close his American mahogany furniture factory, and then his employees will go on MEDICAID, because they won't have an income.

Between Canada's wood tariffs, and Brazil's tariffs, it's going to be a bad 4 years for furniture. For buying it, or staying in business making it.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

When folks say, "You'll regret that in the morning", I just sleep until noon, because I'm a problem solver.


we should follow the dems and tax the greedy corporations instead

2

Aug 4, 2025, 8:54 AM [ in reply to In other news the new Republican tax law has brought in $29 billion ]
Reply

those tax dollars don't affect the cost of goods and only reduce corporate profits

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


That's a great idea. The libs of Tnet voted for that, but their hate of tariffs

2

Aug 4, 2025, 8:55 AM
Reply

always leaves me asking, "why?".

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Id wager that about 80% of people on TNet who are anti-tariff

2

Aug 4, 2025, 9:00 AM
Reply

are also for lower taxes for individuals and corporations. At least this one is.

You’re asking “why?” because you’re arguing with a position that nobody holds. You seem to be unable to reconcile the fact that there are conservatives who don’t appreciate populist, tax and spend, protectionist, anti-free trade economic policy, but that’s because the only principle or position you have is whatever Trump’s truth social tells you to believe in.

2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


No one that voted for a Dem stands for either of those and there are many here.***

1
1

Aug 4, 2025, 9:03 AM
Reply



tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: No one that voted for a Dem stands for either of those and there are many here.***

2

Aug 4, 2025, 9:12 AM
Reply

Bullsh!t.

Do you have ANYTHING AT ALL other than tiresome Whatabouts and strawman arguments?

Your two forms of response are basically: put words in somebody's mouth they didn't say, then knock down the bogus argument. And then WhaboutBidenObamaHillaryKamala?

"Yer honor, that guy over there killed way more people than I did...why you mad at ME?"

In any rational form of government, it'd take about six seconds for the people in the room actually interested in talking solutions to realize you were a major part of the problem...and kick you out. And I know I'm past the point of being tired of angry sociopaths with nothing to say messing up my world.

Any solution that does come up, you'll have no voice, and no role in creating. And you thoroughly earned it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


There are far, far fewer dem voters here than you want to believe***


Aug 4, 2025, 9:16 AM [ in reply to No one that voted for a Dem stands for either of those and there are many here.*** ]
Reply



2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: There are far, far fewer dem voters here than you want to believe***

1
1

Aug 4, 2025, 9:29 AM
Reply

Yes, despite Trump having the support of over 90% of Republicans this board is coincidentally full of the ten percent who dont like him. No Dems or trolls on this board. Sure Jan.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's no way I believe 90% of anyone supports Trump***

1

Aug 4, 2025, 9:32 AM
Reply



2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No, but 86% of Americans support a balanced budget.


Aug 4, 2025, 10:07 AM
Reply

Roughly the same support term limits in Congress.

Hummm..........

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

When folks say, "You'll regret that in the morning", I just sleep until noon, because I'm a problem solver.


Re: There are far, far fewer dem voters here than you want to believe***

1

Aug 4, 2025, 9:37 AM [ in reply to Re: There are far, far fewer dem voters here than you want to believe*** ]
Reply

Well, this board is full of upper middle class professional white males with college or higher education, not exactly Trump’s top demographic, is it that hard to believe?

Also, #### you and your mother for calling me a pedophile a couple weeks ago, if you want to be a man and apologize I’ll accept it and forgive it as heat-of-the-moment, but there are some things that are taking it way too far, and that’s one of them.

2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I'm registered as a republican.


Aug 4, 2025, 10:06 AM [ in reply to There are far, far fewer dem voters here than you want to believe*** ]
Reply

As far as I'm concerned, it doesn't matter what politics someone believes today. We have systemic problems that are not "fixable" by any political solution, or any party solution.

When your car has a problem, what political party will fix it? Do you take it to Nancy Pelosi or to Donald Trump, or Lindsey Graham, or AOC? NO...you take it to a freaking mechanic who doesn't give a rats ### about politics, and he replaces the belt that broke.

And as long as Americans look at our governemnt as they do, not as a machine, or as a system, but a collection of blowhard ideologues, the machine will stay broken down. The only possible solution is if SOMEONE, DGAF about their politics or ideology, SOMEONE looks under the hood and sees what's wrong.

You know why we are so politically divided? Because politicians want us divided. Why? Because as long as we are divided, and they blame the other party, NO ONE WILL EVER LOOK FOR, OBSERVE, and FIND THE CONSENSUS. Find the consensus, and you will see the problem. See the problem, and you just may find a solution, and that ticks off ALL the politicians, from both parties. A busted belt, a blown fuse, a bad fan motor, whatever. BUT NO POLITICIAN wants you looking under the hood. They want you angry at the other party and want you to blame them for your broke down car. But at the end of the day, neither party fixes it, and it will never BE FIXED if you never look under the hood.

There seems to be great consensus on reelecting our leaders in Congress. 98% of incumbents win reelection. THERE's some consensus. No one ever spends less. THERE's more consensus. NO ONE touches entitlements, there's consensus there. EVERYONE ever elected to Congress has increased their wealth and net worth, party notwithstanding. Consensus there. End of the day, it's the first course you take in political science that holds the obvious answer. HUMAN NATURE. Our nation and Constitution were designed SPECIFICALLY to mitigate, marginalize, and prevent human nature from ruining our nation. But, again, human nature dictates that any loophole or omission from the Constitution, will be taken advantage of by some opportunist(s). You can check and balance everything you can think of, you can think of everything, spend a year doing it. And there will ALWAYS be something missed, and that's why we have a multi-faceted process to amend the Constitution, because, human nature dictates that SOME weakness, some loophole, will be found in time, and exploited.

There are two things Americans broadly support, more than lower taxes even, or higher taxes, or abortion (either way), or DEI, or lack of support for DEI, there are issues where a higher percentage of Americans, from both parties, support TWO issues more than born-again Christians supported GWB, and nearly on par with the black vote for Obama. THAT LEVEL OF SUPPORT exists for things NO POLITICIAN TALKS ABOUT. Not even Donald Trump. He's simply an opportunist exploiting a failing nation. And shallow people know the answer. SPEND LESS. Sure, that's what they say because they know that's popular. But what happens? We spend more. ALWAYS. Why is that?

Nope, look for the common ground, find it, and the problem slaps you square in the face. And seeing the problem, the solution is also easy to see. Sadly, and I'm talking to my political party, I think many have resigned to the idea of burning the entire thing to the ground, as they don't understand the problem or the solution. This is where the vultures, the opportunists come into power.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

When folks say, "You'll regret that in the morning", I just sleep until noon, because I'm a problem solver.


Weird that Democrats only want to tax PROFIT of the company


Aug 4, 2025, 10:05 AM [ in reply to we should follow the dems and tax the greedy corporations instead ]
Reply

not every single thing the company does...

badge-donor-05yr.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Smelley, Garcia, and Beecher are going to lead you to 4-8." - york_tiger


Re: Instead of prosecution - Biden DOJ rewarded Russia-hoaxer FBI criminals with $2M


Aug 4, 2025, 10:46 AM
Reply

There was no hoax and the investigation was needed.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 33
| visibility 1315
General Boards - Politics
add New Topic