|
Replies: 11
| visibility 852
|
Campus Hero [13543]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 15777
Joined: 2014
|
Natty Bound????
2
Aug 31, 2025, 11:52 AM
|
|
Only, IMHO, if Clemson wins the next 11. Even then it will be very difficult as the Tigers head to the playoffs. Just not enough power in the trenches. Bot lines are overrated, as good teams push them around.
Also, our coaches don't seem to be very good at making adjustments. In the second half last year, Kirby Smart changed Georgia's offensive approach and Clemson never adjusted in kind. Same thing last night. LSU, instead of bombing away to their talented wide outs, dinked and dunked all night and Clemson never responded to it. It's as if the other team tries something different, Clemson acts surprised and almost doesn't know what to do. Coaching? Talent? Schemes? Probably a bit of all of these.
|
|
|
|
 |
Campus Hero [13543]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 15777
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Natty Bound????
Aug 31, 2025, 11:53 AM
|
|
Both lines...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Cub [-94]
TigerPulse: 33%
-1
|
Re: Natty Bound????
1
1
Aug 31, 2025, 11:54 AM
|
|
No. We are nowhere close to being a natty, let alone a playoff team
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2538]
TigerPulse: 85%
32
|
Re: Natty Bound????
Aug 31, 2025, 12:01 PM
|
|
Yawn
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13543]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 15777
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Natty Bound????
Aug 31, 2025, 4:52 PM
[ in reply to Re: Natty Bound???? ] |
|
This team lost last year's opener much worse and made the playoffs. Remember, the top 12 get in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4552]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Natty Bound????
Aug 31, 2025, 4:55 PM
|
|
We won the ACC. That looks unlikely this season.
Long way to go though
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1549]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
Re: Natty Bound????
1
Aug 31, 2025, 5:01 PM
|
|
We’re not close. Actually it’s getting a bit embarrassing to make the 12 only to flop on the national stage. Won’t be long before that dreaded ########## term starts to resurface. I realize how negative and pessimistic that sounds, but I’m afraid that’s where we are at.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1549]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
Re: Natty Bound????
1
Aug 31, 2025, 5:02 PM
|
|
lol even Clemson - ing is now banned
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1609]
TigerPulse: 84%
31
|
Re: Natty Bound????
Aug 31, 2025, 5:30 PM
|
|
I don't think anything makes you seem softer and makes the term Clemson ing more applicable than banning it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1734]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Natty Bound????
Aug 31, 2025, 5:03 PM
|
|
Offensive line needs to step up.. we rotated a lot of guys on dline and got some pressure, Niss was just getting it out fast
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1549]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
Re: Natty Bound????
1
Aug 31, 2025, 5:12 PM
|
|
Agree. And that’s what I don’t understand. Why can’t we fix the offensive line? Seems this has been an issue for at least 5 years. Imagine if Cade hadn’t had to run for his life all night and actually had time to read through all check downs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28419]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16782
Joined: 2018
|
Re: Natty Bound????
Aug 31, 2025, 5:29 PM
|
|
You could have saved a lot of time by just saying we aren’t natty bound…
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 11
| visibility 852
|
|
|
50
