Replies: 8
| visibility 5
|
Orange Blooded [3508]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Maybe next year we can have the Natty in Clemson and
Jan 14, 2020, 6:23 AM
|
|
allow our opponent to practice in a Greenville hotel ballroom.
Not an excuse....LSU was the better team last night.....BUT home field was huge for them.
|
|
|
 |
1st Rounder [632]
TigerPulse: 90%
21
|
Re: Maybe next year we can have the Natty in Clemson and
Jan 14, 2020, 6:26 AM
|
|
That site has been set for years for this game to be played in NOLA. Yes, an advantage for them, but each school got the same allotment of tickets. Let’s not worry where the game is played. We had our chances and lost
|
|
|
|
 |
All-American [554]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Re: Maybe next year we can have the Natty in Clemson and
Jan 14, 2020, 6:59 AM
|
|
Schools get the same allotment, but fans buy most of the tickets on the open market. LSU fans had the advantage of putting virtually all their funds toward tickets. Imagine if you didn't have to spend $1,000 just to get there?
TigerFanx2000 said it was not an excuse, and it wasn't. LSU played a near flawless game, and Clemson made a series of uncharacteristic mistakes. Too many to count.
|
|
|
|
 |
Walk-On [128]
TigerPulse: 12%
11
|
Re: Maybe next year we can have the Natty in Clemson and
Jan 14, 2020, 6:38 AM
|
|
Sounds like an excuse and not giving them due credit. Dabo also made the choice to practice in the ballroom. They were offered the Saints practice facility as well but they turned it down because it wasn't on "their schedule" (it wasn't on LSU's schedule either, they adapted). Seemed to be like Dabo wanted special treatment and decided to pitch a fit at the cost of his team when he didn't get it. LSU was the better team all around.
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7219]
TigerPulse: 70%
42
Posts: 20390
Joined: 2006
|
Re: Maybe next year we can have the Natty in Clemson and
Jan 14, 2020, 6:47 AM
|
|
Next year. You are already talking next year. Game 1 has yet to be played, and your talking Natty. How about talking about winning game # 1 because that is exactly the same boat we will be in next year.Like it or not, as good as we have been our conference pulls us down. We win, we are in, we lose, we snooze. This season was exactly that. Everybody we played wanted to be the team that beat Clemson and knock them out of the CFPs. Next year will be no different.
|
|
|
|
 |
Walk-On [128]
TigerPulse: 12%
11
|
Re: Maybe next year we can have the Natty in Clemson and
Jan 14, 2020, 7:18 AM
|
|
Playing garbage teams helped Clemson last year in the fact that we were more rested and less injured. It hurt us this year in the fact that we were under prepared and over confident.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6805]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Maybe next year we can have the Natty in Clemson and
Jan 14, 2020, 8:07 AM
|
|
We? Us? Ha!
|
|
|
|
 |
Walk-On [128]
TigerPulse: 12%
11
|
Re: Maybe next year we can have the Natty in Clemson and
Jan 14, 2020, 8:19 AM
|
|
I went to Clemson, graduated from Clemson, got my masters at Clemson. I'm not allowed to say "we" or "us"? Why? Because I don't fall in line with all the sore loser narratives? I'm sorry:
-Clemson is the best team in the world -LSU fans are the worst fans in the world -Bama fans are the worst fans in the world -UGA fans are the worst fans in the world -South Carolina fans are the worst fans in the world -Dabo is the best coach in the world -DW4 is the best quarterback in the NFL -DW4 should have won the Heisman, it's obvious there was a bias -All the refs are biased against Clemson whomever we play -We outcoached LSU, they only won because [insert random excuse here] -Clemson won the championship in 2019 because Bama are pieces of garbage and their players and fans are garbage.
There, blind allegiance, sore loser and sore winner. Am I allowed to say "we" and "us" now?
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6805]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Maybe next year we can have the Natty in Clemson and
Jan 16, 2020, 3:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 8
| visibility 5
|
|
|