|
Replies: 16
| visibility 2556
|
All-Pro [770]
TigerPulse: 100%
22
|
|
|
|
 |
Solid Orange [1320]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: Joe Lunardis Bracket
2
Mar 6, 2025, 1:01 PM
|
|
It’s fine. I still think we play our way into a 4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [3062]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: Joe Lunardis Bracket
2
Mar 6, 2025, 1:51 PM
|
|
We should be challenging for a 3 seed at the very least. A 4 seed should be a lock and be over Kentucky with our head to head win, not a 5 seed. Latardo is a joke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [822]
TigerPulse: 97%
23
|
Re: Joe Lunardis Bracket
1
Mar 6, 2025, 1:04 PM
|
|
Reminds me why I'm not a fan of lundardi
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [770]
TigerPulse: 100%
22
|
Re: Joe Lunardis Bracket
1
Mar 6, 2025, 1:32 PM
|
|
I thinks his brackets are terrible and extremely biased to historically great teams. If we were UNC and they had the same record and resume as us, they would be at least a 3 seed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [29777]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 34770
Joined: 2009
|
17-2 in ACC and 25-5 overall would be challenging for a #1 seed most years***
3
Mar 6, 2025, 1:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [11048]
TigerPulse: 73%
45
Posts: 10916
Joined: 2017
|
Re: Joe Lunardis Bracket
2
Mar 6, 2025, 1:33 PM
|
|
I think I didn’t waste time reading it because it’s not the bracket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [770]
TigerPulse: 100%
22
|
Re: Joe Lunardis Bracket
2
Mar 6, 2025, 1:50 PM
|
|
Good idea.
I think it’s ridiculous how ESPN keeps this man employed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7253]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13778
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Joe Lunardis Bracket
1
Mar 6, 2025, 3:33 PM
[ in reply to Re: Joe Lunardis Bracket ] |
|
Every post about a bracket u look at and comment on so stop saying u don't care.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [11048]
TigerPulse: 73%
45
Posts: 10916
Joined: 2017
|
No.
Mar 6, 2025, 4:13 PM
|
|
I read the TNet post. Not the bracket.
Is that too complicated for you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [703]
TigerPulse: 88%
22
|
Re: Joe Lunardis Bracket
1
Mar 6, 2025, 3:12 PM
|
|
We will most likely be a 5, possibly a 4, and a 3 if we win the acc tourney and the wins include Louisville AND Duke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19019]
TigerPulse: 95%
52
Posts: 17565
Joined: 2004
|
Re: Joe Lunardis Bracket
1
Mar 6, 2025, 3:29 PM
|
|
We will most likely be a 5, possibly a 4, and a 3 if we win the acc tourney and the wins include Louisville AND Duke.
Metrics point out that highest likely will be the top 4 seed. 3 is very unlikely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7253]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13778
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Joe Lunardis Bracket
1
Mar 6, 2025, 3:34 PM
|
|
If we win Saturday and then go win the acc tourney we will be a 3 seed for sure. Should be a 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19019]
TigerPulse: 95%
52
Posts: 17565
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7253]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13778
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Joe Lunardis Bracket
1
Mar 6, 2025, 3:36 PM
|
|
Besides Maryland there really isn't much difference. Guessing between 4 and 5 seed is like flipping a coin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4437]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Joe Lunardis Bracket
1
Mar 6, 2025, 4:13 PM
|
|
I sure hope he’s wrong. End of discussion. Go tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [70339]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 13046
Joined: 2019
|
Re: Joe Lunardis Bracket
Mar 6, 2025, 4:44 PM
|
|
Kentucky, Texas A&M should not be ahead of us. Probably more on that list as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 2556
|
|
|
50
