|
Texas, USC, Ohio State, and Nebraska cancel spring games. Probably some
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 2259
|
Orange Phenom [14574]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13542
Joined: 2001
|
Texas, USC, Ohio State, and Nebraska cancel spring games. Probably some
2
Feb 20, 2025, 4:28 PM
|
|
others, but those are big-name programs.
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Spirit [9114]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Texas, USC, Ohio State, and Nebraska cancel spring games. Probably some
1
Feb 20, 2025, 4:37 PM
|
|
Those programs may not have enough team culture to inspire loyalty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7725]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: Its A Move To Try To Protect Their Eggs And Assets ---
3
Feb 20, 2025, 4:44 PM
|
|
Theres poachers about
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [79487]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 20596
Joined: 2008
|
THIS^^^ probably a smart move since guys who don't
Feb 21, 2025, 8:10 AM
|
|
make it as starters might consider transfer to somewhere they are promised that. And with more money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1959]
TigerPulse: 81%
31
|
Welcome to President Musks America.
6
6
Feb 21, 2025, 7:39 AM
|
|
Nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2512]
TigerPulse: 98%
32
|
Re: Welcome to President Musks America.
2
Feb 21, 2025, 8:58 AM
|
|
Found the idiot. Wspanic ^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [392]
TigerPulse: 98%
16
|
Personally, I would not be opposed to
Feb 21, 2025, 8:06 AM
|
|
canceling our spring game. I typically go, but frankly don't get much out of it. Many of us left the game last year thinking Trent Pearman should get some run in the fall. Just went to show you that you can't believe much you see there. Yes you get to see some of the new guys, but is it worth the cost and risk of injury? Don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [15437]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 15922
Joined: 2010
|
Re: Personally, I would not be opposed to
Feb 21, 2025, 8:14 AM
|
|
It just means nothing IMO. Rather see a deep run in the CFP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3442]
TigerPulse: 71%
34
|
I have said for years
1
Feb 21, 2025, 9:13 AM
[ in reply to Personally, I would not be opposed to ] |
|
The only reason a spring game is scheduled is so people can practice their tailgating skills. I think it is a great idea to eliminate it. Definitely keep it off of TV. There are poachers out there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11332]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 12640
Joined: 1999
|
My kid's excitement over attending The Spring Game was always huge. But who
Feb 21, 2025, 8:52 AM
|
|
cares about the fans anyway, am I right?
Just another brick in the wall...
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3721]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
The Spring Game is very scripted. Last year's made Cade
Feb 21, 2025, 9:11 AM
|
|
look like he regressed. It sent fans into the off season with more doubts and questions than it was worth.
Should Cade have performed better? Probably. He definitely would have if he had all 1st teamers playing at the same time. The finger tip touch rule negates 90% of good runs.
As a fan, I would rather see the starters go out and perform as if they didn't miss a beat for a drive, then let everyone else play. They can be mixed back in for situations.
It doesn't mean much, but means a LOT if the starters look bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [324]
TigerPulse: 98%
15
|
Re: Texas, USC, Ohio State, and Nebraska cancel spring games. Probably some
Feb 21, 2025, 9:54 AM
|
|
I love the spring game. Look forward to it every year. You don’t want to hurt your good players so they play sparingly. It’s a chance for the youngsters to show what they’ve got. Schools don’t want to do that anymore because someone will want them and offer them to transfer. That’s the world we live in. Which sucks. Gotta hide your players.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [11077]
TigerPulse: 73%
45
Posts: 10954
Joined: 2017
|
Sad!!!***
Feb 21, 2025, 9:57 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 2259
|
|
|
|
50
