|
Replies: 13
| visibility 113
|
National Champion [7260]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13781
Joined: 2015
|
Is the goal to get the best teams in?
2
Mar 12, 2023, 3:50 PM
|
|
If so how can NC St be in over us? I really hope they ask that question on the show tonight if they do get in over us
|
|
|
|
 |
Head Coach [931]
TigerPulse: 43%
24
|
Re: Is the goal to get the best teams in?
1
Mar 12, 2023, 3:51 PM
|
|
when.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7260]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13781
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Is the goal to get the best teams in?
1
Mar 12, 2023, 3:55 PM
|
|
Not sure how they can justify it unless they say that they don't care if it's the best basketball teams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [78572]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 44012
Joined: 2004
|
Re: Is the goal to get the best teams in?
1
Mar 12, 2023, 3:58 PM
|
|
They can’t say that with all the AQs getting in. It’s a show. It’s entertainment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [78804]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 120312
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Is the goal to get the best teams in? NO the goal
1
Mar 12, 2023, 3:54 PM
|
|
is to give too much pay and exposure for number geek bracket bozos.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [30960]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 11269
Joined: 2013
|
Re: Is the goal to get the best teams in?
2
Mar 12, 2023, 3:57 PM
|
|
No. The goal is to get the best revenue making matchups in. No one wants to see a team that lost to Louisville play anybody in the tournament. Zero ratings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3159]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
I hope you are not serious…
Mar 12, 2023, 4:10 PM
|
|
Look at the actual resumes of the other bubble teams and let me know of that group who is bringing the ‘cash flow’…
I’m sure Utah State, Mississippi State, etc. and the 10th place Big Ten team or whatever are in high demand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24158]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13641
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Is the goal to get the best teams in?
1
Mar 12, 2023, 4:02 PM
|
|
NC State lost to #9 Kansas, #67 Pitt, #35 Miami, #60 Clemson, #46 North Carolina, #26 Virginia, #126 Syracuse, #60 Clemson, #16 Duke, #60 Clemson.
Clemson lost to #234 South Carolina, #39 Iowa, #267 Loyola Chicago, #90 Wake Forest, #168 Boston College, #35 Miami, #46 North Carolina, #315 Louisville, #26 Virginia, #26 Virginia.
So Clemson has 4 losses to teams that are ranked lower than the worst team that NC State lost to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3159]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Care to do the same with their wins? Or others?…
Mar 12, 2023, 4:11 PM
|
|
Would love to see it
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7260]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13781
Joined: 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [931]
TigerPulse: 43%
24
|
Re: Is the goal to get the best teams in?
Mar 12, 2023, 4:30 PM
|
|
Are South Carolina, Louis, LC and BC all better teams? They beat CU all FOUR times they played from December to Feb.
Those four teams lost a combined 90 games.
You lost to UNC head-to-head, so I guess the Tarheels should be ahead of Clemson, also.
Clemson's entire argument is beating a flawed NCST team 3 times, a undermanned, injured Duke team, and Pitt on the road.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7260]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13781
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Is the goal to get the best teams in?
Mar 12, 2023, 4:31 PM
|
|
You are comparing playing a team once to 3 times. That is not close to the same thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7260]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13781
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Is the goal to get the best teams in?
Mar 12, 2023, 4:32 PM
[ in reply to Re: Is the goal to get the best teams in? ] |
|
I'm okay with not being in. Just not okay with NC St getting in and us not. If we played them once then who knows but we beat them 4 times and 16 was as close as they could get. Pretty obvious who the better team is. Not sure u have much an arguement against that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20805]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 18733
Joined: 2012
|
It’s a best / deserving thing
Mar 12, 2023, 4:42 PM
|
|
Best you can figure in the eye test and head to head.
Deserving you can look at the Q1 wins and Q4 losses.
Conundrum with Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 13
| visibility 113
|
|
|
50
