|
Replies: 17
| visibility 2355
|
Game Changer [1810]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Indisputable word means nothing.
8
8
Sep 27, 2024, 11:35 PM
|
|
Time and again, refs use video replay to overturn plays that, per the rules, must have INDISPUTABLE video evidence to overturn.
They need to take that word out of the rulebook if they aren’t going to abide by it. Indisputable means anyone who looks at it will draw the same, OBVIOUS conclusion. That was NOT THE CASE!!! Not obvious whatsoever that that wasn’t a catch!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Offensive Star [-99]
TigerPulse: 44%
-1
|
Re: Indisputable word means nothing.
4
Sep 27, 2024, 11:37 PM
|
|
Relax dude. He never had control or possession of the ball. Not even for a second.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10867]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: Indisputable word means nothing.
4
Sep 27, 2024, 11:40 PM
|
|
But they called it a touchdown...there was not indisputable evidence in the replay to contradict that. Too much going on to tell
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [-99]
TigerPulse: 44%
-1
|
Re: Indisputable word means nothing.
2
3
Sep 27, 2024, 11:41 PM
|
|
The call on the field was wrong. That’s why they reversed it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10867]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: Indisputable word means nothing.
8
8
Sep 27, 2024, 11:38 PM
|
|
Refs using the word "indisputable" is as useless as a recruit using the word "committed"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [104998]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 99774
Joined: 2009
|
That is why...
Sep 28, 2024, 10:49 AM
|
|
You drop 50 on a team before the refs know what's going on.
Miami is not going to be s challenge for Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [36642]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 15260
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Indisputable word means nothing.
3
Sep 27, 2024, 11:39 PM
|
|
Reduce the review time to one minute. That would solve most of this subjectivity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1810]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Indisputable word means nothing.
2
Sep 27, 2024, 11:40 PM
|
|
Not a bad idea… if it’s not obvious that the call on the field was wrong after 60 seconds, keep the call the same
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [36642]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 15260
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Indisputable word means nothing.
1
Sep 27, 2024, 11:51 PM
|
|
yep, when they blow up the picture to show a blurry pixelated shot..... Not 'obvious' to overturn...play should stand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5227]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Amazing w/ all the advances in technology that we still get
1
Sep 28, 2024, 12:14 AM
|
|
Grainy, pixilated images when it comes to something of importance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12733]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
Re: Amazing w/ all the advances in technology that we still get
Sep 28, 2024, 1:26 PM
|
|
Hmmm? Aliens?? Chinese? Russians? ACC?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1384]
TigerPulse: 74%
28
|
Re: Indisputable word means nothing.
Sep 28, 2024, 12:41 PM
[ in reply to Re: Indisputable word means nothing. ] |
|
Also with Refs...no PI in the sec...clear head shot on Miss, not called or even suggested by announcers...SEC hangs!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31631]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 35757
Joined: 2009
|
I dont think it has ever meant anything really
1
Sep 28, 2024, 12:07 AM
|
|
I’ve seen many calls through the years reversed by dubious evidence at best
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5882]
TigerPulse: 47%
39
Posts: 18961
Joined: 2005
|
Re: I dont think it has ever meant anything really
Sep 28, 2024, 12:18 AM
|
|
Precisely. The goal should be to get the call right more so than just to follow a procedure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5882]
TigerPulse: 47%
39
Posts: 18961
Joined: 2005
|
Re: Indisputable word means nothing.
Sep 28, 2024, 12:17 AM
|
|
You can't require indisputable evidence when the on the field referees make such a terrible call live.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [647]
TigerPulse: 95%
21
|
Re: Indisputable word means nothing.
1
Sep 28, 2024, 7:52 AM
|
|
Agreed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2452]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Indisputable word means nothing.
Sep 28, 2024, 10:06 AM
|
|
I don't really mind the standard used to overturn a play that is generally used, but agree that standard is not indisputable. If they changed the verbiage to "highly likely", I wonder if the standard would change to require less evidence to overturn a play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3149]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Unfortunately what happens now
Sep 28, 2024, 11:22 AM
|
|
Is officials on the field make a lot of close calls in whichever way will allow video review to decide it. That’s exactly what happened last night. No way they could see to make a call of complete pass with so many hands on the ball and an out of bounds defender comes out with it. So they left it up the review. Indisputable shouldn’t even be in the verbiage now that they do this regularly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 2355
|
|
|
50
