Re: I do not like witch hunts . .

PetesPonies · 2021-03-09T04:47:06.539Z

and I believe that is exactly what has happened with Miles at Kansas. Not a Miles fan for any reason, but nothing but accusations, 8 years ago, at another school . . . ridiculous. The world . . is jacked up.

wueagle86®

Paw Master [17831]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 7820

Joined: 2006

Mar 9, 2021, 12:24 AM

I agree. A man’s reputation has been destroyed and his accuser’s are hero. Yet that person has not had his day in court to defend himself before a jury of his peers.

At least give Les Miles his day in court. If he’s guilty put him in prison, but try to remember we are innocent until proven guilty! That’s the Law! If a woman accuses a man of any kind of improper behavior he is presumed guilty. He has to spend thousands to prove his innocence. By then the media and many people have already destroyed that man’s character. You do not read about apologies by the accusers or from the media when an accused person is proven innocent. If the man is innocent it’s usually swept under the rug. Let’s also not forget men can be sexually harassed by women.

If men or women are proven guilty I will be the first one in line to give support. But I refuse to jump on the bandwagon and drag a person through the mud based on rumors or 8 to 10 year old accusations. Innocent until proven guilty! If these victims are so brave why did it take 8 to 10 years to come out.

If accusations were suppressed then those who protected the guilty should be brought down to. They should go to prison for a minimum of 5 to 7 years.

Another problem we have in today’s politically correct world some people are just waiting for someone to say or do something they deem offensive, some even try to bait people into acts they see as not politically correct just to bring them down. Sometimes it’s just a BS set up to bring down a successful person.

What has happened to many people in this world. We live in a world gone made.

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

I'm not sure how much uproar there was over the Giuliani comments, because I had to look it up before replying here. I'm not saying there wasn't any uproar, just that I honestly don't know. I do agree through that I had no problem with his comments.

He seemed to be saying the photographers following them around were there to get photos of her when she bent over to putt. Unfortunately, I could very well see where that comment would be true since there's a reason you can see photos like that of nearly every female celebrity all over the internet.

Had he instead said something like he had trouble concentrating on golf that day because he couldn't stop staring at her panties then I could see the issue with that comment. Don't get me wrong, even then the comment wouldn't be worthy of anyone getting fired, or having the response go beyond comments about how inappropriate the comments were though.

I think most guys would take a glance at an attractive woman in a similar situation if they're being honest about it. As long as they aren't creepy about it, or physically touch someone without consent or whatever then go for it I say. Most guys are simply going to do that though and not draw attention to the issue. I think you do cross a line into creepy when you stare to the point of being noticed, or decide to make a comment towards the female about it though.

I do not like witch hunts . .