Replies: 59
| visibility 2933
|
TigerNet Icon [152682]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35646
Joined: 2010
|
1.5% of the posters on tnet are making 98.5% of the...
24
24
Oct 18, 2023, 8:38 AM
|
|
whiney, complain about what Dabo said, posts. It's almost like he was right.
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
He is?
Oct 18, 2023, 8:40 AM
|
|
So 1.5% making 98.5% of complaining posts on Tigernet makes our offense suck? That's wild...
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Icon [152682]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35646
Joined: 2010
|
I'm sorry...
8
8
Oct 18, 2023, 8:42 AM
|
|
was that another complaint?
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
Just an observation this time***
Oct 18, 2023, 8:43 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20860]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 14648
Joined: 2009
|
Re: He is?
4
Oct 18, 2023, 9:13 AM
[ in reply to He is? ] |
|
2023 Offense > 2022 Offense >> 2021 Offense
Perhaps more whining will help Cade continue to age and develop, plus help Antonio Williams heal up and get back in the lineup for the remainder of the season.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
Yards per play
Oct 18, 2023, 9:15 AM
|
|
2021 103rd 2022 61st 2023 86th
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [31884]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16413
Joined: 2015
|
Sounds to me you wanted to keep Streeter....***
2
Oct 18, 2023, 9:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
I didn't want Streeter to begin with muchless keep him
1
Oct 18, 2023, 9:18 AM
|
|
what about 61st in yards per play would make anyone want to keep Streeter?
Besides, this isn't an OC problem. It's a position coach and talent/development problem.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Icon [152682]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35646
Joined: 2010
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
I'm not sure why you even keep harping on this....***
Oct 18, 2023, 9:22 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Icon [152682]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35646
Joined: 2010
|
I know why you are no longer harping on it.***
4
Oct 18, 2023, 9:24 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
I never did
Oct 18, 2023, 9:26 AM
|
|
I simply used it to compare multiple QBs ability to throw the ball accurately and nothing more and you ran with it as if I used it to compare the QBs overall.....I'm sorry that you weren't able to understand.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Icon [152682]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35646
Joined: 2010
|
Ok, let's use passing yards per game?
3
Oct 18, 2023, 9:27 AM
|
|
2021: 192.2 2022: 232.4 2023: 249.2
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
Passing yards per game to compare multiple QBs abilities
Oct 18, 2023, 9:29 AM
|
|
to be accurate? That does not correlate
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Icon [152682]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35646
Joined: 2010
|
Re: Passing yards per game to compare multiple QBs abilities
2
Oct 18, 2023, 9:30 AM
|
|
Wildblulou: "2023 Offense > 2022 Offense >> 2021 Offense"
You: "Yards per play 2021 103rd 2022 61st 2023 86th"
Me: "Ok, let's use passing yards per game? 2021: 192.2 2022: 232.4 2023: 249.2"
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
I'm sorry I thought we were referring back to the previous
Oct 18, 2023, 9:37 AM
|
|
argument of the lack of big play ability being a QB or WR problem.
YPG, RYG and PYG do not accurately describe how good an offense is. 200 rush yards per game with 100 pass does not make an offense good. 300 pass yards per game with 20 rush yards per game does not make an offense good. 400 yards per game with no big play ability and little scoring ability does not make an offense good.
Yards per play is a much better indicator of how efficiently offenses move the ball.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [23757]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 15273
Joined: 1995
|
I asked an expert.
1
Oct 18, 2023, 10:55 AM
|
|
When evaluating a college football offense, there isn't a single "best" stat to use because it often depends on the specific aspects of the offense you want to assess. Different statistics can provide valuable insights into different aspects of offensive performance. Here are some key statistics to consider and why they are important:
Total Yards: Total offensive yards gained (rushing + passing) can provide a general overview of an offense's ability to move the ball down the field. It reflects the overall productivity of the offense but doesn't tell the whole story.
Points Per Game (PPG): This statistic measures how many points the offense scores on average per game. Ultimately, the goal of an offense is to put points on the board, so PPG is an important metric.
Yards Per Play (YPP): YPP is a measure of efficiency and big-play capability. It can provide insights into how well an offense gains yards on each play. A high YPP often indicates an explosive offense.
Third-Down Conversion Rate: This statistic measures how successful an offense is at converting third-down opportunities. Sustaining drives and keeping possession of the ball is crucial, and a high third-down conversion rate can indicate a well-executed offense.
Red Zone Efficiency: Red zone statistics, including red zone touchdowns and red zone scoring percentage, show how effective an offense is when it gets close to the opponent's goal line. Scoring touchdowns instead of settling for field goals is often a sign of a potent offense.
Turnover Margin: While not strictly an offensive stat, turnover margin (takeaways minus giveaways) can significantly impact field position and the number of offensive opportunities. An offense that protects the ball well and forces turnovers can have a substantial advantage.
Time of Possession (TOP): TOP can reflect an offense's ability to control the clock and keep the opposing defense on the field. It's essential for managing the flow of the game and resting the defense.
Sacks Allowed: This stat measures the number of times the offensive line allows the quarterback to be sacked. Fewer sacks allowed indicates better pass protection and quarterback efficiency.
Rushing and Passing Yards: Separating rushing and passing yards can provide insights into the balance of an offense. It's important to consider how well an offense executes both aspects of the game.
Advanced Metrics: Advanced statistics like yards per attempt (YPA), passer rating (for quarterbacks), yards after catch (YAC), and more can provide a deeper understanding of an offense's performance, especially when combined with other statistics.
Ultimately, the "best" stat to use depends on your specific evaluation goals. To get a comprehensive picture of an offense, it's often useful to consider a combination of these statistics and analyze them in context, considering the team's style of play, opponent strength, and game situations.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
And your numbers further prove my point
Oct 18, 2023, 9:34 AM
[ in reply to Ok, let's use passing yards per game? ] |
|
Year PYG Y/A 2020: 390.5 13.24 (DJ's 2 starts) 2021: 192.2 6.0 2022: 232.4 6.8 2023: 249.2 6.7
But yet you blame this on QB talent.....
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Icon [152682]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35646
Joined: 2010
|
Well...
2
Oct 18, 2023, 9:53 AM
|
|
DJ started 13 games in 2022 (did not finish against UNC) and he averaged... 210.08 yards per game, had a 61.9% completion rate, and averaged 6.8 yards per attempt
Cade started 1 game and played most of a second with the same team and in those two games averaged... 299.5 yards per game, had a 64.1% completion rate, and averaged 7.68 yards per attempt
And DJ had some easy opponents to help pad his stats.
I'm not going to tell you what conclusions to draw from that data though.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Well...
Oct 18, 2023, 9:58 AM
|
|
The conclusion I draw is both are subpar #'s in terms of big play ability and offensive efficiency. It's not QB.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117416]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
You directly accused FM of defending something he did not...
3
Oct 18, 2023, 9:31 AM
[ in reply to I'm not sure why you even keep harping on this....*** ] |
|
You attacked others in a broad stroke for defending something with no real basis, but in the form of a back-handed personal attack.
And now you appear to be acting defensively and you're wondering the why?
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
I have absolutely no clue of what you are referring to with
Oct 18, 2023, 9:39 AM
|
|
any of this.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117416]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
Of that I've no doubt, which hopefully will cause you pause.***
2
Oct 18, 2023, 9:40 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Icon [152682]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35646
Joined: 2010
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Icon [152682]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35646
Joined: 2010
|
Nice work...
3
Oct 18, 2023, 10:16 AM
|
|
1) That is a list of stats. 2) I pointed out the flaw in your argument. I even said "I'm not saying I love Streeter or his play calling". 3) You linked the same post twice.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Nice work...
Oct 18, 2023, 10:20 AM
|
|
1. The purpose of the list of stats were to defend Streeter. 2. I never claimed you loved Streeter or his play calling. I said you defended him which you did. 3. My bad. I'll see where I err'd.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Icon [152682]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35646
Joined: 2010
|
Wrong...
3
Oct 18, 2023, 10:24 AM
[ in reply to Re: Nice work... ] |
|
again.
1) Read my first reply in that thread... "I don’t think the blame falls on any one person/position though, and that’s not my assertion here. I hear a lot of people blaming coaching, QB play, etc… for the recent 10 win seasons, and I thought this information was interesting for comparison purposes."
2) I defended math/logic, which I have said all along.
I see you have started making some assumptions in your replies now. That's never a good sign in a debate.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117416]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
It gets even more emotional when you're drowning, but careful...
3
Oct 18, 2023, 10:27 AM
|
|
any moment now he's going to rip ~you apart.
His words, not mine.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
What I said was "rip it apart"
1
Oct 18, 2023, 10:30 AM
|
|
meaning your point.
So not only have you accused me of some personal attack which I never did now you put words in my mouth. A+ for effort though...
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117416]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
I know what you meant/wrote that's why it's parethetically..
3
Oct 18, 2023, 10:32 AM
|
|
nuanced.
I led you to water, now you're apparently drowning and desperate.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
You can pretend that post wasn't purposeful to defend
Oct 18, 2023, 10:31 AM
[ in reply to Wrong... ] |
|
Streeter but I'm not buying it. Especially considering you went on to post that it wasn't fair to be critical of his play calling.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Icon [152682]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35646
Joined: 2010
|
Again...
3
Oct 18, 2023, 10:35 AM
|
|
You are the making the jump, not me. If someone makes a post about DJ, Dabo, Cade, Trevor, Streeter, Riley, Venables, Goodwin, etc, etc... but uses bad logic/math, and I point it out, it doesn't mean I'm "defending" that person because of the person, it means I'm defending math/logic and if someone is the beneficiary, so be it.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
You're ignoring the other posts
Oct 18, 2023, 10:40 AM
|
|
and focusing on that one and only post where you posted stats.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Icon [152682]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35646
Joined: 2010
|
How about this, the genesis...
2
Oct 18, 2023, 10:50 AM
|
|
CM Shack makes a claim, not supported by math or logic.
I use math to show his claim seems flawed.
https://www.tigernet.com/clemson-forum/message/thats-exactly-what-he-got-from-streeter,-no-scheme-and-no-32437456
From that, I've heard I think being ranked #48 is not bad, I am a Streeter defender, lover, supporter, etc.. Read his post. Read my response. Read every "defense" I have made since. I have defended math and logic. I have been clear. You "know what I meant" a lot. I say what I meant a lot.
Take a look at my third response, "I pointed out that he took a 100 ranked offense and turned it into an offense ranked 48, which shows substantial improvement. Doesn't mean I'm against Streeter being let go. Doesn't mean I disagree with Dabo. It doesn't mean anything, other than you don't understand math."
It can't be any clearer.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
Re: How about this, the genesis...
Oct 18, 2023, 10:53 AM
|
|
Yes you used "math and logic" to defend Streeter. We are on the same page now.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Icon [152682]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35646
Joined: 2010
|
"It doesn't mean anything...
3
Oct 18, 2023, 10:55 AM
|
|
other than you don't understand math."
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20860]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 14648
Joined: 2009
|
Cool. Now let's try Points per Game and Yards per Game?
Oct 18, 2023, 10:27 AM
[ in reply to Yards per play ] |
|
Considering a full game is an accumulation of executing all of those plays, it might be worth a look see.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Cool. Now let's try Points per Game and Yards per Game?
Oct 18, 2023, 10:39 AM
|
|
Sure.
PPG 2021 85th 2022 24th 2023 72nd
YPG 2021 98th 2022 41st 2023 62nd
However neither of these indicate offensive efficiency. They are skewed by other variables.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Elite [5257]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: 1.5% of the posters on tnet are making 98.5% of the...
3
Oct 18, 2023, 8:40 AM
|
|
Its normally the 80/20 rule..... Dabo has made it the 98.5/1.5 rule. He stepped it up a notch for sure!!
Go tigers !!!
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7167]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 10840
Joined: 2003
|
Re: 1.5% of the posters on tnet are making 98.5% of the...
1
Oct 18, 2023, 8:45 AM
|
|
Internet chatter is causing the team to suck. Internet negative chatter only started after Duke loss. I am baffled as why we lost to Dukke. Cause came after the effect????
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Icon [152682]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35646
Joined: 2010
|
I detect negative energy...
3
Oct 18, 2023, 8:47 AM
|
|
#1.5%
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
And if there's one thing we all know,
1
1
Oct 18, 2023, 8:49 AM
|
|
Dabo is right 100% of the time.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Icon [152682]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35646
Joined: 2010
|
^ How to say I'm a 1.5%er without saying I'm a 1.5%er.***
5
5
Oct 18, 2023, 8:50 AM
|
|
null
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117416]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
That one is all coot, so even 1.5%er is being generous.***
4
Oct 18, 2023, 8:51 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Is there a parrot in here?
1
1
Oct 18, 2023, 9:05 AM
|
|
"No but there is a coot! COOT!"
(Beat you to it)
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117416]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
Thanks, coot.***
3
Oct 18, 2023, 9:07 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117416]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
Nice of them to all cap words, so you know they're serious.***
5
5
Oct 18, 2023, 8:50 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14635]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
|
Re: 1.5% of the posters on tnet are making 98.5% of the...
2
Oct 18, 2023, 8:51 AM
|
|
That's true...100% of the time.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Conqueror [11587]
TigerPulse: 86%
46
Posts: 14639
Joined: 2004
|
if 98.5% are part of the solution....
1
3
Oct 18, 2023, 8:54 AM
|
|
you'd think it'd be fixed by now.....?...
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
They're not 98.5%ing hard enough***
Oct 18, 2023, 8:58 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [32927]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 18464
Joined: 2008
|
Re: 1.5% of the posters on tnet are making 98.5% of the...
2
Oct 18, 2023, 9:14 AM
|
|
Is this what is referred to as "fUzZY" or Common Core math?
TIA
|
|
|
|
 |
Associate AD [1052]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: 1.5% of the posters on tnet are making 98.5% of the...
Oct 18, 2023, 9:27 AM
|
|
We need reeducation camps for the 1.5%rs now! These camps will be ran by the 98.5%rs who will also determine the curriculum.
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Titan [50728]
TigerPulse: 79%
58
Posts: 37005
Joined: 2003
|
He's never been wrong, has he?***
1
Oct 18, 2023, 9:29 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20860]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 14648
Joined: 2009
|
Only trolls like yourself pull the 'Perfect Dabo' card on
3
Oct 18, 2023, 10:35 AM
|
|
here. It's part of your schtick to gloss over your constant negative narrative pimping.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [4090]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: 1.5% of the posters on tnet are making 98.5% of the...
3
Oct 18, 2023, 9:31 AM
|
|
whiney, complain about what Dabo said, posts. It's almost like he was right.
Thank you! I have confidence in Dabo snd this staff.
|
|
|
|
 |
Walk-On [126]
TigerPulse: 41%
11
|
Re: 1.5% of the posters on tnet are making 98.5% of the...
1
Oct 18, 2023, 10:19 AM
|
|
I 98.5% agree with this post 👍
|
|
|
|
Replies: 59
| visibility 2933
|
|
|