|
Replies: 90
| visibility 2102
|
All-Conference [422]
TigerPulse: 63%
17
|
Hey coots
Mar 4, 2013, 4:15 PM
|
|
I don't care how many of those crappie little tv spots you air Clemson will ALWAYS attract the top high school students in this state over you bunch of inbreds period !!
|
|
|
|
 |
Fan [63]
TigerPulse: 24%
7
|
Clowney, lattimore, Roland, Gilmore,
Mar 4, 2013, 4:35 PM
|
|
And others say other wise. Just a realistic point of view. Not bashing your enthusiasm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83641]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 63730
Joined: 2007
|
I don't think he was talking about...
Mar 4, 2013, 4:40 PM
|
|
those who are paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [12]
TigerPulse: 21%
2
|
Re: I don't think he was talking about...
Mar 4, 2013, 4:50 PM
|
|
> those who are paid
Only those paid by "rich uncles" then, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83641]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 63730
Joined: 2007
|
I'm just going to assume...
Mar 4, 2013, 5:01 PM
|
|
You get this
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2021]
TigerPulse: 81%
31
|
you're wrong too.
Mar 4, 2013, 8:40 PM
[ in reply to I don't think he was talking about... ] |
|
He was talking about HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS. NOT student ATHLETES. You know, that thing that college is really for? Like, giving an education to kids coming out of high school?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83641]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 63730
Joined: 2007
|
I knew what he was talking about***
Mar 4, 2013, 11:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
Like their athletes, SCU students don't go there for….
Mar 4, 2013, 11:59 PM
[ in reply to you're wrong too. ] |
|
education. They go there to act like white trash, get drunk and violent in 5 points, and only take a shower once a week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [59]
TigerPulse: 18%
6
|
Re: Like their athletes, SCU students don't go there for….
Mar 7, 2013, 3:52 PM
|
|
tell us more, oh great Oz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [46]
TigerPulse: 40%
5
|
Re: Like their athletes, SCU students don't go there for….
Mar 7, 2013, 4:39 PM
[ in reply to Like their athletes, SCU students don't go there for…. ] |
|
Please tell me that you don't really believe this. I'll assume you don't. But if you don't, why would you even say it? It says a lot more about you than it does about USC students.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
Hey coot, lived in the cootlumbia area my whole life….
Mar 7, 2013, 5:03 PM
|
|
have known people who have went there. Went down to 5 points during my college age years and witnessed the behavior of coot students first hand. The coot grads that are successful, are ones with degrees in international business and medical degrees. All the other ones basically went there for the reasons I listed already. Watch the news 79LawCock. Robberies, gun shootouts, and rapes are a common occurrence on SCU's campus. You can drive through the hood (oops I mean SCU's campus) any day, and you can see coot students who haven't taken a shower or put clothes on that aren't even anywhere close to half decent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [76]
TigerPulse: 28%
8
|
Re: Hey coot, lived in the cootlumbia area my whole life….
Mar 7, 2013, 5:30 PM
|
|
so as I said above, would you consider me getting a job at one of the biggest engineering firms in the country right out of school unsucessful?? Along with about 95% of engineers that I graduated with that also either got jobs or went to graduate school.
I was there for 4 years and saw nothing there that I didn't see from any other students at any other college I visited while I was in school, including Clemson, UNC, NC State, and Duke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
Just stop, before you make yourself look more foolish..
Mar 7, 2013, 5:36 PM
|
|
I've been to other college campus' and the white trash behavior of coots is second to none. Like I said before, stick to enjoying your recent wins over us in Football and Baseball instead of talking academics and the behavior of your students. Keep up with the news in cootlumbia, and you would know that robberies, gun shootouts, and rapes are common on SCU's campus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [76]
TigerPulse: 28%
8
|
Re: Just stop, before you make yourself look more foolish..
Mar 7, 2013, 5:43 PM
|
|
just be careful when you say that there are only two degrees that are worth anything...when my degree from USC led me to the same job that engineers from Clemson are landing
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
I don't have to be careful about anything, but anybody...
Mar 7, 2013, 5:51 PM
|
|
with any intelligent can tell that I meant that the international business degree and medical degrees have far higher success rates than other degrees at SCU. That doesn't mean you can't have success with those other degrees at SCU, it's just that it's more unlikely that you will have success. From living in the cootlumbia area my whole life, I have known far too many coots that have degrees outside of those two programs that I have mentioned, that have gotten nothing from their bachelor degrees. A lot of coot grads have to get an associate degree from Midlands Tech to be able to find a job that keeps them from being in the working poor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1245]
TigerPulse: 27%
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [879]
TigerPulse: 76%
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zealot [868]
TigerPulse: 50%
23
|
And all of those are in-state players
Mar 4, 2013, 5:05 PM
[ in reply to Clowney, lattimore, Roland, Gilmore, ] |
|
The fact is top rated recruits from other parts of the country seem to want to come to Clemson, not USuCk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [59]
TigerPulse: 18%
6
|
Re: And all of those are in-state players
Mar 7, 2013, 3:59 PM
|
|
good thing that's paid off the last four years.....oh wait.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3258]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
i'll see your clowney and latty with bowers and ellington,
Mar 4, 2013, 5:52 PM
[ in reply to Clowney, lattimore, Roland, Gilmore, ] |
|
and raise you a watkins,peake, and steward. who cares what state they come from!
Message was edited by: sgt tiger®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [55400]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 44245
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4785]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Clowney, lattimore, Roland, Gilmore,
Mar 6, 2013, 5:04 PM
[ in reply to Clowney, lattimore, Roland, Gilmore, ] |
|
Those guys grew up coot fans also. Let's not forget that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1210]
TigerPulse: 63%
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [160]
TigerPulse: 100%
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [16]
TigerPulse: 19%
2
|
Re: Hey coots
Mar 4, 2013, 6:03 PM
|
|
you tell 'em coots.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
^ lol can't even get that right***
Mar 6, 2013, 4:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [177]
TigerPulse: 100%
12
|
Re: Hey coots
Mar 4, 2013, 7:50 PM
|
|
I believe the OP is talking about the USuC commercials that have been airing lately in the upstate during local newscasts. It's the same promo that airs on espn when USuC is playing.
Message was edited by: TigerK729®
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
That ad has been airing in the Midlands too***
Mar 4, 2013, 11:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [12]
TigerPulse: 32%
2
|
Re: i'll see your clowney and latty with bowers and ellington,
Mar 4, 2013, 8:54 PM
|
|
Are you really comparing Bowers and Clowney? Has Peake and Steward even played meaningful minutes? No wonder Clemson can't beat USC right now. Next, you will compare the nations highest paid recruiting coordinator with Steve Spurrier. What a comeback my friend!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
Bowers is a more complete DE than Clowney…..
Mar 5, 2013, 12:04 AM
|
|
Clowney will have to add some weight, be more consistent, and get better against the run to play DE in the NFL, if not he will be a OLB in a 3-4 defense. Having said that, Clowney is a great player, but the flaws I have just mentioned are never brought up about him. If you watched the whole of SCU's games, there were a lot of games where Clowney was non existent. Sure Clowney had a lot of sacks, but between those sacks there were a lot of disappearing acts. But you're a coot fan so you don't know enough about football to realize those kinds of things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1245]
TigerPulse: 27%
27
|
You are partly correct
Mar 6, 2013, 4:32 PM
|
|
- he will have to add more weight - but he's now up to 273 pounds which is perfectly fine for a player his size with his speed - who still is a sophomore.
Jason Pierre Paul is a player that Clowney is often mentioned alongside- and Paul plays at 280 for the Giants. Clowney is taller than Paul (and faster) -and has received a ton more publicity than Paul did at similiar stages of their college careers.
Football playesr always have to be more consistent and Clowney is certainly no exception. His coaches have said that repeatedly.
I disagree on there "were a lot of games where Clowney was non existent." - To say that I'd say you weren't paying attention. While of course - like any other player- he didn't play 100% every play (no one does) - when Clowney wasn't pressuring the QB or sacking the QB, he was forcing quick passes, or forcing a team to run to the other side of the field effectively taking his side of the field away from the offense of the opponent. I've seen few defensive ends force as many bad passes or interceptions as did Clowney did last year.
Clowney only needs to avoid injury to be the 1st player taken next spring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2277]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: You are partly correct
Mar 6, 2013, 5:06 PM
|
|
The only reason why Clowney gets more AIR time than JPP is because of what conference he plays in. JPP played at USF. Of course he's not going to get the air time a SEC player gets.. you are talking out the side of your beak right now. Clowney is TERRIBLE against the run minus the ONE big tackle all season against Michigan I have saw teams countless times run AT him.. he runs himself out the play every time. case in point go watch the LSU game. and the FLORIDA game and tell me where Clowney was. I'll wait for your reply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1245]
TigerPulse: 27%
27
|
NFL scouts would disagree with you***
Mar 6, 2013, 5:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
NFL scouts also look at speed first before they look at tape
Mar 7, 2013, 5:19 PM
|
|
and NFL scouts haven't got to deeply analyze Clowney on tape yet, because they are still analyzing this years draft class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [158]
TigerPulse: 34%
12
|
Re: NFL scouts also look at speed first before they look at tape
Mar 8, 2013, 12:51 AM
|
|
> and NFL scouts haven't got to deeply analyze Clowney
> on tape yet, because they are still analyzing this
> years draft class.
This is funny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1245]
TigerPulse: 27%
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2557]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Excuse me for getting off topic for a moment, but I still
Mar 7, 2013, 2:28 PM
[ in reply to Re: You are partly correct ] |
|
never heard why Denard Robinson didn't play in the bowl game against USuC. Not implying it would have changed the outcome, just curious as to why I never heard. I'm usually pretty up on injuries, academic ineligibilities, etc. but never heard about Denard. As for my two cents about Clowney, the boy is beast. I hate that he is a coot, but there is no denying that he's the most dominant player in college ball right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [59]
TigerPulse: 18%
6
|
Re: Excuse me for getting off topic for a moment, but I still
Mar 7, 2013, 3:58 PM
|
|
Well, since all message board fans are apparently geniuses and all, I'm surprised you didn't realize that he did play, but wasn't at QB as he was injured earlier in the season. Played a bunch in that game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
He played receiver, the other guy who started was much...
Mar 7, 2013, 5:21 PM
[ in reply to Excuse me for getting off topic for a moment, but I still ] |
|
better at QB in the west coast style of offense that Michigan runs. Robinson only fits into RichRod's style of offense, and even in that offense his passing ability still was very suspect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18198]
TigerPulse: 94%
52
Posts: 28127
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2253]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: You are partly correct
Mar 6, 2013, 5:06 PM
[ in reply to You are partly correct ] |
|
I agree completely with your last sentence, however that is a mighty big "only needs" !! I don't wish him any harm though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1245]
TigerPulse: 27%
27
|
That's always the case
Mar 6, 2013, 5:26 PM
|
|
it's also the case with some Clemson players
an injury hurt Daquan Bowers and moved him down in the draft.
But as a sophomore right now- Clowney is set to be the 1st player taken in the NFL next year. That's extremely rare.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
Sam Bradford, Andrew Luck were set to….
Mar 7, 2013, 5:40 PM
|
|
and they stayed for one more year even though they sure fire number one picks. And the NFL is getting younger, so it's not as rare as you say it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1245]
TigerPulse: 27%
27
|
It's very rare
Mar 8, 2013, 8:08 AM
|
|
naming 2-3 player doesn't make it "not rare" - in fact - it confirms it
and Clowney hasn't even played his junior year yet.
Luck nor Bradford were considered the top pick until their junior years were half over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
Jason Pierre Paul is 6'8", Clowney is 6'6"…..
Mar 7, 2013, 5:08 PM
[ in reply to You are partly correct ] |
|
and sorry I don't buy that 273 pounds. We will see how much he weighs at the NFL Combine next year. Another thing, I don't even buy the weights Clemson publishes for it's players, as nearly every college over states weights and speed for their players.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18198]
TigerPulse: 94%
52
Posts: 28127
Joined: 2003
|
Where have you seen him listed as 6'8"? I thought he was
Mar 7, 2013, 5:31 PM
|
|
taller than 6'5" as well, but every link I have seen says 6'5"...
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1245]
TigerPulse: 27%
27
|
He's not - Paul is 6'5" - and that's his official height on
Mar 8, 2013, 8:11 AM
|
|
New York Giants website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
Did you watch the UT or LSU game or the Outback bowl….
Mar 7, 2013, 5:16 PM
[ in reply to You are partly correct ] |
|
other than his sack/fumble against UT, he did nothing in that game, which was the main reason why UT had a chance at the end of the game. Until, the play he was unblocked and forced a fumble, he was doing nothing against Michigan. If Clowney was doing more when he wasn't getting sacks, then you coots would have easily beat UT and Michigan, instead of the game going down to the last drive. And the LSU game is the main example of his smaller size and his ineffectiveness against the run. LSU ran the ball straight at Clowney the whole game, and Clowney was huffing and puffing against LSU in the mid way point of the 2nd qtr.
Like I said before, Clowney is a great player, but he still has much to improve on. And while he is a great player he isn't the transformative player the ESPN hype machine makes him to be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1245]
TigerPulse: 27%
27
|
As I said- NFL scouts and GM's would disagree with you
Mar 8, 2013, 8:12 AM
|
|
but I am sure they don't have nearly the footall IQ that you do on a college message board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14488]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 11103
Joined: 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1245]
TigerPulse: 27%
27
|
Except that's not what he said. Nice try though***
Mar 11, 2013, 9:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connoisseur [364]
TigerPulse: 18%
16
|
Re: Hey coots
Mar 4, 2013, 11:55 PM
|
|
Clemson just takes fewer students. They aren't attracting any more high quality students, USC just takes a few thousand borderline students making their numbers look worse.
Take the top 1000 in each incoming class and I'd be willing to bet they are very similar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
SCU takes about 35,000 below the borderline students in...
Mar 5, 2013, 12:22 AM
|
|
seriously to get into SCU you only have to have a 2.0 gpa in high school. Fact: Clemson's incoming students have much higher gpa's and higher SAT scores than incoming students at SCU.
The only degrees at SCU worth anything are their international business degree and their medical degrees, all the others are about the same as getting a GED. A few months ago I met a coot grad that got a bachelors in political science, but has a job working landscaping for a one truck landscaping company. I've met hundreds of coot grads over the years that have jobs that don't even require a HS diploma to work at said job.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [54]
TigerPulse: 18%
6
|
Re: SCU takes about 35,000 below the borderline students in...
Mar 6, 2013, 5:34 PM
|
|
Actually, the legislated minimum requirement for admission is a 3.0 and 1000 SAT. Out-of-state students at SC already average higher SATs, mostly because SCHC and Capstone attract higher-caliber students with their scholarship packages than Calhoun does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [48]
TigerPulse: 27%
5
|
Re: SCU takes about 35,000 below the borderline students in...
Mar 7, 2013, 11:31 AM
[ in reply to SCU takes about 35,000 below the borderline students in... ] |
|
That is a joke, USC has a the best international business program and one of the best Sports Management programs. SC is almost at Clemson's level for engineering and about to surpass Clemson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [37033]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 16331
Joined: 2008
|
But do they
Mar 7, 2013, 2:11 PM
|
|
"has a" the best grammar class too!!!
LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2557]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
They have to pass Eng 001 before they're allowed into
Mar 7, 2013, 2:33 PM
|
|
the remedial Eng 032. LOL!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
Engineering? You really must be on the crack pipe…..
Mar 7, 2013, 5:23 PM
[ in reply to Re: SCU takes about 35,000 below the borderline students in... ] |
|
by the way I stated that SCU's international business program was good, along with their medical degrees. SCU's sports management programs is nothing more than a sham to get their student athletes academically eligible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [76]
TigerPulse: 28%
8
|
Re: SCU takes about 35,000 below the borderline students in...
Mar 7, 2013, 3:36 PM
[ in reply to SCU takes about 35,000 below the borderline students in... ] |
|
Hmmmm, My engineering degree from USC seemed to be worth a position at one of the biggest engineering firms in the country...out of Greenville, where they recruit out of Clemson, USC and NC State
Along with 2 of my classmates who also got hired here
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5919]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: SCU takes about 35,000 below the borderline students in...
Mar 7, 2013, 5:59 PM
|
|
Who runs the Engineering labs at usc?
Where did he get his degree?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [76]
TigerPulse: 28%
8
|
Re: SCU takes about 35,000 below the borderline students in...
Mar 7, 2013, 3:38 PM
[ in reply to SCU takes about 35,000 below the borderline students in... ] |
|
and it's tough to get a job with a Poli Sci degree right out of college no matter where you graduate from...it just doesn't set you up for employment, that is a degree that is a stepping stone to graduate/law school
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [59]
TigerPulse: 18%
6
|
Re: SCU takes about 35,000 below the borderline students in...
Mar 7, 2013, 3:54 PM
|
|
hey, quit all this nonsense with facts, civility and rational thinking. It's going to start confusing people on here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
So a landscaping job is a stepping stone to graduate school
Mar 7, 2013, 5:31 PM
[ in reply to Re: SCU takes about 35,000 below the borderline students in... ] |
|
hahahahaha, you coots never cease to amaze me with your idiotic comments. Oh, you just helped me prove another point about SCU. They're building new law school facilities at SCU, even though the state of South Carolina already has too many lawyers (many who can't find work). Explain to me why would you invest money into a program that is very limited in it's job opportunities. I guess your law school grads can get the same landscaping jobs that your poli sci majors get. Oh wait, they will have to compete with Mexicans, Guatamalans, El Salvadorans, and Hondurans for those jobs. Wow, you just really proved my point about how worthless an SCU degree is. Your graduates have to compete with uneducated immigrants from Mexico and Central America.
Seriously, stick to enjoying your recent wins over us than trying to talk about academics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [76]
TigerPulse: 28%
8
|
Re: So a landscaping job is a stepping stone to graduate school
Mar 7, 2013, 5:41 PM
|
|
what the heck are you talking about, I said that a degree like Political Science doesn't lead to jobs no matter where you graduate from unless you want to work in Washington or in the State House
It's not surprising someone couldn't find a real job in this economy with just a Political Science degree. People get political science degrees so that they can go to law school or graduate school.
It has nothing to do with where the degree came from, it an issue of what skills and knowledge comes with the degree. A political science degree (regardless of what school it came from) comes with no skills and knowledge of a very specific subject that does not lead to many jobs. The same can be said about most liberal arts degrees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10883]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 12942
Joined: 2012
|
Sadly, this is true...My BFA is useless...that's why I got
Mar 7, 2013, 5:45 PM
|
|
another degree.
My advise to all prospective college students...get a degree where the JOBS are, for example, anything medical...
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
People get good paying jobs all the time that aren't related
Mar 7, 2013, 5:56 PM
[ in reply to Re: So a landscaping job is a stepping stone to graduate school ] |
|
to their degrees. Some times having a degree impresses an employer enough to hire you, even though your degree may not be directly related to the job. Again you're proving my point. Prospective employers take a look at an SCU degree, that is outside of the international business program and medical program, and take it with a grain of salt. That's totally different with a Clemson degree. Prospective employers know that getting any kind of Clemson degree means a whole lot.
Again, stick to enjoying your recent wins over us in Football and Baseball, and leave the academics alone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1245]
TigerPulse: 27%
27
|
No they don't - silly
Mar 8, 2013, 8:44 AM
|
|
I have plenty of Clemson friends that are looking for work - and struggle out of college.
People with liberal arts degrees are going to have to work their way up most of the time. They are not going to land a great job right out of college most of the time unless they have a connection or their degree says Harvard or something like it.
That's true in South Carolina- and true a lot of places unless you get lucky or work an internship while in school and ease right into a good job through the internship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1245]
TigerPulse: 27%
27
|
You are incorrect again
Mar 8, 2013, 8:24 AM
[ in reply to So a landscaping job is a stepping stone to graduate school ] |
|
BTW- where did you graduate from? I haven't seen you mention it.
We are building a new law school because lawyers in South Carolina want a new law school in Columbia and are putting their money behind the project.
The number of lawyers in South Carolina is in line with other similiar states. There aren't any more laywers in South Carolina than really anywhere else. (you were incorrect)
There are fewer lawyers in South Carolina per capita than states such as
Connecticut
Missouri
Nebraska
Iowa
Idaho
North Carolina
etc
In fact, South Carolina ranks 52 in the United States in the number of lawyers per capita - (District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico are including in the statistics)
http://lawschooltuitionbubble.wordpress.com/original-research-updated/lawyers-per-capita-by-state/
It's illogical to state that you don't build a law school because there are "so many" lawyers in the state. That has nothing to do with anything (and it's not incorrect too)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: Hey coots
Mar 5, 2013, 12:33 AM
|
|
All School in Div 1 have same requirement when it comes to be eligible to play a sport. So does it matter???
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
You're right.
Mar 6, 2013, 5:03 PM
|
|
No difference in West Virginia and Stanford academically...
facepalm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69946]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 41654
Joined: 2001
|
Thank you for making this post!
Mar 6, 2013, 4:50 PM
|
|
I have added more coots to my 'Ignore' list. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2776]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: Clowney, lattimore, Roland, Gilmore,
Mar 6, 2013, 6:34 PM
|
|
You Tell 'em Coot!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [8]
TigerPulse: 16%
1
|
Re: Hey coots
Mar 6, 2013, 7:30 PM
|
|
Better in what way? Please define and show the research that proves your point. This seems to be a very nebulous assertion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [39]
TigerPulse: 19%
4
|
Re: Bowers is a more complete DE than Clowney…..
Mar 6, 2013, 8:22 PM
|
|
^^^LOL!!!^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [630]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Clowney, One trick pony.***
Mar 7, 2013, 2:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19353]
TigerPulse: 92%
52
Posts: 22266
Joined: 2004
|
Re: Hey coots
Mar 7, 2013, 2:13 PM
|
|
lol @ all these Gamecocks who cant read.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1788]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: You are partly correct
Mar 7, 2013, 3:47 PM
|
|
The thing is Clowney won't be able to comprehend an NFL scheme or playbook, he's just that DUMB!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [59]
TigerPulse: 18%
6
|
Re: Hey coots
Mar 7, 2013, 3:51 PM
|
|
Look at me! I'm a grown man who thinks if I get on a message board and call people names, it makes me look awesome!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
LOL'd cuz you're on a rivals message board arguing with them***
Mar 7, 2013, 4:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [59]
TigerPulse: 18%
6
|
Re: LOL'd cuz you're on a rivals message board arguing with them***
Mar 7, 2013, 4:58 PM
|
|
rival's message board
not
rivals message board
the apostrophe shows possession
or it could be rivals' message board(s), but you would have to add the s, as it would be multiple message boards of rivals.
and who is arguing? Message boards are made for discussion, kind sir.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1788]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Re: SCU takes about 35,000 below the borderline students in...
Mar 7, 2013, 4:28 PM
|
|
You fellas must have the CLEANEST offices in Greenville!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [63]
TigerPulse: 24%
7
|
Re: Just stop, before you make yourself look more foolish..
Mar 7, 2013, 5:42 PM
|
|
The shooting and violence and drugs you speak of are everywhere, no more prominent among the college kids in Columbia than it is in Clemson. It's the bad part of society, nothing to do with the universities. Just in December a Clemson student was shot over drugs, it's horrible no matter where it happens, just know that it happens everywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
The level of crime happening in Columbia and SCU isn't...
Mar 7, 2013, 6:01 PM
|
|
happening at Clemson. You're a fool if you believe that. I didn't bring up drugs in the first place. Drugs are done on every campus in the nation. But the level of violence at SCU, is something unique to SCU. I would feel more safer on Benedict's campus than SCU's campus. That's how bad things have gotten at SCU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [554]
TigerPulse: 40%
20
|
Re: The level of crime happening in Columbia and SCU isn't...
Mar 7, 2013, 7:44 PM
|
|
that is true but it has much more to do with where the schools are located than it does the schools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24894]
TigerPulse: 94%
54
Posts: 17252
Joined: 2002
|
Is there a plan to move the USCheat campus ?
Mar 8, 2013, 8:34 AM
|
|
That area is NOT getting better. We all know that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1788]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2776]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: Hey coots
Mar 7, 2013, 7:58 PM
|
|
Inbred white trash (Coot fans) probably can't comprehend your OP brother!
They are to busy trying to keep up with the Drive Thru window, or bingo night in the trailor park!
Go Tigers!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [39]
TigerPulse: 19%
4
|
Re: The level of crime happening in Columbia and SCU isn't...
Mar 8, 2013, 8:11 AM
|
|
"More safer" Lol!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 90
| visibility 2102
|
|
|
50
