|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
All-TigerNet [10800]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7914
Joined: 10/18/16
|
EsecPN at it Again
Dec 18, 2019, 12:21 PM
|
|
I haven't watched in over week except for games but thought I would check out the Early Signing Show.
Although they acknowledged Clemson was #1, all the talk when I was watching was how Bama or LSU was going to move ahead of Clemson. I switched to Charlton Heston western.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2550]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1806
Joined: 10/21/15
|
Re: EsecPN at it Again
Dec 18, 2019, 12:27 PM
|
|
Between that and the impeachment fiasco I feel today is a good day for Gilligan's Island and MASH reruns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7173]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6879
Joined: 1/25/17
|
Hasn't guaranteed Bama
Dec 18, 2019, 12:28 PM
|
|
We will find out about LSU. But, Bama knows not to worry about if they have a better "graded class" than Clemson. We have beaten them with cumulative(5yr) classes outside the top 10 already. Them and Ohio State have had better rated players(on paper) the last time we played both.
It won't matter and ESPN can kiss my left "watcha-ma-call-it"!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [25872]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 20594
Joined: 7/31/07
|
Re: Hasn't guaranteed Bama
Dec 18, 2019, 12:31 PM
|
|
Typical SEC hype. If you look at the actual signings of these SEC schools, the ratings do not match up with their recruiting class. Alabama in particular does not have the recruits to have a #2 ranking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5072]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5618
Joined: 8/17/03
|
Re: Hasn't guaranteed Bama
Dec 18, 2019, 12:34 PM
|
|
I'm not sure about the ESPN rankings, but 247 has Bama with 3 5 stars and 18 4 stars. If that's not deserving to be in the conversation for the #2 class then I don't know what is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [65]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 109
Joined: 2/25/15
|
i saw a western last night with heston-he's a bad man
Dec 18, 2019, 12:29 PM
|
|
'three for texas' or something like that! married a saloon party girl
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [170]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 217
Joined: 2/19/12
|
Re: EsecPN at it Again
Dec 18, 2019, 12:30 PM
|
|
Watching NCIS , and then i go back to Mark Packer on ACCN .
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 49059
Joined: 5/16/04
|
Re: EsecPN at it Again
Dec 18, 2019, 12:32 PM
|
|
They hate us and are out to get us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34823]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 41036
Joined: 2/6/01
|
Watch UGA today.
Dec 18, 2019, 12:32 PM
|
|
They will always have some surprise commits, but that may stop now that Pittman has gone to Arkansas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11478]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9412
Joined: 10/3/12
|
Re: EsecPN at it Again
Dec 18, 2019, 12:34 PM
|
|
LSU just lost a 5 star WR to Maryland.
That won't exactly help them pass us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2079]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1762
Joined: 11/15/15
|
They will add a few stars to some Bama commits.
Dec 18, 2019, 12:34 PM
|
|
Bama's 6'0" 180lb QB commit jumped over 50 spots in Rivals to a 5*.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2723]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 2915
Joined: 9/16/18
|
Re: EsecPN at it Again
Dec 18, 2019, 12:36 PM
|
|
I swear you people only hear what you want to hear on espn.
The only reason they were talking about Bama or LSU jumping us was because they both still have a few highly rated recruits that are possibly going to commit. We do not. Therefore it is possible for them to jump us because the classes are so closely grouped together. Why would they not talk about who could end up being number one on a 4 hour show? I swear this board is full of softies. ESPN does NOT hate Clemson for gods sake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [25872]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 20594
Joined: 7/31/07
|
Re: EsecPN at it Again
Dec 18, 2019, 12:44 PM
|
|
If the shoe fits, you can't deny it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7173]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6879
Joined: 1/25/17
|
Not Hate - something different
Dec 18, 2019, 12:44 PM
[ in reply to Re: EsecPN at it Again ] |
|
It's not hate.
News is supposed to be impartial. You are supposed to as a Legit news or sports outlet be "impartial". This is what you confuse as Hate TigerLife2005. If you are going to cover top contenders - I feel people are saying, "give out the same amount of time"! If not, just stop pretending that you are impartial.
***I get it. Alabama, Ohio State, etc. have huge fan bases who want to see their team on tv. They are probably under a tremendous amount of stress from schools like them about "getting more coverage"! Yes, "more". The term little old Clemson is perfect and describes out I vision alumni from those big fan base schools who are unhappy ESPN spends time covering us.
Which would be fine - but just come out and say it! Don't pretend the rest of college football doesn't exist to satisfy the $$$$$$.
As I said earlier, Clemson has beaten these teams who have "MAY" end up with a higher class than us before with composite classes outside the top 10. No need to think that a class in the top 3 would hurt our chances of continuing to be able to play with those squads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5072]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5618
Joined: 8/17/03
|
Re: Not Hate - something different
Dec 18, 2019, 12:59 PM
|
|
How does the OP know that ESPN hadn't just finished up a long segment about Clemson just before he turned the channel on, or spent a long segment talking about Clemson shortly after he turned off the channel?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [352]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 200
Joined: 3/18/14
|
Re: EsecPN at it Again
Dec 18, 2019, 12:46 PM
|
|
When flipping channels yesterday I did hear Pawl say Alabama had the #1 recruiting class and the #1 QB prospect from California...…..
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30764]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 34460
Joined: 6/22/03
|
ESPN has to find a way to justify putting 12 sec
Dec 18, 2019, 1:05 PM
|
|
Teams in the top10.
This is where it starts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
