|
Replies: 37
| visibility 1976
|
Game Changer [1677]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
8
8
Nov 1, 2025, 4:11 PM
|
|
b/c it did. Without it, we kneel and win.
However… the defense and critical playcalling put us in a position where a DPI could lose the game, which it did.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [3749]
TigerPulse: 64%
35
|
The PI did not
3
3
Nov 1, 2025, 4:14 PM
|
|
lose the game. If you think that then that is part of the problem. Excuses with zero accountability
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1677]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Do you read?***
Nov 1, 2025, 4:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3749]
TigerPulse: 64%
35
|
Your initial statement makes no sense
1
Nov 1, 2025, 4:17 PM
|
|
Double negatives all over the place
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5006]
TigerPulse: 93%
37
|
Re: Your initial statement makes no sense
3
Nov 1, 2025, 4:22 PM
|
|
It's a perfectly understandable sentence if you have anything above a room temp IQ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3491]
TigerPulse: 94%
34
|
Wrong ...
Nov 1, 2025, 5:46 PM
[ in reply to Your initial statement makes no sense ] |
|
he didn't use any double negatives. FYI a double negative isn't simply when a sentence has two negative words in it. They have to be used in a cancelling or contradictory way for it to be a real double negative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62380]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 45932
Joined: 2003
|
In a word..."No".***
1
Nov 1, 2025, 4:21 PM
[ in reply to Do you read?*** ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [257]
TigerPulse: 100%
14
|
Re: Do you read?***
Nov 1, 2025, 8:04 PM
[ in reply to Do you read?*** ] |
|
He doesnt
What you said made sense.
Maybe another way to say it is the DPI took the win away from us, which it did
But defensive play cost us the game. And actually, to he fair, failed kick coverage also contributed to that.
I suppose you can say that the throw to PGrass cost us, but had we run three times, ypu.dont know we would.have gotten in the EZ. I think we would have, but no way to say for certain. I think it was yet another dumb call too cute.by half.
So, defense (mostly in first half) and failed kick coverage cost us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [412]
TigerPulse: 97%
17
|
Re: The PI did not
1
Nov 1, 2025, 4:21 PM
[ in reply to The PI did not ] |
|
Dude he/she is saying it shouldn’t have come to that but it did cause us to lose
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [257]
TigerPulse: 100%
14
|
Re: The PI did not
5
5
Nov 1, 2025, 4:23 PM
[ in reply to The PI did not ] |
|
lose the game. If you think that then that is part of the problem. Excuses with zero accountability
lose the game. If you think that then that is part of the problem. Excuses with zero accountability
This is wrong
Refs can effect game. And you.can play bad, take accountability for the fixes
Both can be true at the same time.
Otherwise, refs can call back every TD you socre on questionable calls, and you have to say is on the team for not finding a way to win
They didnt play great on defense, but they did enough to win ... and this case w 40 secs to go, a very questionable call gave Duke more snaps and made Clemson have to do more than what it it takes w no time left
Defense wasn't perfect and special teams blew it, but refs awful call at critical moment after defense, had in fact, won the series, did contribute
Both can be true. Clemson needs to be better and refs need to not blow calls at decisive moments in the game.
Otherwise, why have quality standards for refs at all?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3391]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
1
Nov 1, 2025, 4:14 PM
|
|
Hoped the ACC does what the SEC did and not let them ref any more this season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2484]
TigerPulse: 94%
32
|
did you forget who we played?***
Nov 1, 2025, 4:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [257]
TigerPulse: 100%
14
|
Re: did you forget who we played?***
1
Nov 1, 2025, 4:46 PM
|
|
This
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2484]
TigerPulse: 94%
32
|
I think most can figure that out***
Nov 1, 2025, 4:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [101]
TigerPulse: 90%
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3749]
TigerPulse: 64%
35
|
The defense lost the game way before the PI.
1
1
Nov 1, 2025, 4:16 PM
|
|
Nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1270]
TigerPulse: 86%
27
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
Nov 1, 2025, 4:17 PM
|
|
the DPI call didnt lose the game
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3391]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
Nov 1, 2025, 4:19 PM
|
|
You do know if it’s not called Clemson would have won?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62380]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 45932
Joined: 2003
|
Remember the Georgia baseball game we lost by one run in Extra inngs
2
Nov 1, 2025, 4:24 PM
|
|
And we were tied at the end of the game bevmcause the Umps in Athens ruled a homerun a foul ball....AND THE REPLAY CLEARLY SHOWED IT TWO FEET INSIDE THE POLE....WE WOULD HAVE WON IT IN 9...but people on here STILL said it didn't cost us the game because it happened in the 6th in ing or some such nonsense..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [9]
TigerPulse: 71%
1
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
1
Nov 1, 2025, 5:38 PM
[ in reply to Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game ] |
|
You do know if it’s not called Clemson would have won?
Actually yes. Duke had two timeouts with under 50 seconds left, meaning three kneel downs and maybe a launched ball out of bounds is a guaranteed win
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [83825]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 31313
Joined: 2018
|
Kneel downs?
Nov 1, 2025, 9:51 PM
|
|
### is a kneel-down, cockeater? Or is this lunge droppings again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [38709]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
1
Nov 1, 2025, 4:18 PM
|
|
You are correct sir.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [519]
TigerPulse: 97%
19
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
1
Nov 1, 2025, 4:18 PM
|
|
No our multi-million dollar DC did by continuing to put the worst defense since Kevin Steele’s 2011 defense on the field again.
Tom Allen is a joke, wish he stayed at Penn State so he could have been fired this year mid season bc he needs to be fired here
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [412]
TigerPulse: 97%
17
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
Nov 1, 2025, 4:23 PM
|
|
You’re so ignorant just like many other “Clemson fans”
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [-33]
TigerPulse: 57%
-1
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
1
Nov 1, 2025, 7:26 PM
|
|
Fans turning against each other. The end is near.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [9]
TigerPulse: 71%
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4828]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
Nov 1, 2025, 4:20 PM
|
|
We were playing DUKE?!?! That PI call hurt but DID NOT lose the game for us. Them knifing through our defense, scoring on their first three possessions, running a kick back, converting 5 of 5 on 4th down - in our home stadium(!!) cost us the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28419]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16782
Joined: 2018
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
2
Nov 1, 2025, 4:23 PM
|
|
Now you know how boxers feel when a bout goes to a decision…
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1146]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
1
Nov 1, 2025, 5:42 PM
|
|
That's a great analogy for it. When you put the game in the refs hands ya kind of have to live with the consequences. Yes it stinks to high heaven that an imbecile made a bad call that gave Duke another opportunity but why are we in that position to begin with?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [213]
TigerPulse: 98%
13
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
1
Nov 1, 2025, 4:28 PM
|
|
Exactly!!!
I’m so sick of hearing this “never should’ve been in that situation” bull crap. Yeah, we should’ve, because we SUCK right now. And when we suck, we need the refs to do their #### job.
That call flat-out lost the game.
I hope the Clemson coaches, players, and media call that garbage out, loud and clear.
And spare the “one call didn’t lose it” talk in the media and on the message boards. Yes it literally did. We were in that situation, whether we should’ve been or not. And while in that situation, we literally lost because of that call.
It’s ok to blame on the refs when said blame is due and accurate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [257]
TigerPulse: 100%
14
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
1
Nov 1, 2025, 4:51 PM
|
|
Exactly!!!
I’m so sick of hearing this “never should’ve been in that situation” bull crap. Yeah, we should’ve, because we SUCK right now. And when we suck, we need the refs to do their #### job.
That call flat-out lost the game.
I hope the Clemson coaches, players, and media call that garbage out, loud and clear.
And spare the “one call didn’t lose it” talk in the media and on the message boards. Yes it literally did. We were in that situation, whether we should’ve been or not. And while in that situation, we literally lost because of that call.
It’s ok to blame on the refs when said blame is due and accurate.
Agree
We shouldn't have been in that position where.thr call mattered. True. We need to fix that.
But regardless, we are not a good team and we're in that position. We did enough to win over 4 quarters. And the call cost us the win.
We want to get back to where bad calls dont matter bc we are able to do 130% of what os needed, so we overcome it
But right now, the made one more play than Duke, refs extended Dukes possession, and thats that
We want to ne better. Refs need to do better so they dont change the rules on us when we have the game won..both can be true.
Otherwise why demand quality from refs at all?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [9]
TigerPulse: 71%
1
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
1
Nov 1, 2025, 5:33 PM
|
|
I think that it was a terrible call, but in the end it was still a sad performance. Our defense had more holes than most brands of Swiss cheese, especially right up the middle and in the flats. The call shouldn't have been that critical because they should have still been at their own 20. Our offense was excellent, but the no-name slip pass to the O lineman was a poor decision that could have saved the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [257]
TigerPulse: 100%
14
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
Nov 1, 2025, 8:07 PM
|
|
Yep
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [-33]
TigerPulse: 57%
-1
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
Nov 1, 2025, 5:42 PM
|
|
Huge loser-energy post
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2061]
TigerPulse: 97%
31
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
Nov 1, 2025, 8:09 PM
|
|
If we were 7-0/6-1, we would have gotten the call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3149]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
Nov 1, 2025, 8:17 PM
|
|
If we’re making this argument in support of our record in making our case to be selected for CFP I’m with you. But this is our fifth loss, to unranked Duke, at home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [30994]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 21440
Joined: 2024
|
Re: You cant say the DPI call didnt lose the game
Nov 1, 2025, 9:52 PM
|
|
We gave up 46 points.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [199]
TigerPulse: 45%
12
|
Don't care at this point
Nov 1, 2025, 9:58 PM
|
|
There were many other missed opportunities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 37
| visibility 1976
|
|
|
50
