|
Replies: 14
| visibility 2116
|
CU Medallion [18901]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 13655
Joined: 2003
|
Did we end up with 0 penalties last night?
6
6
Dec 8, 2024, 9:30 PM
|
|
I can’t recall one? If so, great job by our team staying focused on the little things. We needed it all
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [16709]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
Re: Did we end up with 0 penalties last night?
3
Dec 8, 2024, 9:32 PM
|
|
I don't think we had one either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1018]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: Did we end up with 0 penalties last night?
Dec 8, 2024, 10:47 PM
|
|
We had zero,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12188]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
Re: Did we end up with 0 penalties last night?
3
Dec 8, 2024, 9:33 PM
|
|
Yes. First time since our game against ND last year. And before that 70 years or something like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18901]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 13655
Joined: 2003
|
Actually thats probably more impressive. The refs not helping the Leprechauns
2
Dec 8, 2024, 9:35 PM
|
|
A single time 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [835]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: Did we end up with 0 penalties last night?
4
Dec 8, 2024, 9:34 PM
|
|
We had a cheap roughing the kicker called against us but SMU declined it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16761]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 18113
Joined: 1999
|
It was Running into the Kicker5 yard penalty. Wouldnt give them a first down
2
Dec 8, 2024, 9:39 PM
|
|
so they kept the 3 points.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [835]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: It was Running into the Kicker5 yard penalty. Wouldnt give them a first down
1
Dec 8, 2024, 5:50 PM
|
|
Yes, I know. The penalty was declined, so it did not count. But honestly, The flag should have never been thrown in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2053]
TigerPulse: 97%
31
|
Yes, and there were still morons on here complaining
1
Dec 8, 2024, 9:48 PM
|
|
about the refs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1419]
TigerPulse: 100%
29
|
Re: Yes, and there were still morons on here complaining
2
Dec 8, 2024, 10:22 PM
|
|
Reason for complaints:
No call for the face mask on Cade with the ref standing 5 feet away in full view. The penalty would have given us a first down rather than having to punt on a critical drive late in the game while we were trying to run out the clock.
Message was edited by: Tiger68®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [80460]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 44348
Joined: 2004
|
that was bad. the center judge was looking right at it, started to
1
Dec 8, 2024, 11:33 PM
|
|
pull out the flag but then didn't. weird, huh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9285]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: that was bad. the center judge was looking right at it, started to
Dec 9, 2024, 5:27 AM
|
|
Is it weird?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8941]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 11821
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Yes, and there were still morons on here complaining
1
Dec 9, 2024, 12:00 AM
[ in reply to Yes, and there were still morons on here complaining ] |
|
SMU is a heavily penalized team. #4 in the country, I believe. It's entirely possible that the refs missed a few of SMU's violations. They do seem to commit a bunch of violations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [103090]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 99036
Joined: 2009
|
They missed two facemask calls which would have kept two drives alive for us.
Dec 9, 2024, 6:00 AM
[ in reply to Yes, and there were still morons on here complaining ] |
|
One on Cade when he was sacked and one of Mafah when he was tackled on the sideline.
The other was on a defensive lineman who was being held by the facemask in pursuit of SMU's QB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [102627]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 26408
Joined: 2006
|
Yes***
2
Dec 8, 2024, 9:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 2116
|
|
|
50
