Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Capehart
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 27
| visibility 5017

Capehart

3

Jan 1, 2025, 12:35 PM

If he can’t return, we have to find an experienced DT in the portal. If he does come back, we’re probably good.

I think we are fine at DE for right now.

LB and S make the most sense to me.

Hoping Dabo announces the new DC soon. Let them go recruit their guys from the portal.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart

4

Jan 1, 2025, 12:41 PM

Green would start along with Woods

Burley
Brown-Shuler
Thompson

I think the room is fine.

We NEED a safety. Barnes isn’t even good there and he’s a lock to start. Other than that you have Griffin 18 and Ricardo jones who is NOT fast enough to cover downfield

Safety is the only position of concern heading into 2025

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Capehart

1

Jan 1, 2025, 1:25 PM

I agree I really think we need to go make a splash and get a good experienced safety. Think we need to improve there. The DTs will be fine imo so safety is a big need imo and also a good LB wouldnt be nice tho maybe crayton or Anderson can come on at LB. Go Tigers!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart


Jan 1, 2025, 1:25 PM [ in reply to Re: Capehart ]

No, LB is of concern too as is a punter.

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We have a lot of players at LB. Not signing any portal kids here.***


Jan 1, 2025, 1:31 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart


Jan 1, 2025, 3:41 PM [ in reply to Re: Capehart ]

Does Daniel HS have a good punter?

2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart


Jan 1, 2025, 3:43 PM [ in reply to Re: Capehart ]

Well I agree but the coaches seem fixed on having 2 starters. I def would love to see us get a LB and 2 safeties personally

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Capehart


Jan 1, 2025, 1:28 PM [ in reply to Re: Capehart ]

Woods, Green and Burley would be the only DTs with experience.

We’d need to add depth from the portal. We’ve been through this before.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart


Jan 1, 2025, 1:50 PM [ in reply to Re: Capehart ]

I am hoping that we have a guy that may be overlooked so far that will vastly improve at safety. Hannifin got on the field almost immediately after being moved from wr so with an off season to continue to learn the position, he may be a budding starter. He seems speedy and is a terror on special teams.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart

1

Jan 1, 2025, 2:04 PM [ in reply to Re: Capehart ]

Sound take here. Green was pretty good in backup duty. One of the brighter spots on the 2 deep. I think Adam’s will play right away also. A good added piece.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart


Jan 1, 2025, 2:34 PM [ in reply to Re: Capehart ]

I agree about Barnes. I think he would be better at linebacker where he has to manly cover tight ends or running backs. He had gotten too big to cover speedy guys.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart


Jan 1, 2025, 1:22 PM

Woods
Burley
Green
Thompson
Shuler
Adams

If everyone is healthy I think we are fine unless Thompson, Shuler, and Adams are all duds which I don’t think is true.

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart


Jan 1, 2025, 1:29 PM

It’s not fine only having 3 DTs with experience.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart

2

Jan 1, 2025, 1:36 PM

So go after a mediocre portal DT that has experience and risk losing Shuler or Thompson? No thank you. I’ll leave that call to Eason. He knows what we have. If he thinks the talent is there then we have the numbers.

We knew we didn’t have the numbers on DE. We had to go get someone and we still lost Hoffler. I just don’t think we need to go into the portal for a DT unless Shuler and Thompson are duds which only the coaches know that.

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart


Jan 1, 2025, 2:15 PM

If Capehart can’t return, then we lose 3 DTs. We only signed 2.

Sounds like a spot would be open. Hope this helps.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart


Jan 1, 2025, 1:24 PM

We are good with only two DEs?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart


Jan 1, 2025, 1:30 PM

Lawson and Denhoff have started games. Having both of them as backups is fine.

Watford and Mayo were highly recruited.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart

1

Jan 1, 2025, 1:43 PM

Sorry but I don’t count Lawson and Denhoff as reliable depth. They are purely bodies. They were liabilities all season. We have to hope Mayo and Watford live up to their billing. I have more faith in Shuler and Thompson as backups at DT than those two at DE.

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart


Jan 1, 2025, 1:46 PM

I think two DE that started multiple games is more then reliable depth. A transfer at this point was probably a backup at their original school.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart


Jan 1, 2025, 2:16 PM

I agree. Having two backups with starter experience is rare.

Plus, Mayo and Watford are still there.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart

1

Jan 1, 2025, 2:30 PM [ in reply to Re: Capehart ]

What exactly is reliable depth to you? You're not going to get high level starters as backups.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart

1

Jan 1, 2025, 2:16 PM

Capehart doesn't matter. We have younger faster DT ready to play and chomping at the bit. DT will be a strong point.

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Capehart


Jan 1, 2025, 2:37 PM

Would Story not make the 2 deep if cape doesn’t come back? He was the only DT we got when Nick Eason joined the staff.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart

3

Jan 1, 2025, 2:54 PM

Capehart is not a loss.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart


Jan 1, 2025, 3:26 PM

Rolling into 2025 with only 3 DTs with any meaningful experience is a mistake.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart

1

Jan 1, 2025, 3:59 PM

Him and Tre suck man, not a loss. Playing some young guys is no different but with actual upside. We know what those two are and they are not good.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Capehart


Jan 1, 2025, 4:32 PM

Go get someone from the portal instead. We’d be losing 3 DTs, with 2 signees. There’d be an open spot for us.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Dexter Lawrence was better as an inexperienced


Jan 1, 2025, 4:24 PM

freshman and sophomore than Capeheart will ever be. Capeheart should not be that hard to replace. If he’s not a complete bust he’s close.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 27
| visibility 5017
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic