|
Replies: 32
| visibility 3022
|
Letterman [163]
TigerPulse: 91%
12
|
Cade or Tajh?
Apr 12, 2025, 9:06 PM
|
|
Who would you rather have behind center this year when the cannon goes off and LSU is in Death Valley?
Different times, different systems. Just curious
|
|
|
|
 |
Solid Orange [1360]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
6
6
Apr 12, 2025, 9:12 PM
|
|
The first team All American, 3 time all acc, ACC player of the year. Tajh Boyd, no question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4137]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
4
Apr 12, 2025, 9:12 PM
|
|
Love Cade, but Tajh threw a beautiful deep ball and that could make a difference with scoring major points with the wide receiver core we have. Nevertheless, Tajh had NFL talent with Watkins and Hopkins (Nuk) running routes. (Not trying to take anything away from Boyd). Cade seems to be better with his legs. The only big play I remember Tajh making with his legs was against Ohio State in the 2013 Orange Bowl and boy did he turn in the jets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [16018]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
1
Apr 12, 2025, 10:11 PM
|
|
Tajh could get that 3rd and one or two with his legs every time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17006]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
Apr 13, 2025, 9:43 AM
[ in reply to Re: Cade or Tajh? ] |
|
I guess you forgot how Tajh was third and automatic anything under three yards. The dude was a bulldozer.
I’d have loved to see Tajh with the supporting cast from 2018. He had no o line, no defense, and still put up video game numbers.
Cade is great as well. He’s only had a real WR room for one season and his numbers were insane. 36 TD 4 INT. 3600+ yards. I’ll take Cade. He is pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6694]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
Apr 12, 2025, 9:17 PM
|
|
Tajh had DeAndre Hopkins, Sammy Watkins, and Martavis Bryant.
No offense, but those first two are better than anyone on our current team.
So to judge Cade against that, is unfair.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [163]
TigerPulse: 91%
12
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
Apr 12, 2025, 9:24 PM
|
|
I agree. That’s why I said different times. Tough comparison. Neither can be compared against Trev or DW though. That’s what was interesting to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [425]
TigerPulse: 97%
17
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
Apr 12, 2025, 10:05 PM
|
|
Gotta jump in & agree. It was almost impossible to overthrow Sammy Watkins, If Cade had him on the field his deep ball passing would be viewed completely different
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7901]
TigerPulse: 98%
42
|
i want it to be Cade Klubnik
1
Apr 12, 2025, 9:18 PM
|
|
But in big time games , it's hard to qualify
Tennessee (bad offense) loss
Florida State (fumble 6) loss
Georgia (bad offense) loss
SMU win
Texas loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7901]
TigerPulse: 98%
42
|
a key note that in all of those losses
1
Apr 12, 2025, 9:21 PM
|
|
he had zero tall WRs
and had practically zero playing with high talented WRs versus big time opponents
Tennessee- that DJU Clemson Oline and was the worst
Antonio Williams didn't play FSU
Wesco and Moore barely got PT vs Uga
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7901]
TigerPulse: 98%
42
|
i take Cade 10/10 times
2
Apr 12, 2025, 9:23 PM
[ in reply to i want it to be Cade Klubnik ] |
|
i think he's grinded it out with a depleted Clemson and this is the first year he has a roster that he came to Clemson to play with
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5610]
TigerPulse: 96%
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4843]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Tajh***
1
Apr 12, 2025, 9:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [14011]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [16018]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
|
Re: The game is against LSU so,
1
Apr 12, 2025, 10:17 PM
|
|
Won't ever forget!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [50649]
TigerPulse: 79%
58
Posts: 36963
Joined: 2003
|
Tajh.
1
Apr 12, 2025, 9:36 PM
|
|
Both are great but Tajh is the better QB IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3522]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
1
Apr 12, 2025, 9:38 PM
|
|
I would love to say Cade but I am going with Tajh. Hopefully by the end of the of the year I will say Cade. These receivers are really good and Cade should have multiple 300+ passing yard games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [14011]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
|
The good news is we got em both
2
Apr 12, 2025, 9:42 PM
|
|
Cade on the field Tajh coaching him up
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [906]
TigerPulse: 97%
24
|
Re: The good news is we got em both
Apr 12, 2025, 9:51 PM
|
|
Slight edge to Tajh, so far has been more “clutch” than Cade.
Cade has improved slightly in this category ( see SMU and Pitt wins) but he also has sometimes makes mistakes at key times (2023 FSU OT, Miami OT, 2024 Coots last drive INT)
I would say Tajh had the clutch gene and the jury is still out on whether or not Cade has it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [649]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
Apr 12, 2025, 9:54 PM
|
|
Both-the great news is we don't have to choose
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24564]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 16549
Joined: 2024
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
Apr 12, 2025, 9:54 PM
|
|
Probably Tajh. I think it would go off with this team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [681]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
2
Apr 12, 2025, 9:55 PM
|
|
As of right now, Tajh, but that could change after this season
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24564]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 16549
Joined: 2024
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
Apr 12, 2025, 9:56 PM
|
|
That's how I feel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4817]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
Apr 12, 2025, 9:56 PM
|
|
Tajh. Mostly because of Tajh’s tough running ability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1732]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
Apr 12, 2025, 9:56 PM
|
|
Cade all day long.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [163]
TigerPulse: 91%
12
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
Apr 12, 2025, 10:11 PM
|
|
Same here but love to hear the different perspectives
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5045]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Cade. Tajh was too loose with the ball at times.
Apr 12, 2025, 10:08 PM
|
|
Nice to have choice, but give me Cade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [163]
TigerPulse: 91%
12
|
Re: Cade. Tajh was too loose with the ball at times.
Apr 12, 2025, 10:17 PM
|
|
Same here. Love Tajh. I don’t think many people replying to this post had the same attitude when he was playing. He was heavily criticized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4795]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
Apr 13, 2025, 2:15 AM
|
|
Give me Cade. Tajh Boyd was awesome but I think Cades significantly quicker and can rip off long runs(see pitt). We finally get to see what Cade looks like with talent around him and a run game. The Louisville game on no one was threatened by the run game(fairly certain they were the first to decide and test how injured Mafah was and if Clemson had trust worthy depth at rb) and knew they could tee off on the QB and play aggressive pass defense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4265]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
Apr 13, 2025, 5:58 AM
|
|
Tahj was one of the purest passers I’ve seen. It just looked smooth and his passes were just good looking throws. I’ve always thought Cades deep throws look unusually high. Maybe it’s just me, but they just seem to go far higher than other’s deep throws and don’t look “normal”.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [302]
TigerPulse: 100%
15
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
Apr 13, 2025, 8:34 AM
|
|
both are great quarterbacks, Im taking Cade though. Dual threat and familiar with the team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1518]
TigerPulse: 92%
30
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
Apr 13, 2025, 2:16 PM
|
|
The one that has a win against SC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10158]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: Cade or Tajh?
Apr 13, 2025, 2:17 PM
|
|
Tajh Boyd....Cade could change my mind this season
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 32
| visibility 3022
|
|
|
50
