|
Replies: 23
| visibility 2056
|
Gridiron Giant [15546]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 13448
Joined: 2013
|
Biden has been diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer
4
May 18, 2025, 4:35 PM
|
|
I’ve been dealing with stage 2 for almost two years now. Thankfully mine isn’t aggressive.
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [17320]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 18215
Joined: 2015
|
Dems will do anything to get rid of him***
2
May 18, 2025, 4:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6915]
TigerPulse: 89%
41
Posts: 13763
Joined: 2008
|
Another earth shaking lie
1
4
May 18, 2025, 4:53 PM
|
|
by the democrats.
No way they are just now discovering this. Surely they were doing tests for prostate cancer. If you have PC, it’s almost certain your PSA will be hugely elevated, thus warranting further investigation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Champion [121406]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 77793
Joined: 2003
|
Re: Another earth shaking lie
8
8
May 18, 2025, 5:02 PM
|
|
Did you even read the OP, or jump to conclusions? He was diagnosed yesterday. He probably will not live the rest of the year, but go ahead and make this about you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27233]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 18307
Joined: 2024
|
Re: Another earth shaking lie
May 18, 2025, 5:07 PM
|
|
6 months to 5 years at best. Yeah he will be gone somewhat soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [15546]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 13448
Joined: 2013
|
Re: Another earth shaking lie
May 18, 2025, 5:50 PM
|
|
Yeah he will.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16293]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
Re: Another earth shaking lie
1
May 18, 2025, 8:48 PM
[ in reply to Re: Another earth shaking lie ] |
|
Not necessarily. If Biden doesn’t die from another cause, his prostate cancer will ultimately take him out, but even with his incurable situation, he may live years yet.
He’s already 82 which is longer than most of us will be around.
I do not believe there was any cover up of this issue, but after listening to an excerpt of Biden’s interview with Robert Hur, it is painfully obvious that there was a massive coverup of Biden’s mental decline and that most definitely needs to be fully investigated. Who was behind the gas lighting BS telling us Biden was fine and in charge? Who was actually in charge?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11627]
TigerPulse: 98%
46
Posts: 14231
Joined: 2021
|
Re: Another earth shaking lie
May 21, 2025, 8:54 PM
|
|
That is why people had referenced his presidency as the Biden Handlers Administration.
xxxxxxxx
It is simply not credible that Biden, who arguably had the best healthcare in the entire world, had ‘suddenly’ been diagnosed with prostate cancer.
Back in 2019, Biden was allegedly diagnosed with an enlarged prostate. To suggest that he only received a checkup in his prostate via his annual physical (the last one being Feb. 2024) is a specious excuse.
By saying that Biden’s last full physical was in 2024 but not mentioning any ‘prostate-only’ checkups, the Biden health reports have deliberately implied that Biden’s prostate status was ignored between Feb.2024 and Q2-2025. This is specious because the statement indeed (might) be true, but the intentional omission of any intervening prostate-focused exams is the lie of omission.
I haven’t paid too much attention to the reports by the talking heads, so perhaps this point has already been discussed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2022]
TigerPulse: 97%
31
|
You seem very concerned with Bidens prostate.***
May 21, 2025, 9:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6915]
TigerPulse: 89%
41
Posts: 13763
Joined: 2008
|
Re: Another earth shaking lie
1
1
May 18, 2025, 5:28 PM
[ in reply to Re: Another earth shaking lie ] |
|
Did u read my post? It’s not about Biden, but about his handlers concealing it. With as many tests as he has had done, there’s little chance this was just discovered.
I have had 3 prostate MRIs and 3 biopsies myself so there’s a bit of knowledge behind the post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Champion [121406]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 77793
Joined: 2003
|
Re: Another earth shaking lie
1
May 18, 2025, 5:33 PM
|
|
Nobody concealed anything, he was just diagnosed. You read the first sentence of the OP, then failed to see 1851 was talking about his 2 year journey and assumed Biden's "handlers" had been concealing this for two years. You are pushing YOUR ill-informed narrative based on poor reading comprehension and your unquenchable instinct to jump out of the bushes and scream gotcha!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1155]
TigerPulse: 79%
26
|
Re: Another earth shaking lie
2
May 18, 2025, 5:33 PM
[ in reply to Re: Another earth shaking lie ] |
|
You're a f*cking moron. Yeah, I know you have what must be a half-assed doctorate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [15546]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 13448
Joined: 2013
|
Re: Another earth shaking lie
3
May 18, 2025, 5:40 PM
[ in reply to Re: Another earth shaking lie ] |
|
Agressive prostate cancer by its name is agressive.
Other tests like PSA sometimes takes a while to show at a dangerous level. It could have been missed or very well could have just formed recently.
I have stage 2 but non agressive. I was diagnosed two years ago come October and my doctors have told me I’d probably already had it a year or MORE before I had any symptoms. And my first PSA was not high. I’ve now had three biopsies and several mri’s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1471]
TigerPulse: 93%
29
|
Re: Another earth shaking lie
May 21, 2025, 9:01 PM
|
|
Agressive prostate cancer by its name is agressive.
Other tests like PSA sometimes takes a while to show at a dangerous level. It could have been missed or very well could have just formed recently.
I have stage 2 but non agressive. I was diagnosed two years ago come October and my doctors have told me I’d probably already had it a year or MORE before I had any symptoms. And my first PSA was not high. I’ve now had three biopsies and several mri’s.
Very sorry you have experienced that, biopsies are not fun and cancer is such a terrible thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [35110]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 39257
Joined: 2003
|
This is so telling...the former POTUS has aggressive cancer...
2
May 18, 2025, 7:40 PM
[ in reply to Another earth shaking lie ] |
|
and your post is about a cover-up. I read your other posts...you didn't read the article and you don't know what you're talking about in terms how that might present in an 82 year old. Like most if your other firm opinions, you base it on what you think you know mixed in with whatever might fit your political narrative and a bit of ole fashion BS.
Classless, foolish, d-bag is no way to go through life son.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16293]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
Facts
5
5
May 18, 2025, 7:47 PM
[ in reply to Another earth shaking lie ] |
|
At Biden’s age, PSA testing is not generally recommended. I don’t know if Biden was getting an annual PSA test or not as Presidents may well be treated differently than what is recommended for the general public.
A Gleason’s score of 9 is about as aggressive as prostate cancers get with a score of 10 being the worst.
Highly aggressive prostate cancers don’t always produce an elevated PSA as these cancers are so undifferentiated.
The digital rectal exam detected a nodule and the biopsy and subsequent bone scan revealed bone mets.
If one had to choose between a PSA test and a digital rectal exam, one would choose the PSA test, but again the nastiest prostate cancers don’t always produce an abnormal PSA result so I would recommend getting both tests to decrease the risk of missing an aggressive prostate cancer, but that unfortunately is not what is currently recommended by primary care physicians nor the American Urological Association.
Because of turning away from digital rectal exams and also PSA testing, more and more men are being diagnosed with more advanced prostate cancer which shouldn’t be a surprise.
Despite the Gleason score and bone mets, Biden with hormone therapy to eliminate testosterone probably will live several more years and some of the chemo for prostate cancer which is generally well tolerated may extend his life even further.
He has an incurable cancer for sure and an aggressive variant of cancer, but this still might not be what he dies from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [35110]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 39257
Joined: 2003
|
Wait...are you saying NC Tiger doesn't know what he's talking about?!?
2
May 18, 2025, 9:07 PM
|
|
shockedface.gif
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [15546]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 13448
Joined: 2013
|
Re: Facts
May 18, 2025, 9:27 PM
[ in reply to Facts ] |
|
“but this still might not be what he dies from.”
Exactly what my doctors have told me. I was only 50 when diagnosed but both opinions said I’ll die of something else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11627]
TigerPulse: 98%
46
Posts: 14231
Joined: 2021
|
Re: Facts
May 21, 2025, 9:07 PM
[ in reply to Facts ] |
|
This guidance to recommend against PSA testing for men over the age of ~65 / ~ 70 years is not based in medical best practice. Rather, it is based on the desire of the government to save the expense of paying for prostate testing.
I know numerous old men who have concierge medical coverage plans. Every one of them get the full prostate exam, including PSA testing for men, every year. If the numbers start elevating (still within the accepted range, but elevated when compared to previous exams), theynge5 a prostate sonogram and sometimes request the doc to arrange for biopsies of their prostate.
My cousin, whose dad had died of prostate cancer, got the biopsy even though his PSA numbers (albeit elevated vs prior years’ numbers) were within the acceptable range.
Turns out that his prostate had several ‘hot spots’ that were pre-metastatic prostate cancer. Of course, he had his prostate removed, and also received cancer treatments as an elevated form of prophylaxis.
Six years later, there is no sign of prostate cancer in the bones or other tissues.
(*). Concierge medical programs are very expensive. Biden, as well as all presidents, get care at least as comprehensive as wealthy private sector individuals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [40024]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 13187
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Facts
1
May 21, 2025, 9:50 PM
|
|
The fact that you’re educating the urologist regarding prostate screening best practice is just… peak P&R. Delicious. Well done.
You’re wrong btw, people age out of screening tests not because it’s some high cost, but rather because it becomes far more likely that you die of something else, and screening tests applied too broadly lead to unnecessary procedures and risk to patients.
I know this because it’s part of the pledge we all say together every morning to the Healthcare Cabal that hands down our orders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27233]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 18307
Joined: 2024
|
Re: Biden has been diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer
2
May 18, 2025, 5:06 PM
|
|
He definitely shouldn't have ran again. That's for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [35110]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 39257
Joined: 2003
|
On this, I think we can all agree!***
1
May 18, 2025, 9:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [65732]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 49273
Joined: 2000
|
Prayers for Joe Biden.
3
May 18, 2025, 6:55 PM
|
|
And prayers for you, 1851.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7767]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: Biden has been diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer
May 22, 2025, 2:13 AM
|
|
The plan was to cover up Bidens dementia and cancer long enough to get him reelected and then a few months later install Kamala as the first powerful black female POTUS. She would then be similarly controlled by the same shadowy cabal that was actually in charge of Bidens administration since she's a total moron who would be thrilled with such an arrangement. And the same media that lied about everything the last decade would be so busy jerking each other off about their strong female POTUS there would be zero coverage of any of these shenanigans just like we were told how sharp Biden was. Then the debate happened.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 23
| visibility 2056
|
|
|
50
