Replies: 37
| visibility 53
|
Top TigerNet [30421]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 35059
Joined: 2009
|
MikeGundy 1-9 vs OU
Dec 5, 2013, 2:50 PM
|
|
His rival. That's not good
|
|
|
 |
Orange Elite [5125]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Fire Gundy! ;-)***
Dec 5, 2013, 2:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [27842]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 48316
Joined: 2010
|
2-9 soon.***
Dec 5, 2013, 2:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [30593]
TigerPulse: 99%
55
Posts: 28685
Joined: 2005
|
Saturday is anyone's game... single digits at gametime....
Dec 5, 2013, 2:55 PM
|
|
wind chills below zero
|
|
|
|
 |
Standout [301]
TigerPulse: 100%
15
|
Difference is that OU should own them...***
Dec 5, 2013, 2:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117976]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
because they're the bigger state skewl?***
Dec 5, 2013, 3:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
Re: because they're the bigger state skewl?***
Dec 5, 2013, 3:04 PM
|
|
Because Ok has always been a bigger football power...
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117976]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
so nothing should ever change, osu should just give up?
Dec 5, 2013, 3:06 PM
|
|
that's bs.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
Re: so nothing should ever change, osu should just give up?
Dec 5, 2013, 3:16 PM
|
|
Who said OSU should give up? Point is OSU should be 1-9. Just like scujr should be 1-9
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117976]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
and that kind of thinking is a big part of the problem.***
Dec 5, 2013, 3:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
Re: and that kind of thinking is a big part of the problem.***
Dec 5, 2013, 3:41 PM
|
|
how is that a problem? Your kind of thinking is the problem...putting scujr up on a pedestal to make yourself feel better about 5
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117976]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
putting scar on a pedestal? if recognizing that a program
Dec 5, 2013, 3:59 PM
|
|
with 90 million in revenues can get better in the best college football conference in the land is putting them on a pedestal i'm guilty, but at least i'm not guilty of having my head in the sand.
thinking that can't happen or thinking they should never catch or pass their underspending rival situated in a less than attractive conference is ludicrous. that's the kind of thinking that gets people passed because they become complacent.
usc, tejas, osu, michigan, psu, miami, bama[add to the list if you'd like]... should never lose a game or change coaches unless of course their unfortunate enough to play each other, then they'll just weigh their wallets as a tie breaker?
everyone else should give up, there's no reason to play the games, it's all written in the sands of time.
maybe we can take up skiing or striper fishing; could weather really gets em fat? no reason to play the season, we'll just decide who history says should never lose or get better.
t boone could have saved some money. can't believe spurrier seeded a revenue campaign with his own $250k.
those guys are idiots.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
Re: putting scar on a pedestal? if recognizing that a program
Dec 5, 2013, 4:11 PM
|
|
didn't say it couldn't happen. We outrecruit them almost every year and have more talented players. They are not 0-5 better. They are not 2-6 better. They are not 6-7 better....
Yeah we have a losing record against the coots the last 13 years. Isn't that sad? The last 5 have a lot to do with that and it's unacceptable.
Message was edited by: CUAtTheFinishLine®
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117976]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
i agree they're not 0-5 better & you won't find anywhere i
Dec 5, 2013, 4:23 PM
|
|
suggested they were other than perhaps the most important place... on the sidelines & in the coach's box.
that's been a huge advantage for scar.
as far as talent, clemson's is skewed at the skill positions/in scheme and the talent difference isn't that great because of the schemes; scar has recruited well for their scheme. clemson's most recent big pulls have been wrs, rbs & 2 lbs, one of which can't buy the field.
scar plays the perfect scheme to disrupt what clemson tries to do.
they also have one smart mother effing coach behind the controller. he torments morris and dabo. he wins the game within the game.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
Then what are we arguing about?***
Dec 5, 2013, 4:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117976]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
Just like scujr should be 1-9
Dec 5, 2013, 4:27 PM
|
|
i didn't write it.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Just like scujr should be 1-9
Dec 5, 2013, 4:31 PM
|
|
and they should be. we should have won in 2006, 2009, 2012 and 2013. Ok so 2-8....
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117976]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
we got wrecked in 09 & i feel worse about this year than
Dec 5, 2013, 4:35 PM
|
|
last.
this year was an abomination.
i sorta could live with last year; scar's defense really jammed cu up after the first quarter.
clemson moved the ball very well this year.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
Re: we got wrecked in 09 & i feel worse about this year than
Dec 5, 2013, 4:38 PM
|
|
We won the Atlantic in 2009 with arguably the best player in the nation.
After harper fumble we were like a deer in headlights.
Scar beats us down and then goes and gets beat by Uconn in the dang pizza bowl...
We should have won that game if we had decent gameday and sideline coaches to kick us in gear.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117976]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
no matter where we got wrecked, we got wrecked.
Dec 5, 2013, 4:43 PM
|
|
they dominated every phase of the game except ko returns but even that was close.
it was woodshed time in lumbia.
uconn had a nice team that year, don't be hatin on their squad.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
Re: no matter where we got wrecked, we got wrecked.
Dec 5, 2013, 4:45 PM
|
|
they were 7-5 in the big east going into that game....
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117976]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
which has nothing to do with how they matched up against
Dec 5, 2013, 5:00 PM
|
|
scar. you seem to have a transitive issue or a way things should be in your mind issue. it was a good team for a couple years and following.
uconn was also coming in hot, they played well all year losing a number of good hardfought games.
edsall turned his success into a nice promo. i don't know if he turns umd around, but don't be hatin for the nice job he did at uconn.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
Re: which has nothing to do with how they matched up against
Dec 5, 2013, 5:01 PM
|
|
yeah, but you're saying we got wrecked by scujr deservingly and then say uconn was better than scujr. which begs the question, was uconn anywhere near as good as CU in your mind?
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117976]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
see, there you go again with your transitive horsepuckey...
Dec 5, 2013, 5:05 PM
|
|
where did i say uconn was better than clemson?
that's not how the game works; a month can make a difference in college football.
see scar to lsu last year.
#### happens.
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Day Hero [4128]
TigerPulse: 80%
36
|
You can't compare that to Clemson vs coots
Dec 5, 2013, 3:00 PM
|
|
For one, Oaklahoma has dominated OSU for as long as they have played each other. OSU is OU's little brother. Clemson has always dominated Carolina. ALWAYS! But not that has turned around and may not go back for years.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [30593]
TigerPulse: 99%
55
Posts: 28685
Joined: 2005
|
OSU has only won lke 16 games or so... ever***
Dec 5, 2013, 3:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117976]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
t boone can come support clemson if it's a problem.***
Dec 5, 2013, 3:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [30593]
TigerPulse: 99%
55
Posts: 28685
Joined: 2005
|
only if we can put wind turbines up.... but seriously..
Dec 5, 2013, 3:13 PM
|
|
I toured their locker room shen they were built a few years ago... and it's very, very impressive what they've done facilities wise
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117976]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
hell yeah, i've always admired the sooners, not liked,
Dec 5, 2013, 3:24 PM
|
|
admired, but for my dollar osu has some 'wow' to it now.
maybe i just like orange?
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [30421]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 35059
Joined: 2009
|
Yes but OSU has really upped their program
Dec 5, 2013, 3:05 PM
|
|
Recently.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117976]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
nope, we can't have that, ou has and should always remain
Dec 5, 2013, 3:07 PM
|
|
the dominant life form in oklahoma.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [101603]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 29899
Joined: 2005
|
|
|
|
 |
Walk-On [102]
TigerPulse: 31%
11
|
Re: MikeGundy 1-9 vs OU
Dec 5, 2013, 3:05 PM
|
|
Then we must keep Dabo for at least five more years.
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [79259]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 120524
Joined: 1998
|
Re: MikeGundy 1-9 vs OU
Dec 5, 2013, 3:19 PM
|
|
dont think he has beaten the coots either.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6777]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
But HE"S A MAN...and can take it!***
Dec 5, 2013, 3:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [30421]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 35059
Joined: 2009
|
You really can't go anywhere
Dec 5, 2013, 3:35 PM
|
|
If you think you "should" be 1-9 in 10 years vs your rival. Especially since the gap between the programs is negligible nowadays.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20819]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 18749
Joined: 2012
|
He's 40! A few years back at least***
Dec 5, 2013, 3:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [2018]
TigerPulse: 98%
31
|
we don' t have a qb and cant score
Dec 5, 2013, 4:30 PM
|
|
were gonna get curbstomped
|
|
|
|
Replies: 37
| visibility 53
|
|
|