Replies: 9
| visibility 1
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46646
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: ESPN FPI ranks Clemson No. 1 for second-straight preseason
Feb 14, 2019, 10:02 AM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14593]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 23665
Joined: 2004
|
Predicting everyone here will focus on the SEC having
Feb 14, 2019, 10:33 AM
|
|
half of the top 20 rather than Clemson being #1 and a full TD clear of #3 Georgia.
|
|
|
|
 |
Associate AD [1072]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
SC, Tenn, Miss St. This is Garbage***
Feb 14, 2019, 11:05 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [69791]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90831
Joined: 2001
|
It ain't how you drive, it's how you arrive...
Feb 14, 2019, 11:32 AM
|
|
and u of 5c will be lucky to arrive with a .500 record.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14593]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 23665
Joined: 2004
|
Don't lump Miss St in there. They've been legitimately good
Feb 14, 2019, 12:21 PM
[ in reply to SC, Tenn, Miss St. This is Garbage*** ] |
|
the last two years.
I'm not sure why but a lot of preseason "computer rankings" seem to like Tennessee a lot. It's not just FPI.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [69791]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90831
Joined: 2001
|
They're recruiting better and...
Feb 14, 2019, 12:45 PM
|
|
Pruitt has managed to hire some pretty solid assistant coaches.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14593]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 23665
Joined: 2004
|
I think it's just because they return nearly their
Feb 14, 2019, 1:36 PM
|
|
entire starting 22 from last year.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3247]
TigerPulse: 93%
34
|
Re: TNET: ESPN FPI ranks Clemson No. 1 for second-straight preseason
Feb 14, 2019, 3:32 PM
|
|
Again...with Michigan...W+F?!?!?!
Tell me why anyone at this point would expect Michigan to do anything significant under Harbaugh???
Goodness, don't these people EVER learn???
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Spirit [9405]
TigerPulse: 99%
44
|
Re: TNET: ESPN FPI ranks Clemson No. 1 for second-straight preseason
Feb 14, 2019, 6:11 PM
|
|
This is total BS ......10 teams from SEC is not even close to being accurate........why did they not include the other 4 SEC teams as well.......what a frigging joke ESPN has become.......guess they did not ask Paul Finebum for his expertise on this one......Go Tigers!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [19006]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
That metric is about as useful as a velvet painting of a whale & dolphin getting it on
Feb 14, 2019, 11:33 PM
|
|
Syracuse 50, Boston College lower than that?! The SEC is exclusively in the top 5, and 5 of the top 10?! Ludicrous! Sacrilege! Steven A Smith spews more intelligence than that. Barely, but does. LSU?! I mean, come on man! Ogeron is about as legit a head coach as Pawl Johnson was at Tech. Once the former recruits run out, so will the competitive nature of LSU. Just like at Tech with Pawl. 4 star guys running the triple option was almost unstoppable. Once his recruits got in there, it became much easier. Because he couldn’t recruit blue chip players. Anyway, no respect to Texas. They are on the doorstep of being back. They aren’t back. But, are standing outside looking in. SC ranked as high as they are is hilarious. The entire SEC is hot garbage sans Bammer & ummmm, maybe Georgia. Maybe. I mean, ESPN had Bama blowing us out of the water in the Natty last year. I knew if we could weather their initial storm in the first quarter, that we were going to pull away 2nd half. And, we did. Only Corso & Herbstreit knew what was up. I see Clemson, Notre Dame, Oklahoma with Hurts at QB, Alabama, and that’s it for now as contenders. No one else is even sniffing a bus yet. Next tier is Georgia, Michigan, Ohio St, Wash St, Washington, Penn St, and Texas. Giving any other teams any recognition last here is ridiculous. The top 4 are all that matter. The SEC sucks. Syracuse could beat most of the teams not named Bama. They’d even give Bama a fit! 50th my big ol butt! #GoTigers #AllIn
|
|
|
|
Replies: 9
| visibility 1
|
|
|