Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Portal not the problem against Louisville.
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Replies: 29
| visibility 3715

Portal not the problem against Louisville.

14

Nov 4, 2024, 12:01 PM

If you look at the 44 starters on offense and defense for both teams Clemson has more talent based off of the recruiting rankings. Clemson was simply out coached by the Louisville staff. Both of Clemson's coordinators could not make adjustments to help the team. You can make the portal argument for the GA game but not the Louisville game.

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Portal not the problem against Louisville.

13

Nov 4, 2024, 12:01 PM

Being soft as charmin is the problem

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Portal not the problem against Louisville.

3

Nov 4, 2024, 12:16 PM

Mjc3194® said:

Being soft as charmin is the problem


POST of the DAY!!!!!!! I’ve been saying it for a few years. This Team and Coaches are SOFT!!!!!!! Very little Physicality!!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Portal not the problem against Louisville.

1

Nov 4, 2024, 2:44 PM [ in reply to Re: Portal not the problem against Louisville. ]

SOFT is right. Nick Eason for defensive coordinator. It's time for "grown man" defensive football at Clemson.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Portal not the problem against Louisville.

1
1

Nov 4, 2024, 2:48 PM [ in reply to Re: Portal not the problem against Louisville. ]

The real reason the SEC and Big 10 ARE THE TWO BEST CONFERENCES IN COLLEGE FOOTBALL IS ONE REASON:
they are more physical than everyone else. Period.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Portal not the problem against Louisville.

6

Nov 4, 2024, 12:01 PM

I don’t even think we had an offensive gameplan. If so, what was it?

2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Portal not the problem against Louisville.

3

Nov 4, 2024, 1:00 PM

The offensive game, or lack thereof, was a big problem.

Cade must have looked terrible in practice last week, because we seemed determined to run the ball and eat up clock, even when behind by 19 points. The coaches evidently didn't trust him to throw downfield but repeated asked him to throw 30 yard passes to the sidelines that would result in a 4 yard gain if successful.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Portal not the problem against Louisville.

3

Nov 4, 2024, 1:03 PM

It's frustrating when People don't actually discuss the source of the problem. The reason the coaches were throwing all those short passes and running the ball was not because they didn't trust Klubnik. It's because the offensive line was blocking long enough for their routes to develop.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Portal not the problem against Louisville.

2
2

Nov 4, 2024, 12:05 PM

Outcoached is right. Dabo is out of steam.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

FG kicking not getting fixed is 100% on coaches.***

2

Nov 4, 2024, 12:16 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FG kicking not getting fixed is 100% on coaches.***

2

Nov 4, 2024, 12:50 PM

Blocking on FG kicks

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FG kicking not getting fixed is 100% on coaches.***

2

Nov 4, 2024, 1:29 PM

Do we have a special teams coach specifically or is it someone's secondary responsibility?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FG kicking not getting fixed is 100% on coaches.***

2

Nov 4, 2024, 1:38 PM

Mike Reed’s side gig.

https://clemsontigers.com/coaches/mike-reed/

2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FG kicking not getting fixed is 100% on coaches.***

2

Nov 4, 2024, 2:02 PM [ in reply to Re: FG kicking not getting fixed is 100% on coaches.*** ]

Florida St. And Louisville are ranked #1 in the nation in kicks blocked thanks to us. Clemson is ranked last in the country in allowing blocked kicks. This cannot be blamed on the snapper, the holder, or the kicker. 100% on the left side of the line. We've had the person playing TE get knocked on his butt four times. The person playing wing did not touch his man on the last block. This is not best is the standard. This is worst is the standard.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Portal not the problem against Louisville.

4

Nov 4, 2024, 12:18 PM

It wasn't the problem against Louisville, but it is a problem for the program in general...

2025 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Portal not the problem against Louisville.

2

Nov 4, 2024, 1:04 PM

Not really ..... NIL combined with it causes a lot of problems, but neither is why we lost this game or why we have slipped in recent years.

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Louisville Saw Opportunity...And Just Wanted It More***

3

Nov 4, 2024, 12:18 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Louisville Saw Opportunity...And Just Wanted It More***

2

Nov 4, 2024, 12:51 PM

Jeff Brohm is good coach as well

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Louisville Saw Opportunity...And Just Wanted It More***

2

Nov 4, 2024, 1:02 PM

True ....excellent coach!

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Louisville Saw Opportunity...And Just Wanted It More***

1
1

Nov 4, 2024, 2:51 PM [ in reply to Re: Louisville Saw Opportunity...And Just Wanted It More*** ]

Players respond to the mentality of the Head Coach. If he is soft, they"ll be soft. If he's a raging bull, they'll respond to that too.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Portal not the problem against Louisville.

2

Nov 4, 2024, 12:44 PM

100%. It wasn’t a talent problem that lost us this game.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Not sure I follow your logic

2

Nov 4, 2024, 12:51 PM

HOWEVER: Anyone with eyes could see man-for-man, our players got kicked in the teeth by their players.
Whose fault is that?

badge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

..:: ru4god2 ::..


Re: Not sure I follow your logic

2

Nov 4, 2024, 2:07 PM

There is a lot of blame to go around everywhere but it's not just the portal.

Everyone is talking up Pate's comments, and I think there is merit in much of them.

However, he claims we had a "roster advantage" and that we "got dog-walked by a team we have no business getting dog-walked by" (suggesting we have far more talent). I agree with both of those points, and bet everyone here does as well.

At the same time he says THIS SAME game permanently drops this program because Dabo hasn't adjusted/started using the portal. Yet he indicates in the same argument that not using the portal has resulted in us having a higher talent level than the team that beat us down.

That doesn't compute.

Something is very wrong, for sure. But resist the temptation to jump on the big, lazy narrative. Dabo may be the problem but his not using the portal didn't lose this game. This defense was supposed to be stout. In my mind, we lost that game first and foremost because we couldn't stop the run-big play after big play.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

never has been

1

Nov 4, 2024, 12:59 PM

but i also blame new things for anything that goes wrong be abuse i'm basic intenctually

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It is when the opposing QB is in yr 7, and has been to 3 colleges

1

Nov 4, 2024, 1:34 PM

And then he flips into the endzone. Woah....

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

portal/NIL is definitely a large part of the problem.........

2

Nov 4, 2024, 1:38 PM

the case for the portal is actually EASIER in games like Louisville OR Duke OR Miami OR NCstate OR South Carolina


teams that we typically out talent drastically have utilized the portal to close the so-called "talent gap". Not to mention the recruits we lose or don't get interest from b/c we're not willing to open the pocket book for "HS talent" (ie dip in recruiting).............not to mention the 10-12 players we lose each year to the portal and only backfill them w/ young HS talent (mostly less talented than what left), that causes depth and Talent issues.


It's most definitely and has been a LARGE part of the problem............but you continue to believe the crap that Dabo feeds you.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yep Pheebo.....

1

Nov 4, 2024, 3:01 PM

If you aint gonna use the portal, you better be elite at HS recruiting. We do neither. I say do both....why limit yourself and make your margin for error non-existent.

2025 white level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

when Woods went out, we couldn't stop the run - we're missing depth

2

Nov 4, 2024, 2:07 PM

on the DL. Especially at DE. Doesn't the portal help with depth?

2025 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Portal not the problem against Louisville.

1

Nov 4, 2024, 2:30 PM

We are soft on defense need new blood and a new S&C coach too many injured players and players getting tired and giving up

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Portal not the problem against Louisville.

2

Nov 4, 2024, 2:33 PM

We went from the best DC in the country, probably of the decade - to a guy who is barely qualified to coach D3.
Thats a Big problem.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 29
| visibility 3715
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic