|
Replies: 19
| visibility 4
|
Dynasty Maker [3563]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Let's review CU & SC picks from last year Kornblut picks
Jul 18, 2015, 7:26 PM
|
|
BDGamecock
08-27-2014, 03:40 PM
Phil says that Clemson is weak in the OL and RB, but looks good on Def. , the front 7 for sure and really good WR's. Picks a 9-3 season with a loss to Ga., Fla. St and Carolina. He said look out for Clemson in 2015 and a NC run in 2016.
He is very high on Carolina..... Gamecocks will be strong on the OL and RB's. and good WR's. Def. will play as a team this year and will be as good or better than last year. Picks Carolina to go 11-1 with a loss to Auburn and will win the east. He thinks the Fla. game will be for the east and he thinks Fla. might be the sleeper this year in the SEC. He thinks Dylan will hit a lot of deep passes this year because of a strong arm and a great running game.
I know anything can happen during the season , but I will love 11 wins for sure .....
How'd he do folks?
http://palmettostaterivals.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-48758.html
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [39613]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 33604
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Let's review CU & SC picks from last year Kornblut picks
Jul 18, 2015, 7:32 PM
|
|
He pretty much nailed us , swap the GT loss for his biased whiff on the Gamecoot outcome and he did well enough . I think our OL/RB situation was a bit better than he predicted, and that beared out .
His garnet glasses distorted the Coots roster and talent capabilities , and he just looked dumb with that prediction of east champs and going 11-1 .
Dude likes him some Dirtpecker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59900]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 45261
Joined: 2003
|
I think what I said on this board in July of 2014 was much,
Jul 18, 2015, 10:11 PM
|
|
much closer to what happened. If I could find it easily, I would link it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4349]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Pretty spot on
Jul 18, 2015, 11:11 PM
|
|
Signed,
The four leafed leprechaun riding a unicorn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [127]
TigerPulse: 24%
11
|
Yea ole spritz likes the revisionist prediction ??. That's
Jul 19, 2015, 10:15 AM
|
|
his "specialty"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [127]
TigerPulse: 24%
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59900]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 45261
Joined: 2003
|
Took me 30 minutes to find this. That is all the time I'm
Jul 19, 2015, 1:54 PM
|
|
going to waste on it.....
Spud
Ignore Spud
Follow Spud
All-TigerNet [14447]
TigerPulse: 100%
Pulse Rate
Posts: 25113
Followers: 7
Joined: 11/17/03
I stated back in June, that the Coot defense, based on the [2]
Posted: Oct 6, 2014 9:26 AM
last three years trend, would be ranked in the 50's or worse this year. They went from 4th at 261.00 a game, to 10th at 311.00 a game,to 20th at 341.00 a game. I predicted they would go to 400.00 yards a game this year and if they had to defend another 6-8 plays a game(last year they only defended about 65 a game) that they could be worse. They are currently at 441.00 a game and 90th in the country. I also said they lost ALL of their pass rush which wasn't that great last year. They are currently 115th in sacks( totaling 6 for the whole team) and 122 in Tackles for Loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [127]
TigerPulse: 24%
11
|
I didn't say tell us that you thought they'd fall from #4
Jul 19, 2015, 2:25 PM
|
|
final ranking previous year. ####, ain't got much room to move up. I said tell us where you predicted that the coots would be my beloved Tigers - cause they did. If you didn't prefict it, you were wrong. Any orange colored glasses wearing Clemson fan will say that the coots suck and will never win another game. A true educated football fan can see their own team losing at times.
#armchairprognosticatorssuck
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5922]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: I didn't say tell us that you thought they'd fall from #4
Jul 19, 2015, 5:25 PM
|
|
usc will be better on defense and worse on offense in 2015. You'll be 7-5 or 8-4 depending on the UNC game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59900]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 45261
Joined: 2003
|
If they lose the UNC game they will be 5-7.***
Jul 20, 2015, 9:13 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1422]
TigerPulse: 98%
29
|
Please tell me
Jul 19, 2015, 3:05 AM
|
|
you aren't a poster on that coot site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59900]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 45261
Joined: 2003
|
I never post on FGF, but I will admit I occassionally read
Jul 19, 2015, 1:55 PM
|
|
it for entertainment purposes only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [127]
TigerPulse: 24%
11
|
That's funny ole spritz, cause you sure do pump
Jul 19, 2015, 3:20 PM
|
|
em on tnet, and the programming updates on the sec network are driving ratings.
#nothelpingthebottomline
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5249]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
He tells us what on SEC network
Jul 19, 2015, 3:34 PM
|
|
So no one else needs to check
#HashtagsOnTnetAreStupid
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [127]
TigerPulse: 24%
11
|
Every time he pumps the programming, I'm intrigued and
Jul 19, 2015, 3:49 PM
|
|
check it out (as do others), which brings the sec mo $$.
#youaremissingthepoint
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59900]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 45261
Joined: 2003
|
Was pumping SEC channel. Was pumping Coot losses on SEC
Jul 19, 2015, 4:35 PM
|
|
Channel. Tigers know easily recognized that. And appreciated it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [15557]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 13458
Joined: 2013
|
Re: Was pumping SEC channel. Was pumping Coot losses on SEC
Jul 19, 2015, 4:40 PM
|
|
I remember your predictions Spud, a long with two or three other posters that pretty much nailed it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59900]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 45261
Joined: 2003
|
Thank you. My coot running buddy does too, but he cannot
Jul 19, 2015, 5:03 PM
|
|
bring himself to admit it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1422]
TigerPulse: 98%
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [127]
TigerPulse: 24%
11
|
Let's hope spritz doesn't give Kornhole the same pub
Jul 20, 2015, 9:43 AM
|
|
he gives the secn
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 19
| visibility 4
|
|
|
50
