Replies: 9
| visibility 1850
|
Clemson Icon [24101]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 20322
Joined: 2011
|
Odd Coot question
Jun 19, 2016, 11:05 AM
|
|
Quote from Cocky talk
This team will be better coached, but has less established talent than last year. No one could pick them in the top 4, we have several position groups that are completely unproven. They could be good and there could also be a steep learning curve. http://www.cockytalk.com/showthread.php?t=224880
This gives myself the confuse. How can a team be better coached when everyone, I mean everyone,on their staff did less with more talented players at their previous schools? Can you coach 2 & 3 stars better than you could 4 and 5 stars ?
|
|
|
 |
110%er [3926]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
the answer, in their minds, after they go round and round, after they pray,
Jun 19, 2016, 11:16 AM
|
|
after they climb the highest mountains seeking consult from the true coot who actually did get his GED.
The answer......"wait til next year"
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Day Hero [4376]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
better coached? w/o the greatest visored coach in
Jun 19, 2016, 11:27 AM
|
|
the history of the world ? I say cockytalk !
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [43200]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43602
Joined: 1998
|
Spurrier was a bad coach at UF, Muschamp was a winner
Jun 19, 2016, 11:38 AM
|
|
logic
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14625]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 23694
Joined: 2004
|
It's amazing what they can convince themselves of.
Jun 19, 2016, 11:50 AM
|
|
As much as i hate Spurrier, he was a HOF caliber coach. Muschamps couldn't win with 5 star talent at Florida. He has a pretty good track record as a DC, but he was a disaster as a HC and his teams could barely complete a forward pass. And now he's suddenly a better coach than Spurrier?
The coots just need to wake up and face the facts. They got rejected by a few hotties, settled for the ugly fat chick, and now they are desperately trying to convince themselves that she's anything other than what she really is.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [10402]
TigerPulse: 95%
45
Posts: 17413
Joined: 2010
|
Re: Odd Coot question
Jun 19, 2016, 11:54 AM
|
|
Boom will be fired in 4 years with less than 20 wins
|
|
|
|
 |
Rock Defender [50]
TigerPulse: 71%
6
|
Re: Odd Coot question
Jun 19, 2016, 11:58 AM
|
|
I say 3 , with only 17 wins total .
|
|
|
|
 |
Valley Legend [12907]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 10482
Joined: 2006
|
I haven't checked back, but I don't recall Muscoot's D's
Jun 19, 2016, 12:35 PM
|
|
being particularly good at Texas, other than having some excellent defensive players. At Florida, he was already stocked with some outstanding defensive players and were good. Anyone have any statistics on any of his Longhorn D's?
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Elite [5490]
TigerPulse: 44%
38
Posts: 17846
Joined: 2005
|
Re: I haven't checked back, but I don't recall Muscoot's D's
Jun 19, 2016, 12:43 PM
|
|
They were #3 in total defense 2009 and #6 in 2010
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1806]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
I think it would be fair to say that Muschamp and Co. would
Jun 19, 2016, 12:49 PM
|
|
be better coaches than Elliot and the interim staff. Also, you could argue they could be a better coaching staff than the Spurrier staff in this last season alone. Ole Steve had kind of given up on this season. You could tell he didn't care much about coaching any longer. That is why he said that he only wanted to coach for another couple of years.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 9
| visibility 1850
|
|
|