|
Replies: 19
| visibility 3
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [102539]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 26398
Joined: 2006
|
Mike Farrell on coot recruiting:
Feb 2, 2016, 1:54 PM
|
|
“That was a horrible football team at South Carolina that we saw this year. Recruiting’s been down for the last three years,” Farrell said. “The roster is not loaded with talent whatsoever, and they are probably sixth or seventh choice in the southeast right now, if that.”
lol
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [105932]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 44238
Joined: 2008
|
In the southeast or southeastern conference?
Feb 2, 2016, 1:59 PM
|
|
There's no way they're the 6th or 7th best choice in the southeast.
Clemson
Alabama
Florida
Florida State
Auburn
Georgia
Tennessee
LSU
Ole Miss
UNC
Miami
Mississippi State
App State
Citadel
Then MAYBE USuCk
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
Re: In the southeast or southeastern conference?
Feb 2, 2016, 2:03 PM
|
|
Duke and GT should be higher right now and nc state is close
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [105932]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 44238
Joined: 2008
|
I'll give you Duke
Feb 2, 2016, 2:04 PM
|
|
GT might be pushing it though. You're right NCSU is close, but still behind the coots
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [43178]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43585
Joined: 1998
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [80223]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 44312
Joined: 2004
|
that's how I took it. seriously.***
Feb 2, 2016, 2:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2332]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: 6th choice in the SEC east***
Feb 2, 2016, 3:11 PM
[ in reply to 6th choice in the SEC east*** ] |
|
They will be considered seventh in the east if they lose their opening game to Vandy, Muscrap is starting on a "high" note based upon their stupid fan comments.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [102539]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 26398
Joined: 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69877]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90866
Joined: 2001
|
I wouldn't go so far as to say there is no talent....
Feb 2, 2016, 2:26 PM
|
|
but the roster certainly isn't loaded with talent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14618]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 23689
Joined: 2004
|
I was actually thinking about this earlier today when i read
Feb 2, 2016, 3:26 PM
[ in reply to In the southeast or southeastern conference? ] |
|
the article in the P&C. I decided that SEC schools A&M, LSU, Arkansas, and Mizzou are NOT part of the southeast. I'm sure Louisiana is debatable, but I consider the southeast to end at Mississippi and Tennessee.
I still think there are 8 that aren't even questionable.
Clemson
Georgia
Florida
FSU
Tenn
Alabama
Auburn
Ole Miss
Then you have UNC and Miami which are currently recruiting quite a bit better than SC. Miss St is another school that's pretty much on par with SC at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2135]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: I was actually thinking about this earlier today when i read
Feb 2, 2016, 3:33 PM
|
|
You forgot The Citadel
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12506]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 10500
Joined: 2011
|
And we're back to normal
Feb 2, 2016, 2:00 PM
|
|
I thought Coach Boom was a recruiting guru. LOLOLOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24098]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 20318
Joined: 2011
|
Man is a prophet LOL
Feb 2, 2016, 2:07 PM
|
|
Farrell 3:16 USuC is a bottom feeder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69877]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90866
Joined: 2001
|
Sixth or seventh choice in the southeast right now ?!?!?!
Feb 2, 2016, 2:12 PM
|
|
talk about wishful thinking.
Tennessee, UNC, Florida, Florida State, Georgia, Miami, Auburn, Virginia Tech, Alabama, Ole Miss, LSU, and Clemson, just to name a few, are all better programs than $CU right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: Sixth or seventh choice in the southeast right now ?!?!?!
Feb 2, 2016, 3:11 PM
|
|
You guys sure spend a lot of time crapping on a program so low on the totem pole.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69877]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90866
Joined: 2001
|
Misery loves company***
Feb 2, 2016, 3:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [211]
TigerPulse: 51%
13
|
Re: Mike Farrell on coot recruiting:
Feb 2, 2016, 2:32 PM
|
|
How could F say 6th or 7th, really?
Alabama
Auburn
Georgia
Florida
Tennessee
LSU
Ole Miss
Arkansas
TX A&M
Miss State
How about the bottom four (Kentucky, Missouri, Vandy and USCjr)!
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [8040]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
How did usc fall so far so fast?***
Feb 2, 2016, 2:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1045]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
The better question is how did they rise so quick?
Feb 2, 2016, 3:12 PM
|
|
They have stunk for the majority of their existence. That is not baffling. The irregularity was the 5 years of success they managed to string together.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [80]
TigerPulse: 100%
9
|
Re: How did usc fall so far so fast?***
Feb 2, 2016, 3:17 PM
[ in reply to How did usc fall so far so fast?*** ] |
|
Fell so fast because they weren't built on a solid foundation. Much like the rest of their university, it is more about today than anything. You can see it throughout their system - athletics, academics, even the facilities. No consistency, little tradition and all about the instant "flash".
Some examples:
Football Coaching Hires - Wanted the name, not a program builder. They got what they paid for in Holtz and Spurrier. Spurrier had no intentions of leaving the program better than he found it as the next guy would have improved on it an overshadowed his giant ego.
Baseball Program - Already losing luster
Baseball Stadium - Nice but located in a bad area. So close to the river, but no access or view. Shortcuts taken and they've had to deal with stuctural issues, settling and other things since construction.
Colonial Center - Big square footage but cheaply constructed and more about size than quality. Doesn't have a good feel and is generally much less than capacity.
There are too many other examples to list. Living in the area I see it often.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 19
| visibility 3
|
|
|
50
