|
Replies: 25
| visibility 1
|
Varsity [224]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 385
Joined: 10/5/10
|
Clowney was arguably one of the best DE in the land........
Dec 15, 2012, 4:04 PM
|
|
and Clemson established a running game against them. LSU obviously has a balanced, ferocious D line but I think Clemson can expose them better than USC. It's been more of a mental thing for Clemson and USC in my opinion. This is a neutral location with a chance for Clemson to really get some redemption. They will either man up, or just dress up. Let's hope they man up. Clemson is extremely capable of running up on LSU quick.......Zack isn't exactly the comeback king. It's really about who wants it more, or if it's just a "lets get it over with type of thing"......if they show up the way they did against Vtech last year in the ACCCG after the whipping in Columbia we will be in good shape!!!! LSU is only favored by 4
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 14500
Joined: 1/2/11
|
Clowney is on another level from everyone else
Dec 15, 2012, 4:05 PM
|
|
He single handily beat Clemson, take him away and Clemson blows out SC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [224]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 385
Joined: 10/5/10
|
Re: Clowney is on another level from everyone else
Dec 15, 2012, 4:14 PM
|
|
that's my point.....LSU is balanced on D, but they don't have a Clowney from end to end......
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [42]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 65
Joined: 10/18/02
|
Re: Clowney is on another level from everyone else
Dec 15, 2012, 4:18 PM
[ in reply to Clowney is on another level from everyone else ] |
|
BryantTiger...I totally agree. Clowney by himself be us. He was in Boyd's head from the start. Why we didn't double and triple team him from the start baffles me. We should have neautralized him much the other teams di to us with Sammy. I hate to lose to the coots.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [111292]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 73650
Joined: 9/10/03
|
Re: Clowney is on another level from everyone else
Dec 15, 2012, 4:25 PM
|
|
agree, the entire offense got rattled and never hit its stride.
It is a shame would could not secure Clowney. It also sucks that we had to settle for Timothy over Brandon Shell at Tackle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [51524]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43075
Joined: 8/10/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [224]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 385
Joined: 10/5/10
|
Re: What about on 3rd and 18 we dropped 8...
Dec 15, 2012, 4:37 PM
|
|
why are you here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [51524]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43075
Joined: 8/10/04
|
Yep we did have a running game. And Chad Morris
Dec 15, 2012, 4:28 PM
|
|
was a moron and abandoned it. What was he thinking? Too busy on monster.com?
Yeah I called him a moron. He and his pisspoor play calling lost that game for us. #### him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [224]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 385
Joined: 10/5/10
|
Re: Yep we did have a running game. And Chad Morris
Dec 15, 2012, 4:37 PM
|
|
dude.......go away
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3389]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3043
Joined: 10/22/07
|
DE.
Dec 15, 2012, 4:41 PM
|
|
Nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [224]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 385
Joined: 10/5/10
|
Re: DE.
Dec 15, 2012, 5:10 PM
|
|
yeah, I meant Defensive End....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [224]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 385
Joined: 10/5/10
|
Re: DE.
Dec 15, 2012, 5:11 PM
[ in reply to DE. ] |
|
plays like a both.......and DE and LB do switch on and off the line sometimes.....anyways, good looking out
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [554]
TigerPulse: 40%
Posts: 1874
Joined: 10/29/00
|
Re: Clowney was arguably one of the best LB in the land.....
Dec 15, 2012, 4:58 PM
|
|
they do not have a clowney but what they do have is very good. clowney is our only defensive player that would start for them. their defense is the real deal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [224]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 385
Joined: 10/5/10
|
Re: Clowney was arguably one of the best LB in the land.....
Dec 15, 2012, 5:16 PM
|
|
I agree, but I don't think Clemson is mentally blocked by them like Clowney. They may have a solid D but they aren't all Clowneys....
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [554]
TigerPulse: 40%
Posts: 1874
Joined: 10/29/00
|
Re: Clowney was arguably one of the best LB in the land.....
Dec 15, 2012, 5:40 PM
|
|
i think you are absolutely right about the mental part. i think y'alls guys are under a ton of pressure to beat us and i think they will play looser against lsu. will still be tough to score though. the good thing is i think yalls defense can contain them if yall play well. i dont think its a horrible matchup for clemson. i do think you will need some big plays to get some points because that defense wont give up alot of sustained drives. luckily for yall, you have some big play guys. could see it going either way. intriguing matchup that i will definitely watch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5265]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5440
Joined: 9/11/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [30]
TigerPulse: 20%
Posts: 97
Joined: 12/7/10
|
Re: Clowney was arguably one of the best LB in the land.....
Dec 15, 2012, 5:34 PM
|
|
Wow, the guy makes a reasonable comment & you're butthurt over it...mad much?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5265]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5440
Joined: 9/11/04
|
No...not butt hurt
Dec 15, 2012, 5:36 PM
|
|
Just telling him to get back to work. Same for you coot...get back to pumping that gas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [30]
TigerPulse: 20%
Posts: 97
Joined: 12/7/10
|
Re: No...not butt hurt
Dec 15, 2012, 5:41 PM
|
|
Uhh actually I'm a custodian & mall security guard...suck on that
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5265]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5440
Joined: 9/11/04
|
Lol even better
Dec 15, 2012, 5:48 PM
|
|
Point for you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [224]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 385
Joined: 10/5/10
|
Re: No...not butt hurt
Dec 15, 2012, 5:43 PM
[ in reply to No...not butt hurt ] |
|
okay, so back to the LSU game.........so it's pretty much an LSU over Clemson margin or percentage by standards from what I've read...........Either Clemson plays an "A" game flawless and has a shot, or it's a low scoring game and LSU comes out on top with a few highlighted Clemson TDs that will give us a ray of hope. Clemson is so fast they should be able to break outside, but that's just what I think. I'm going with Clemson upsetting LSU in the Peach and claiming dominance to Death Valley! GO CLEMSON TIGERS!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [554]
TigerPulse: 40%
Posts: 1874
Joined: 10/29/00
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5265]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5440
Joined: 9/11/04
|
Lol awesome
Dec 15, 2012, 5:49 PM
|
|
Good sport
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [217]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 200
Joined: 11/24/12
|
Lsu d
Dec 15, 2012, 5:41 PM
|
|
I agree that we can score points on Lsu defense, but we'll need a balanced attack. I hope we start by getting the ball to our play makers before giving them a chance to rattle Tajh. Also disappointed we missed on Sam Montgomery. We "need" to get a stud DE back on the roster. Come on down Carl Lawson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1482]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 2011
Joined: 3/4/11
|
Re: Clowney was arguably one of the best DE in the land........
Dec 15, 2012, 5:46 PM
|
|
Good lord. A coot can't even agree with us to give props to one of their own.
Alrighty then- y'all suck balls through n' through.
Doo Doo is one hell of a player, but we'll just say he's mediocre so our house coots feel happy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [361]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 1394
Joined: 6/7/06
|
Let's say we play lights out on offense,lsu will still get
Dec 15, 2012, 5:51 PM
|
|
Thieir share of 3 and outs. The first concern is still whether or not we can do the same. This is why we struggle against tough defenses. If we can't get off the field, our offense vs their d will not matter. I do think we will put forth a better gameplay and have more success against their d than our last game(hopefully we learned that we cannot play on offense trying to compensate for our weaknesses on d) that sure seemed to be the mindset going in against the coots. My main concern is that they can impose their will against our d with even more success. If we have to win in a shoot out, I would,much rather see a d gameplan that is more aggressive instead of a bend but don't break approach, otherwise we will get wore down with long drives and have trouble getting into a rhythm when we have the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 25
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
