Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement
General Boards - Politics
add New Topic
Topics: Previous | Next
Replies: 47
| visibility 3215

To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement

1

Jun 22, 2025, 9:04 AM
Reply

Now we face the potential of all out war with a woefully inept commander in chief, the least qualified secretary of Defense in our nation's history, a homeland security secretary who's only contribution is photo ops, a disjointed disrupted department of defense that cares more about squashing diversity and renaming bases than actually defending a nation, and congress that is merely a collection of social media influencers. What a pickle we're in. MAGA idiots, when folks said donny was an existential threat to democracy this is what they meant.

2025 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement

3

Jun 22, 2025, 9:09 AM
Reply



tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You're not smart; that gif is neither witty nor apropos***

1

Jun 22, 2025, 9:13 AM
Reply



2025 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: You're not smart; that gif is neither witty nor apropos***

2

Jun 22, 2025, 9:14 AM
Reply

have you decided which team you will support in this one

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

More idiocy

4

Jun 22, 2025, 9:18 AM
Reply

Opposition to Donny is an act of patriotism. This great nation deserves much more than it's getting from its leaders. You're a pathetic rube that believes the lie that Trump IS America and to oppose him is treason. Just another brainwashed MAGA.

2025 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: More idiocy

1

Jun 22, 2025, 9:22 AM
Reply

so no decision yet

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: More idiocy

1

Jun 22, 2025, 3:33 PM
Reply

Sounds like he's clearly on the side of the Iranians like most of the left wing trash. TDS overrides love of country.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

They all have. They want Iran to have nuclear weapons.

1

Jun 22, 2025, 11:29 AM [ in reply to Re: You're not smart; that gif is neither witty nor apropos*** ]
Reply

Couldn't be more clear.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If she's a hollerer, she'll be a screamer.
If she's a screamer, she'll get you arrested.


You are a perfect example of why an IQ test should be part of voter registration***

1

Jun 22, 2025, 12:22 PM
Reply



2025 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: You are a perfect example of why an IQ test should be part of voter registration***


Jun 22, 2025, 9:02 PM
Reply

So says the crazy who views Trump as the lesser of two ‘evils’ when compared to the world’s most prominent state sponsor of terror.

Tip: Iran is looking for English speakers to join them in their Jihaad against America. Now, you be you.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


What funny is how you seem to view yourself as some erudite transcendent


Jun 23, 2025, 12:48 PM
Reply

Thinker who sees things more deeply than the rest of us and feels compelled to educate us unwashed masses until we reach your enlightened state.

You're fooling yourself, but no one else. Most of what you post is nonsensical drivel or conspiracy theory lunacy.

I don't compare the POTUS to the leader of Iran because, unlike MAGA cultists, I know the difference between an opponent and an enemy. Putin, Xi, Khamenei are our enemies; AOC, Schiff, MTG, Gaetz are opponents. That's why you idiots view anyone who speaks out against donny as anti-American you put politics above patriotism and think others do as well.

RememberTheDanny

2025 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement


Jun 22, 2025, 10:03 AM [ in reply to Re: To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement ]
Reply

Old Bob was must see tv!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

A more mature, reserved report of the operation with limited information

2

Jun 22, 2025, 9:24 AM
Reply

…. would have been more appropriate. Also acknowledgement of the vigilance regarding an Iranian asymmetric response over the next several years needs to emphasized. The ongoing danger and risks for an extended period of time should not be overlooked.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: A mature, reasoned opinion from Tropical


Jun 22, 2025, 9:04 PM
Reply

Dear Tropical

I always knew you had it in you!

RTD

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement

2

Jun 22, 2025, 9:30 AM
Reply

could not inform any democrat prior to the strike is very telling

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The precedents set by this Admin likely become SOP for future presidents


Jun 22, 2025, 9:43 AM
Reply

The over-extensions of executive power may diminish the balance of power between the branches of government. The overreach one side embraces now may lay the foundation for how the other side governs in the future.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The precedents set by this Admin likely become SOP for future presidents


Jun 22, 2025, 9:14 PM
Reply

Tragically for America, enough of our Uniparty politicians (both Democrats and RINOs) have proven themselves unreliable stewards of Top Secret Information that they cannot be trusted.

Scoring political points / undermining their political enemies are more important to them and their special interest constituencies than the safety of our military service personnel.

Thus, the moral decision clashed with the legislative - decision-process one.

(?-1). Is it better to ignore the (dual role of Congess + President) and protect the safety of our military personnel?

-or-

(?-2). Is it better to expose our military personnel to additional risk in order to honor the dual-role / decision-process protocol?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Youre finally right about something; congratulations!

1

Jun 22, 2025, 9:44 AM [ in reply to Re: To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement ]
Reply

It further illustrates how unfit Donny is to lead our great nation. I’m a Republican (most definitely not a MAGA) Democrats are our OPPONENTS; Iran is our ENEMY. That’s the biggest lie Trump tells; “America First”. No it’s MAGA first; he’ll put foreign nations ahead of fellow Americans if those Americans are on the wrong side of the aisle. You MAGA idiots have bought into the lie that Democrats hate America; they do not they just have a different vision for how to “make it great again”. If POTUS has an obligation to inform congress of an impending military action he has an obligation to do so along congressional assignments and roles not along party lines.


PS if his fear was that the bombing plans would be leaked then he introduced much more risk of that by telling his own secretary of defense now didn’t he?

2025 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Youre finally right about something; congratulations!


Jun 22, 2025, 10:24 AM
Reply

geech72® said:

I


PS if his fear was that the bombing plans would be leaked then he introduced much more risk of that by telling his own secretary of defense now didn’t he?



I wonder when Pete (and Tulsi) learned the bombers were in the air and the sun was ready to fire. I’m thinking after the fact. Probablyinutrd before the press conference. Pete would be fired if not for the optics. If he fired Pete Samson it would remind the viewers of TrumpWorld seasons 1-4 where there wa heavy cast turnover. As an experienced show runner, Trump wants seasons 5-8 (or 12) to have their own story lines other than turnover.

Stephen Miller has flexed his muscle as executive producer this season. That’s been interesting. Elon’s special guest star appearance brought ratings for a bit but his acting chops proved not to be up to the challenge.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement

1

Jun 22, 2025, 9:54 AM [ in reply to Re: To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement ]
Reply

It's not surprising. I don't think he should have either, at least as informing Congress.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Kind of like Ukraine not informing Trump of it's pending drone strike, yeah?


Jun 22, 2025, 11:26 AM [ in reply to Re: To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement ]
Reply

Very telling.

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yep, I wouldn't have either. Fukkin traitors***

1

Jun 22, 2025, 11:30 AM [ in reply to Re: To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement ]
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If she's a hollerer, she'll be a screamer.
If she's a screamer, she'll get you arrested.


Looks like CapnCrunch'sOS has been rolled back to 2001-2003.***


Jun 22, 2025, 11:53 AM
Reply



2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


You are a perfect example of why an IQ test should be part of voter registration***


Jun 22, 2025, 12:23 PM [ in reply to Yep, I wouldn't have either. Fukkin traitors*** ]
Reply



2025 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement

1

Jun 22, 2025, 10:23 AM
Reply

I don't think very highly of the Pres or some of the people he has put in some of the highest positions in government, but the list of people unhappy about this bombing effort is probably limited to the Iranian regime and people who blindly Trump no matter the issue.

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement

1

Jun 22, 2025, 10:24 AM
Reply

blindly hate

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The next several years will tell the geopolitical story of this military op.***

1

Jun 22, 2025, 10:28 AM [ in reply to Re: To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement ]
Reply



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It aint about hate its about being intellectually outgunned

1

Jun 22, 2025, 10:32 AM [ in reply to Re: To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement ]
Reply

we’re going to battle with DJU as our QB while a million Cades are sitting the bench and our opponent has their best in charge. We have far too many capable people in this country to have to endure this moron calling the shots.

2025 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement


Jun 22, 2025, 10:39 AM
Reply

All out war? With who? Iran? The nation that fought Saddam for a decade and frontline never moved an inch? Really? Not to concerned if Iran is who you fear.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Iran has two very large allies in Russia and China, theres certainly precedent


Jun 22, 2025, 11:02 AM
Reply

https://online.norwich.edu/six-causes-world-war-i

2025 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Iran has two very large allies in Russia and China, theres certainly precedent


Jun 22, 2025, 11:15 AM
Reply

Russia? They are a bit tied up at the moment. China may go to war over Taiwan but not Iran. Chinese is also invested far more in Iran’s ideology enemy Saudi Arabia.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Iran has two very large allies in Russia and China, theres certainly precedent


Jun 22, 2025, 11:20 AM
Reply

China and Saudi Aramco are heavily entwined in oil, refineries and petrochemical production. Saudi Arabia is thrilled to see Iran taken down a notch

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Iran has two very large allies in Russia and China, theres certainly precedent

1

Jun 22, 2025, 11:23 AM
Reply

China isn't though. They are allies. The Saudis condemned the attacks, but you known they're happy with them.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Iran has two very large allies in Russia and China, theres certainly precedent


Jun 22, 2025, 11:29 AM
Reply

The Saudis and Iranians flat out despise each other.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Iran has two very large allies in Russia and China, theres certainly precedent


Jun 22, 2025, 11:31 AM
Reply

Economically the Chinese are far more vested in in Saudis .

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Iran has two very large allies in Russia and China, theres certainly precedent


Jun 22, 2025, 11:35 AM
Reply

True, but China is Iran's largest trading partner as well and they matter. China takes most of Iran's oil exports. Iran matters to China.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Iran has two very large allies in Russia and China, theres certainly precedent


Jun 22, 2025, 11:33 AM [ in reply to Re: Iran has two very large allies in Russia and China, theres certainly precedent ]
Reply

Yeah, no shyt Einstein.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Pakistan as has already threatened Israel over the conflict with Iran


Jun 22, 2025, 11:57 AM [ in reply to Re: Iran has two very large allies in Russia and China, theres certainly precedent ]
Reply

It only takes a few countries to coalesce for other countries to be drawn in,

2025 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Who gives af

1

Jun 22, 2025, 10:55 AM
Reply

what a pathetic commie thinks.

2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Clearly you cared enough to read and respond; pathetic cult member***

2

Jun 22, 2025, 11:20 AM
Reply



2025 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement

1

Jun 22, 2025, 1:01 PM
Reply

Your TDS is unreal-Imagine Biden and Harris in charge---

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: To say that I think very little of Donald Trump is an epic understatement


Jun 22, 2025, 1:33 PM
Reply

Maybe it would be better for him? Who knows?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Woefully inept commander in chief, the least qualified secretary of Defense EVA?


Jun 22, 2025, 2:44 PM
Reply

Well, after the success of the operation they put together and executed flawlessly last night puts me in the corner of wanting more of those "unqualified" folks if position to protect our nation.

badge-donor-10yr.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

John 3:16; 14:1-6


Re: Woefully inept commander in chief, the least qualified secretary of Defense EVA?


Jun 22, 2025, 2:50 PM
Reply

How do you know it went flawlessly? How do you know it even worked?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

How do I know?


Jun 22, 2025, 8:56 PM
Reply

The Iranians haven't disputed it - not even a whisper of disagreement on what the US has claimed. Neither have they provided evidence of any plane shot down. The only thing they have done is vowed to retaliate. 'nuff said.

badge-donor-10yr.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

John 3:16; 14:1-6


Re: How do I know?


Jun 22, 2025, 9:26 PM
Reply

I’m not one to commonly agree with Lester, but in this case I do.

We are already getting a trickle of info that supports Iran’s claims that the attacks did not come close to ‘destroying’ Iran’s uranium enrichment capability. I think our best reasonable hope as of Sunday night June 22nd is that it will take many months (don’t ask me what constitutes “many”) before Iran can begin anew with Uranium enrichment.

There is satellite photography of Iran having a bevy of trucks leaving Fordow on … Thurs or Friday (well prior to June 21 attacks). What was in those trucks? Too many to be just carrying out enriched uranium stocks. I’m betting that they removed a bunch of equipment.

The question here is: How did Iran know … just one or two days prior to the secret surprise attack … to move out a bunch of stuff from Fordow?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Of course, anything is possible


Jun 22, 2025, 11:35 PM
Reply

There are always questions and conspiracies that arise out of these situations. Things that I might ask would include:

- If Iran knew the attack was coming then why didn't they shoot down any planes? The cost of the [whole] of their nuclear operations in those plants far exceeds the cost of any possible equipment that may have been moved. Certainly, Iran would want to exact some measure of [cost] against the US as well. I can't imagine they would pass on an opportunity to have a stealth bomber in hand... even if in pieces.

- The amount of equipment moved - if moved - would not be enough to establish a new production site. And where would they take the equipment? Certainly, if there are photos of trucks [leaving] then there are photos showing where they went. Another target site mapped out for the US or Isreal so easily? Not likely.

- If equipment was relocated, how hard will it be to destroy it in its new location? Israel can do that without US action - especially if it is not underground.

To say that the operation was not a success is, imo, not reflective of the truth. To say the planning of this operation (original OP insinuates) was completed by the most inept group of people in US history is, also, not reflective of the truth. The operation was planned and executed with a masterful touch. But, that is just my opinion, of course.

badge-donor-10yr.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

John 3:16; 14:1-6


Larry Coker won a natty with a team Butch Davis assembled


Jun 23, 2025, 12:38 PM [ in reply to Woefully inept commander in chief, the least qualified secretary of Defense EVA? ]
Reply

Petey the rapist was born on third; clearly you think he hit a triple


Our military is compromised of highly trained, highly, competent, highly intelligent professionals. They succeed in spite of, not because of, the losers Trump foisted upon them. It's a travesty that the welfare of such high caliber men and women who are the best of us has been placed into the hands of a collection of morons who don't deserve to be put in the same breath as the people they "lead".

2025 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 47
| visibility 3215
General Boards - Politics
add New Topic
Topics: Previous | Next