|
Replies: 24
| visibility 554
|
Team Captain [479]
TigerPulse: 99%
18
|
Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 8:32 PM
|
|
Underappreciated
Has played arguably even better than Ship happens
Anyone else agree?
He's been our top offensive weapon 2nd half of the season
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Beast [6545]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 8:33 PM
|
|
Great back. Can’t wait to see what those 2 accomplish next season. Only position group on the offensive side that wasn’t a disappointment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24894]
TigerPulse: 94%
54
Posts: 17252
Joined: 2002
|
Kobe Pace is appreciated
Jan 1, 2022, 8:33 PM
|
|
Thankfully Clemson has several great running backs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17205]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 18044
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 8:35 PM
|
|
We should play wildcat with ship and pace. No reason to even pretend we are going to throw.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [479]
TigerPulse: 99%
18
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 8:36 PM
|
|
Haha seriously sad but true
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3382]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 9:20 PM
[ in reply to Re: Kobe Pace ] |
|
Heck put Mafah back to there and let’s go wishbone! ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [8074]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 2, 2022, 1:10 PM
|
|
Offensive line is only issue with that. The wishbone is awesome but the QB needs to know how to run it and the line has to power block, not zone block. We get 0 push on runs…but they are decent at pass blocking
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [336]
TigerPulse: 88%
15
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 8:37 PM
|
|
Nope. Don’t agree. Ship, Kobe and Phil are all really good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [479]
TigerPulse: 99%
18
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 8:38 PM
|
|
Yeah but who has been the most productive?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12375]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 14746
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 8:45 PM
|
|
Ship probably, but not by a lot. I think all three backs are excellent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [101208]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 48690
Joined: 2009
|
Ship is a bit better since more versatile..
Jan 1, 2022, 9:16 PM
|
|
such as inside “and” outside running ability and pass catching (usually).
Pace more Bama-like power back but has good speed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24158]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13641
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 9:24 PM
[ in reply to Re: Kobe Pace ] |
|
Shipley (739) has more rushing yards than Pace (641), but Pace (6.2) has a higher yards/carry than Shipley (5.0)
Pace (131) has more receiving yards than Shipley (116) and a higher yards/catch (10.9 for Pace and 7.3 for Shipley)
Shipley (11) has more TDs than Pace (6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6791]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 9:18 PM
|
|
Power runner for sure. Pace and Shipley are one heck of a one- two punch. Awesome to have both plus Mafah!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8935]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 11815
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 9:19 PM
|
|
He has been very much appreciated.
Stop trying to stir up a non-event.
GEEEEZ!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [33892]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 14298
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 9:21 PM
|
|
Both are great running backs. Why are you trying to create controversy in the position group that has the best outlook in the team? Just needing to manufacture some drama where it isn’t needed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3895]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Pace is a stud. A shifty power back that we haven't had lately
Jan 1, 2022, 9:28 PM
|
|
Of course ETN is the greatest RB to ever play at Clemson, but I LOVE how Pace I'd patient, let's holes open, and runs low and behind his pads. He's going to have an outstanding career.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [121]
TigerPulse: 96%
11
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 9:38 PM
|
|
I definitely agree with you
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [855]
TigerPulse: 92%
23
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 9:42 PM
|
|
Hope to see a lot of two back set. Need those guys on the field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1336]
TigerPulse: 87%
28
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 9:50 PM
|
|
Need a QB and more diversity if we want to get back on Bama and Uga level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20911]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 15343
Joined: 2010
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 9:59 PM
|
|
Rushing
Will Shipley - 149 attempts, 739 yds, 5.0 ypc, long 42, 11 TD's
Kobe Pace - 104 attempts, 641 yds, 6.2 ypc, long 59, 6 TD's
Phil Mafah - 68 attempts, 292 yds, 4.3 ypc, long 63, 3 TD's
Receiving
Kobe Pace - 12 catches, 131 yds, 10.9 ypc, long 33, 0 TD's
Will Shipley - 16 catches, 116 yds, 7.3 ypc, long 19, 0 TD's
Phil Mafah - 7 catches, 50 yds, 7.1 ypc, long 15, 0 TD's
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 10:07 PM
|
|
I love pace.
I love Phil.
I love ship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1739]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Kobe Pace
Jan 1, 2022, 11:23 PM
|
|
Who doesn’t appreciate Pace? Man, I loved seeing the 2 back set with Pace and Ship both in there. IMO they’re basically interchangeable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [538]
TigerPulse: 70%
19
|
Pace also has great hands
Oct 3, 2012, 12:00 PM
|
|
I don’t recall him dropping a pass and of course Shipley dropped several. I’m a big Shipley fan, but I agree that Pace doesn’t get as much credit as he deserves. He is a really good player
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18904]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 11904
Joined: 2001
|
I like him a lot. Ran just as well as Shipley. Two back
Jan 2, 2022, 1:10 PM
|
|
set is a nice wrinkle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5259]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: I like him a lot. Ran just as well as Shipley. Two back
Jan 2, 2022, 2:32 PM
|
|
All three are studs, but those three are all we got. A RB room of 3 is very very thin. I would love to see all 3 of them on the field at the same time, and more of 2 of them also, but we will have to protect them and watch their carries. We CAN NOT afford an injury to any of those three in spring ball or fall camp.
Hopefully, ETN Jr comes here. I know he is projected to UF (which blows my mind considering D. Bowman isn't even seeing the field with all the RBs they have), but hopefully, he ends up here to make number four.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 24
| visibility 554
|
|
|
50
