|
Replies: 22
| visibility 2377
|
Legend [7061]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
KC Conceptcion not good enough to play at Clemson?
2
Oct 25, 2025, 10:03 PM
|
|
Are you kidding me? WOW.
|
|
|
|
 |
Starter [287]
TigerPulse: 74%
14
|
Re: KC Conceptcion not good enough to play at Clemson?
1
1
Oct 25, 2025, 10:07 PM
|
|
Why have good receivers, especially Wesco before injury. Also Concepcion would pick A&M and what they offer to transfers over us any day. You think if we could’ve gotten him we would’ve gotten Tristan Smith instead?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [287]
TigerPulse: 74%
14
|
Re: KC Conceptcion not good enough to play at Clemson?
1
Oct 25, 2025, 10:07 PM
|
|
*We
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [7061]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9929]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: KC Conceptcion not good enough to play at Clemson?
Oct 25, 2025, 11:28 PM
|
|
That post says we pursued and he chose A&M
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12796]
TigerPulse: 89%
47
Posts: 15223
Joined: 2004
|
Ehh?? Theyre OK..not great or elite.
1
Oct 25, 2025, 10:45 PM
[ in reply to Re: KC Conceptcion not good enough to play at Clemson? ] |
|
They’re definitely the best WR group we’ve had in 5 years when but that’s not saying much and they’re not even on the same PLANET as our WRs we had 2015-2019.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6433]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: KC Conceptcion not good enough to play at Clemson?
3
Oct 25, 2025, 10:07 PM
|
|
Again, when you only offer a handful of kids…..
We don’t need to offer 400 kids, but we need to offer more than 60 to 70 a year.
Who has it figured out us ….or Bama and Ohio State?
Roster management 101
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [287]
TigerPulse: 74%
14
|
Re: KC Conceptcion not good enough to play at Clemson?
1
1
Oct 25, 2025, 10:08 PM
|
|
Players will always get more money at A&M
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [36592]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 15242
Joined: 1998
|
Re: KC Conceptcion not good enough to play at Clemson?
3
Oct 25, 2025, 10:10 PM
|
|
We got Cole.... the speed is on a different level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [287]
TigerPulse: 74%
14
|
Re: KC Conceptcion not good enough to play at Clemson?
1
Oct 25, 2025, 10:11 PM
|
|
Cole does have good speed. Not sure how that relates to us not being able to compete financially with A&M for a marquee transfer wideout like Concepcion. Also, Cole is quite far down our receiver depth chart, Concepcion is at the top of A&M’s
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4552]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: KC Conceptcion not good enough to play at Clemson?
1
Oct 25, 2025, 10:11 PM
|
|
Why did he leave Dave ?
I have the confused
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16915]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 10625
Joined: 2009
|
Seriously how did this become the complaint of the day?
Oct 25, 2025, 10:18 PM
|
|
He was the 93rd ranked receiver in his class. TEXAS A&M DIDN’T OFFER HIM EITHER! Nor did Jawja, SC, Bama, FL, 0310 state, OU, Michigan…. Are all of those staffs idiots too? 2 years later he was the top receiver in the portal, we were never gonna outbid TX A&M; so what is your complaint?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [54081]
TigerPulse: 79%
59
Posts: 38731
Joined: 2003
|
We probably didnt even try.***
1
Oct 25, 2025, 10:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16915]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 10625
Joined: 2009
|
Show me
Oct 25, 2025, 10:53 PM
|
|
you seem convinced you must have some concrete evidence that gave you that impression. I mean we did sign a receiver from the portal this year; so, clearly we were in the market. So why are you so convinced that, even thought the evidence proves we were in the market for a receiver, you believe we didn’t even attempt to sign the top receiver in the portal?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet HOFer [125875]
TigerPulse: 100%
66
Posts: 79682
Joined: 2003
|
just stop
1
1
Oct 25, 2025, 10:19 PM
|
|
you have been non-stop complaining about anything and everything. I don't know the kid, but possibly he wanted to go to a liberal city school, or the coaches did not think he was fit for our culture. You do not know what you do not know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [7061]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16915]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 10625
Joined: 2009
|
So youre not even original enough to come up with your own complaints***
Oct 25, 2025, 10:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [287]
TigerPulse: 74%
14
|
Re: just stop
1
Oct 25, 2025, 10:26 PM
[ in reply to just stop ] |
|
Yep. And was noted above, Concepcion was not a specifically highly rated recruit out of high school. Thus why NC State was able to get him. Once he proved himself there, and was the top transfer wideout available, A&M was going to win the bidding war with almost anyone even involved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1868]
TigerPulse: 93%
31
|
Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, liberal? College Station - liberal?***
1
Oct 25, 2025, 10:27 PM
[ in reply to just stop ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [54081]
TigerPulse: 79%
59
Posts: 38731
Joined: 2003
|
A liberal city school likeTexas A&M in College Station, TX?
1
2
Oct 25, 2025, 10:46 PM
[ in reply to just stop ] |
|
LMAO
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6433]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: just stop
1
Oct 25, 2025, 10:48 PM
[ in reply to just stop ] |
|
I was just in college Station a few weeks ago
Lulz at it being liberal. Quite the opposite. More conservative than Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19120]
TigerPulse: 95%
52
Posts: 28831
Joined: 2003
|
Liberal city...straight clown answer***
Oct 26, 2025, 12:16 AM
[ in reply to just stop ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1071]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: KC Conceptcion not good enough to play at Clemson?
Oct 26, 2025, 7:46 AM
|
|
Yes he is good enough. He is also good enough to play at Ohio State, Bama and UGA. They didn’t take him either. He was a package deal with his brother to A&M. They was no way Clemson was paying for another teams WR1.
You have to pay for these players and KC would be minimal additional return over what we already have on the roster at that position.
If your example had been 2 starter quality safies or 2 to 3 offensive lineman or even a linebacker to start in front of Woodazz ( Alexander was a nice get but he was buried on the Bama depth chart) the point would have been valid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 22
| visibility 2377
|
|
|
50
