|
Replies: 15
| visibility 51
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46706
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Ferrell reacts to possible Clemson-Alabama fatigue
Jan 2, 2019, 11:41 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1640]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: TNET: Ferrell reacts to possible Clemson-Alabama fatigue
Jan 2, 2019, 11:46 AM
|
|
My Take on playoffs..if you don't want Alabama and Clemson in then beat us. From what I saw the only top 6 team that might have a gripe is Ohio State. Don't know if they are that good or Washington is that bad. If Washington is the best the Pac-12 has then I see why that conference gets left out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24212]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 24534
Joined: 2003
|
Had Ohio State not blown it to Purdue, they would be in over
Jan 3, 2019, 1:19 PM
|
|
Oklahoma.
They probably would have been ahead of Notre Dame too.
EVERY GAME MATTERS. It's awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [56]
TigerPulse: 84%
6
|
Re: TNET: Ferrell reacts to possible Clemson-Alabama fatigue
Jan 2, 2019, 11:50 AM
|
|
Truth!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11758]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Clemson-Alabama fatigue
Jan 2, 2019, 12:01 PM
|
|
Sounds like another sec excuse since "not wanting to be there" won't work for bama in this game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62833]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62850
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Clemson-Alabama fatigue
Jan 2, 2019, 12:08 PM
|
|
If Bama loses, Nick Saban and that team won't be making any excuses I don't think. Excuses are for when you fail to do your best, and I don't see them doing that!!! Excuses are for losers that didn't try to do their best....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [360]
TigerPulse: 93%
16
|
Re: Clemson-Alabama fatigue
Jan 2, 2019, 12:53 PM
|
|
Its more Alabama fatigue than anything. Most other fans are sick and tired of seeing them their every year. Yeah, you have to take it from them, but when it gets predictable other fan bases stop watching. Most will be watching this year to see Clemson slay the dragon...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4611]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
This is why we need at least, 8 team playoff, ideally 16
Jan 2, 2019, 1:33 PM
|
|
Again, winner of each FBS Conference goes + 6 wildcards. Winner of this Sweet 16 of College Football is of course, THE Champion. Lose a Cupcake Game to make room.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4611]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Furthermore, ALL teams required ..,
Jan 2, 2019, 1:39 PM
|
|
Play three games outside of Conference eight in Conference. All Three OOC must be dispersed. Ie. Clemson three OOC games against
- 1 SEC team (USCAR)
- 1 B10 Team
- 1 B12 or P12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11587]
TigerPulse: 86%
46
Posts: 14639
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62833]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62850
Joined: 2007
|
Re: i see nothing wrong with the current system
Jan 2, 2019, 2:06 PM
|
|
I have been singing pretty much the same song when they refused to bring their FB into the ACC along with the rest of their sports. They refuse to be in a conference with FB, that says loud and clear that they have no intentions of playing in a conference championship with FB, so they should be automatically suspend from any game that a conference champions has an edge of getting in!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [386]
TigerPulse: 88%
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20954]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
But you could play that game all day long...
Jan 2, 2019, 8:58 PM
|
|
#9 in a 8 team playoff would be crying, #17 in a 16 team playoff would be crying. They would all have their legitimate reasons (at least in their view). Just look at how teams and fanbases ##### and moan about being the first bubble team out in March Madness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8867]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: This is why we need at least, 8 team playoff, ideally 16
Jan 2, 2019, 9:00 PM
[ in reply to This is why we need at least, 8 team playoff, ideally 16 ] |
|
No school is going to give up a home game. The Athletic Dept, the University as hole and the city would loose too much revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11405]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13357
Joined: 2014
|
It's working pretty well for us, as is. Going to 8 or 16
Jan 2, 2019, 9:09 PM
[ in reply to This is why we need at least, 8 team playoff, ideally 16 ] |
|
Will just require us to win one or two more games, to get to the championship game. Now, if you are in the PAC 12 or Big 10, yeah...I can understand why you want to get more teams in it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24212]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 24534
Joined: 2003
|
"This" meaning what? Clemson and Bama again?
Jan 3, 2019, 1:17 PM
[ in reply to This is why we need at least, 8 team playoff, ideally 16 ] |
|
What's wrong with the two best teams playing for it all?
The system we have now is much better than an 8 team playoff.
The further degradation of the importance of EVERY GAME should not take place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 51
|
|
|
50
