|
Replies: 22
| visibility 312
|
Tiger Spirit [9805]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
X man still in the doghouse? He didn’t play against
Oct 7, 2019, 8:17 PM
|
|
Uncheat
|
|
|
|
 |
Solid Orange [1300]
TigerPulse: 94%
28
|
Re: X man still in the doghouse? He didn’t play against
Oct 7, 2019, 8:20 PM
|
|
He made the game saving tackle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 26231
Joined: 2011
|
He must have been in the cat house
Oct 7, 2019, 8:31 PM
|
|
'cause he pounced like a Tiger on Howell to save the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16786]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
Re: X man still in the doghouse? He didn’t play against
Oct 7, 2019, 8:20 PM
|
|
LOL. He was a key player on the 2 point conversion stop at UNC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9805]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: X man still in the doghouse? He didn’t play against
Oct 7, 2019, 8:33 PM
|
|
Was reading the playing time article, thought it said he didn’t play. Glad he got to play. Guess I need to go back to Evelyn woodhead sped Redding skool
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Immortal [177479]
TigerPulse: 100%
69
Posts: 29399
Joined: 2012
|
Or you could have watched the game!
Oct 7, 2019, 8:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4837]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5618]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: X man still in the doghouse? He didn’t play against
Oct 7, 2019, 9:40 PM
|
|
I thought that was Cheech and Chong
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [66057]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 49536
Joined: 2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4837]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: It was ...
Oct 8, 2019, 3:43 PM
|
|
Yes, it was. My bad. My memory ain't what it used to be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [60161]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 45325
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [103848]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 26527
Joined: 2006
|
He made the biggest play in the game. ??***
Oct 7, 2019, 8:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19693]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 11984
Joined: 2001
|
Thomas played. Kelly did not.***
Oct 7, 2019, 8:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [715]
TigerPulse: 100%
22
|
Re: Thomas played. Kelly did not.***
Oct 8, 2019, 9:21 PM
|
|
Not the Kelly Bryant stuff again. I thought we were past all that. Geez....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2017]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: X man still in the doghouse? He didn’t play against
Oct 7, 2019, 9:18 PM
|
|
Didn't watch the game?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3438]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: X man still in the doghouse? He didn’t play against
Oct 8, 2019, 6:45 PM
|
|
He was literally the first player listed on the defensive player list and had more snaps on anyone on the DL with 45 snaps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1188]
TigerPulse: 88%
26
|
Re: X man still in the doghouse? He didn’t play against
Oct 8, 2019, 7:38 PM
|
|
XT is Thomas ... X-Man is Kelly. X-Man did not play. XT made the game saving tackle. Two unknowns and only one equation ... hard to sol;ve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3438]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: X man still in the doghouse? He didn’t play against
Oct 8, 2019, 9:01 PM
|
|
When has Xavier Kelly ever been referred to as X Man?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [51177]
TigerPulse: 79%
58
Posts: 37224
Joined: 2003
|
This illustrates the idiocy in everyone having to have a freaking nickname.
Oct 8, 2019, 9:03 PM
[ in reply to Re: X man still in the doghouse? He didn’t play against ] |
|
It’s a shame that people today can’t be bothered to refer to people by their actual names. Could’ve avoided a lot of confusion and wasted time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11432]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13375
Joined: 2014
|
Amen, Judge! Did it really save the OP that much time to
Oct 8, 2019, 9:26 PM
|
|
type X-man, instead of X Kelly?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5493]
TigerPulse: 89%
38
Posts: 11946
Joined: 2001
|
Re: X man still in the doghouse? He didn’t play against
Oct 8, 2019, 9:25 PM
|
|
Did you even bother to watch the game ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5493]
TigerPulse: 89%
38
Posts: 11946
Joined: 2001
|
Re: X man still in the doghouse? He didn’t play against
Oct 8, 2019, 9:27 PM
|
|
Ok coot
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1186]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Re: X man still in the doghouse? He didn’t play against
Oct 8, 2019, 9:28 PM
|
|
Confusing post is confusing.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 22
| visibility 312
|
|
|
50
