Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
I thought yall said they weren't doing this?
General Boards - Politics
add New Topic
Topics: Previous | Next
Replies: 20
| visibility 1475

I thought yall said they weren't doing this?

3

Jul 9, 2025, 12:57 PM
Reply

https://newrepublic.com/post/197718/house-democrats-demand-release-epstein-files-naming-trump

2025 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

IE Rents


Only the files naming Trump? Thats odd.***

1

Jul 9, 2025, 1:01 PM
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Trump should really stick it to the Democrats and release all of it.

2

Jul 9, 2025, 1:05 PM
Reply

HAHAHAHAHA, just kidding. You got completely, anabashedly duped, and now you're angry. We get it.

Notice you're the only one sticking around today. RTD, NJDEV, and NCTiger23whatever skipped town.

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I feel nothing. Just an odd request. Only 1 persons file

1

Jul 9, 2025, 1:17 PM
Reply

from the thousands?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Is it odd though?

1

Jul 9, 2025, 1:27 PM
Reply

There is literally only ONE logical reason it isn't being released, assuming it exists. See if you can get there. It's within your grasp.

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

What was the ONE reason the Biden DOJ didn't release the "list"? Their love of T

2

Jul 9, 2025, 1:50 PM
Reply

for Trump? Your "logic" must be contrived between lunch and recess.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Probably because, as you've posted several thousand times,

2

Jul 9, 2025, 1:55 PM
Reply

Biden wasn't in charge of anything and was merely a puppet. More powerful, shadowy people made the decisions. Trump, however, is undeniably in charge...right? Or is he not?

Big moment for you, Kiwi. Think carefully.

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'll take that gibberish as your surrender on the matter.***

1

Jul 9, 2025, 2:15 PM
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You poor guy.

1

Jul 9, 2025, 2:28 PM
Reply

Blaming Democrats for your exalted leader taking a steaming dump in your mouth is all you have left. Thoughts and prayers.

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I have no idea if a list exists


Jul 9, 2025, 2:07 PM [ in reply to What was the ONE reason the Biden DOJ didn't release the "list"? Their love of T ]
Reply

And I have no idea whether Trump would be on it (if it does exist).

With that said, I'd guess the reason it wasn't release (again, if it exists) during EITHER administration is that it contains some VERY embarrassing (from a national standpoint) names. Possible, even likely, names from both sides of the aisle, or potentially national security level embarrassment.

But I also think it quite possible that Epstein wasn't *that* sort of villain. A villain for #### sure, but not one which kept a little black book of folks to extort. Or maybe he did? We likely will never know, though I'd be all for an actual non-partisan investigation.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Gonna be a few dems on there too. Clinton?***

1

Jul 9, 2025, 1:05 PM
Reply



2025 white level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

https://as1.ftcdn.net/v2/jpg/00/81/16/28/1000_F_81162810_8TlZDomtVuVGlyqWL2I4HA7Wlqw7cr5a.jpg


If the list exists, release it

9

Jul 9, 2025, 1:09 PM
Reply

And #### to hell anyone, on either side of the aisle, who partook in sex acts with underage folks or who knew and covered it up.

Don't care what positions they are in or whose "side" they are on.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


A list of names only doesnt really prove anything without other evidence


Jul 9, 2025, 2:10 PM
Reply

We know Epstein hung out with the big wigs in New York. Names without context or collaborating info just leads to more speculation and conspiracy. Maybe just not enough evidence for an indictment let only conviction?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Sure, and that's why I think the debate isn't just

2

Jul 9, 2025, 2:18 PM
Reply

Is there a list or isn't there a list, but rather what would a list even mean.

I also think at some point the only way to get to the truth is to sift through the names (again, if there is a list) and investigate. But that ain't gonna happen. It would appear neither side (or any side) is really interested in that (or at least not in a non partisan actual investigation).

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: I thought yall said they weren't doing this?

1

Jul 9, 2025, 1:29 PM
Reply

Any and everything should be released completely unredacted.

If it’s conclusive that Trump engaged in sex with underage people, he should be thrown out of office and into jail.

I suspect if there was incriminating evidence of Trump involved with this, it would have already been released by the Biden Administration, but pervs are in both parties, so who knows.

It is odd that after all the squawking about this that the Trump Administration now says there’s nothing to see and let’s move along.

This deserves a thorough investigation by Congress and by investigative reporters.

I’m not sure that Trump was directly involved, but the fact that I likewise wouldn’t be surprised if he were, is a pretty damning commentary on Trump’s proven lack of character.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I thought yall said they weren't doing this?

1

Jul 9, 2025, 1:46 PM
Reply

rons1® said:

Any and everything should be released completely unredacted.

If it’s conclusive that Trump engaged in sex with underage people, he should be thrown out of office and into jail.

I suspect if there was incriminating evidence of Trump involved with this, it would have already been released by the Biden Administration, but pervs are in both parties, so who knows.

It is odd that after all the squawking about this that the Trump Administration now says there’s nothing to see and let’s move along.

This deserves a thorough investigation by Congress and by investigative reporters.

I’m not sure that Trump was directly involved, but the fact that I likewise wouldn’t be surprised if he were, is a pretty damning commentary on Trump’s proven lack of character.




I can almost guarantee you it wasn't released during Biden's time because it has names of a lotttttt of folks on both sides of the aisle and other powerful people around the world. That list ain't being made public unless everyone is outted and I would put money on that is why it ain't seeing the light of day. I wouldn't be shocked if the big dogs on all sides agreed to this and what we're seeing now is just political show from some that want to be on record calling for the release of the files.

2025 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That the Epstein thing is being used for Partisan points is infuriating.

3

Jul 9, 2025, 1:54 PM
Reply

There is no side of the political spectrum that should be happy with anyone regarding this whole issue. The files have now sat through different two administrations (one of which...correct me if I'm wrong, ran on a "We'll release the records, day one" type of platform) and nothing. And we're not talking about tax evasion. We're talking about sex trafficking and minors. And we're talking about the highest powers. This isn't "he got a ride on a private jet and didn't report it on form blah-d-blah" where we get mad if it's the other side but look the other way if its ours. The current administration really wants us to believe that they found NOTHING that would incriminate ANYONE? Then release all the records and show us how they were mostly having laser tag tournaments on his private island.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


Re: That the Epstein thing is being used for Partisan points is infuriating.

1

Jul 9, 2025, 2:13 PM
Reply

One party is mad the pedos are apparently gonna get away with it and the other party is spiking the ball, acting like its the greatest day ever and cheering because they think this will hurt Trump (and they may be right on that point). They couldn't care less about the pedos being held accountable and/or completely believe this entire thing was just two pervy people, hundreds of trafficked children and absolutely nobody else. In other words they aren't very smart and view absolutely everything through a political lense.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You ready to apologize yet?***


Jul 9, 2025, 2:16 PM
Reply



2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


bruh

1

Jul 9, 2025, 2:24 PM [ in reply to Re: That the Epstein thing is being used for Partisan points is infuriating. ]
Reply

like

bruh

2025 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

drunk at the putt putt.


Hilarious commentary coming from the likes of you.


Jul 9, 2025, 2:29 PM [ in reply to Re: That the Epstein thing is being used for Partisan points is infuriating. ]
Reply

"Viewing everything through a political lens", lulz.

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 20
| visibility 1475
General Boards - Politics
add New Topic
Topics: Previous | Next