|
Replies: 19
| visibility 2425
|
Orange Beast [6455]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
I saw that the GW FG couldve been negated by subbing and running the time off
9
9
Sep 13, 2025, 4:08 PM
|
|
Yeah I rewinded to look at something else and realized this.
I wish I had never found this out
This is shattering
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Tiger [36586]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 15237
Joined: 1998
|
Re: I saw that the GW FG couldve been negated by subbing and running the time off
Sep 13, 2025, 4:09 PM
|
|
Yep……coaching.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28422]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16782
Joined: 2018
|
Re: I saw that the GW FG couldve been negated by subbing and running the time off
Sep 13, 2025, 4:10 PM
|
|
Not with our brain trust on the sideline…
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11142]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: I saw that the GW FG couldve been negated by subbing and running the time off
Sep 13, 2025, 4:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [25970]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 16603
Joined: 1995
|
ROY, I take no pleasure in telling you this but Dabo has been surrounding....
4
Sep 13, 2025, 4:10 PM
|
|
...himself with sycophants and yes men. Conn? Have you seen our safeties? Don't get me started on the rest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6455]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: ROY, I take no pleasure in telling you this but Dabo has been surrounding....
Sep 13, 2025, 4:16 PM
|
|
How many licks does it take to get to the center of a lollipop?
How many coaching terminations does it take to figure out that Dabo is the problem
Dabo’s special formula and special talent was bringing the right people together and doing what he does best, motivating them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1555]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
Dabos special formula???
2
Sep 13, 2025, 4:28 PM
|
|
Probably more like Terry Don Phillips and even Radakovich vetoed the nepo hires. Neff is just another yes man letting Dabo hire who he wants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [49]
TigerPulse: 100%
5
|
Re: Dabos special formula???
Sep 13, 2025, 6:25 PM
|
|
Just posted this exact thing on another forum. Neff is nothing but another Dabo lackey and with the loss of Venerables…. I love Dabo, but he’s not good without checks and balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1777]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: I saw that the GW FG couldve been negated by subbing and running the time off
Sep 13, 2025, 4:23 PM
|
|
And now I'm sad for knowing this too. ChatGPT confirms. And we should have been smarter and sent the game to overtime:
What Happens in Your Case
Offense rushes the field goal unit on with ~12 seconds left, clock running.
By rule, the defense must be allowed to substitute. The official will hold the snap until they do.
If this delay causes time to expire, that’s just the consequence — the offense took the risk by subbing without a timeout.
So yes: the defense absolutely has the right to sub in this situation, and the officials would enforce it by standing over the ball. That can, in practice, run out the clock and send the game to overtime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [609]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Re: I saw that the GW FG couldve been negated by subbing and running the time off
Sep 13, 2025, 4:29 PM
|
|
Holy crap. Great job Dabo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Cub [18]
TigerPulse: 100%
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [25970]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 16603
Joined: 1995
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [197]
TigerPulse: 81%
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Cub [18]
TigerPulse: 100%
2
|
Re: I saw that the GW FG couldve been negated by subbing and running the time off
Sep 13, 2025, 4:44 PM
|
|
If the eventual kick is made, coach will always be second-guessed..... I was surprised, only because he's attempted to freeze kickers in the past. I understand putting the pressure on GT to substitute and execute - just didn't work out this time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [60]
TigerPulse: 100%
7
|
Re: I saw that the GW FG couldve been negated by subbing and running the time off
Sep 13, 2025, 4:52 PM
[ in reply to Re: I saw that the GW FG couldve been negated by subbing and running the time off ] |
|
Yes, and it's not only about icing the kicker...if he misses the FG we have the ball at close to midfield with a TO; if he makes it, well, we improbably responded in a similar situation in ACC Championship game. Best choice there is to sub and bleed clock out; next best choice obviously to call timeout
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28422]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16782
Joined: 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [25]
TigerPulse: 87%
3
|
Re: I saw that the GW FG couldve been negated by subbing and running the time off
Sep 13, 2025, 4:54 PM
|
|
Who cares. This season is over anyway
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8505]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 16362
Joined: 2001
|
End of half/end of game has a different rule
1
Sep 13, 2025, 6:20 PM
|
|
stop using AI to provide facts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14959]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 24052
Joined: 2004
|
I'm 99% sure that isn't true
Sep 13, 2025, 6:22 PM
|
|
That rule doesnt apply for end of half situations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1777]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: I'm 99% sure that isn't true
1
Sep 13, 2025, 6:27 PM
|
|
Good to know…seems like an obvious loophole teams could exploit to prevent last second field goals when no timeouts left…like today. 🤣
From the rules, (according to the internet):
Late in the first half Team A is out of timeouts. A pass play on third down ends inbounds at the B-25 short of the line to gain with the game clock showing 0:10. Facing fourth down and three, Team A immediately hurries its field goal team onto the field. RULING: Team B should reasonably expect that Team A will attempt a field goal in this situation and should have its field-goal defense unit ready. The umpire will not stand over the ball, as there should be no issue of the defense being uncertain about the next play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 19
| visibility 2425
|
|
|
50
