Replies: 17
| visibility 3301
|
Varsity [146]
TigerPulse: 97%
11
|
Cade Snubbed
4
Nov 26, 2024, 1:56 PM
|
|
Shame he isn't a finalist for the Davey O Brian. He deserves more than Sanders.
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22140]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14130
Joined: 2002
|
Don't lose to Louisville.
2
Nov 26, 2024, 2:02 PM
|
|
And I agree on Sanders...he's a bum.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6837]
TigerPulse: 96%
41
|
Re: Cade Snubbed
4
Nov 26, 2024, 2:16 PM
|
|
Watson and Lawrence were snubbed as well. If you not SEC or Big 10 you don’t qualify. Lawrence and Watson not winning the Heisman was just the SEC and Big 10 politics.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Pro [710]
TigerPulse: 97%
22
|
Re: Cade Snubbed
1
Nov 26, 2024, 2:17 PM
|
|
Lamar Jackson was in the acc too… although I agree Deshaun was better.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Pro [710]
TigerPulse: 97%
22
|
Re: Cade Snubbed
1
Nov 26, 2024, 2:17 PM
[ in reply to Re: Cade Snubbed ] |
|
Lamar Jackson was in the acc too… although I agree Deshaun was better.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24158]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13641
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Cade Snubbed
5
5
Nov 26, 2024, 2:24 PM
[ in reply to Re: Cade Snubbed ] |
|
Watson won the Davey O'Brien award in 2015 and 2016. Only 1 of the 3 finalists this year (Dillon Gabriel) plays in the SEC or B1G. Shedeur Sanders and Cam Ward are the other 2 finalists.
|
|
|
|
 |
Valley Legend [12187]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
Re: Cade Snubbed
3
Nov 26, 2024, 2:29 PM
|
|
Yeah you’re right. Facts are stubborn things.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Sanders is more valuable to his team.
4
Nov 26, 2024, 2:28 PM
|
|
Sanders #5 in passing this year. Cade is #20.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet HOFer [134663]
TigerPulse: 100%
66
Posts: 60077
Joined: 2009
|
Cade is #3 in TDs (not thumbs down)***
2
Nov 26, 2024, 2:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14504]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
|
Sanders is #2***
1
Nov 26, 2024, 3:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Recruit [61]
TigerPulse: 65%
7
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
More passing means that a good QB is more valuable
1
Nov 26, 2024, 3:40 PM
|
|
than a QB that hands off 50% of the time.
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [2053]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
I wish Cade was on the list
1
Nov 26, 2024, 2:49 PM
|
|
but statistically Sanders is much better. Cade gets the nod in rushing but that's really it. If character factored into it, then Sanders would certainly be left out.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Sanders gets sacked more.
1
1
Nov 26, 2024, 3:40 PM
|
|
That hurts his rushing stats.
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [8062]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 10826
Joined: 2007
|
i put Cade just above that Kyle Parker level here at Clemson. (past 20 yrs)
2
Nov 26, 2024, 3:00 PM
|
|
not quite to the Tajh Boyd/Woody Dantzler level. And then a ways down from the DW4/TL16 level. So when I think of qb awards I'm thinking yeah he's got a ways still to go to be in that conversation.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14504]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
|
Id probably put him a little ahead of Tajh
Nov 26, 2024, 3:09 PM
|
|
Take a look at the players Tajh had around him and think what Cade’s numbers would look like with those guys. No offense to the talent we have now, but Tajh had 6 NFL receivers, an NFL RB, and an NFL TE; I’m not sure that’s what we have right now.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14504]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
|
Cade has had a great year much better than I expected; Im impressed with his
2
Nov 26, 2024, 3:06 PM
|
|
growth this year. BUT, those other three guys have much higher QB ratings, more yards, and better completion percentages; 2 of the 3 have more TDs. Those will also probably be the top 3 QBs taken in the draft this year.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [27579]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 18498
Joined: 2024
|
Re: Cade Snubbed
1
Nov 26, 2024, 5:05 PM
|
|
I don't think he deserves it more than Sanders. JMO
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 3301
|
|
|