|
Replies: 24
| visibility 151
|
110%er [7390]
TigerPulse: 90%
42
|
If the SCU LameCrocs beat us a 5th time in a row next season
Jan 18, 2013, 9:59 PM
|
|
I'm afraid I may have to go back into hibernation for another 20 years. Somebody else will have to be Warren's jester.
P.S. Clowney is mad slow.
|
|
|
|
 |
Aficionado [174]
TigerPulse: 34%
12
|
Re: If the SCU LameCrocs beat us a 5th time in a row next season
Jan 18, 2013, 10:10 PM
|
|
Well it will probably happen but I will not hide. I don't ride the winning wagon and I think we lose this year but 2014 we should be back on the winning track. This rivalry is going to be neck and neck from here on out. The dominance we had will not be and they will not dominate like they have lately. The teams are too close in talent for that to happen every year again. The only problems I see is we may have to replace an OC or DC during that time. It always changes things when that happens but I think with Dabo, the stability will be better suited for a transition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6938]
TigerPulse: 88%
41
Posts: 22593
Joined: 2003
|
ReThe next change will be a head coach. Spurrier will quit
Jan 18, 2013, 10:31 PM
|
|
and if get beat again, Dabo will be fired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [942]
TigerPulse: 59%
24
|
I agree. I don't see Dabo surviving a record 5th staright
Jan 18, 2013, 10:36 PM
|
|
loss to SCAR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1103]
TigerPulse: 95%
26
|
Let's say
Jan 18, 2013, 10:40 PM
|
|
11-1 or 10-2, BCS or BCS level bowl.
Do you realistically see him getting fired for that?
I honestly don't think we're going to lose again, but in the above scenario we're not going to fire the coach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7390]
TigerPulse: 90%
42
|
I think wee should start a neww conference with Texas;
Jan 18, 2013, 10:49 PM
|
|
then add Alabama, Notre Dame, Kansas State, Miami, Idaho, UNLV, USC, Vanderbilt, Louisville, Penn State, UNC, Virginia, Wisconsin, Michigan, n' Stanford!!
Yay Super Conference!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3677]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
I know you miss me but this is crazy
Jan 18, 2013, 10:55 PM
|
|
take your pistacio ice cream and ................ a
and call me maybe ?
Message was edited by: Tigers84a®
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7390]
TigerPulse: 90%
42
|
I sent you some smoke signals! <3***
Jan 18, 2013, 11:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6938]
TigerPulse: 88%
41
Posts: 22593
Joined: 2003
|
Re:That will not work anymore.***
Jan 19, 2013, 10:52 AM
[ in reply to Let's say ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18213]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 22450
Joined: 1999
|
Good thing you have nothing to do with any
Jan 19, 2013, 10:57 AM
|
|
decision re Dabo. If up to you, you would have fired him at halftime 13 times this year alone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4506]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Anybody knows that Dabo won't be fired. Would be stupid
Jan 19, 2013, 3:47 PM
[ in reply to Let's say ] |
|
to do so. Some people are so obsessed with the coots that they had rather go 1-11 with a coot win than 11-1 with a coot loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2833]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: ReThe next change will be a head coach. Spurrier will quit
Jan 18, 2013, 11:31 PM
[ in reply to ReThe next change will be a head coach. Spurrier will quit ] |
|
Do you honestly believe that? If so.....all I can say is WOW! There's a big picture here and it's more than your bragging rights at the water cooler.
I hate losing to them too but they are simply better than us right now. We are closing the gap, maybe enough to beat them this coming year.
I just can't understand this whole idea that our coach, who is 21-6 the last two years and probably another 10 or 11 wins next season will be fired if we lose again next year. Good gosh, even considering that idea is embarrassing. SMH.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1321]
TigerPulse: 97%
28
|
Didn't you hear? Coaches are fired left and right for
Jan 19, 2013, 6:58 PM
|
|
doing exceptionally well but not winning the national championship. They're ready to run Miles out of town right now in Baton Rouge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7390]
TigerPulse: 90%
42
|
You got that right!
Jan 20, 2013, 2:51 AM
|
|
He'd make a fine Clemson o-line coach! He did something right against Steve El Slurrier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62696]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62744
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [55379]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 44238
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7390]
TigerPulse: 90%
42
|
I miss Nuk already. :/***
Jan 19, 2013, 6:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3677]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Awwwwwwwwwwww
Jan 18, 2013, 10:36 PM
|
|
GO TIGERS, omg please
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3599]
TigerPulse: 34%
34
Posts: 10450
Joined: 2001
|
LOL, well then Boyd is slower.***
Jan 19, 2013, 9:08 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: LOL, well then Boyd is slower.***
Jan 19, 2013, 9:12 AM
|
|
Not necessarily. It's called angles.
A defensive end can close on a quarterback, even if the quarterback is faster, due to ANGLES. That, and the fact that a QB moves backwards/laterally a lot, further perpetuates the importance of ANGLES.
Please learn a bit about football before opening your mouth and looking like an idiot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
slow as molasses in January
Jan 19, 2013, 9:18 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18213]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 22450
Joined: 1999
|
This thread sure brought out the trolls.
Jan 19, 2013, 9:14 AM
|
|
Unbelievable BS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2608]
TigerPulse: 90%
33
|
Why do you post stuff like this?***
Jan 19, 2013, 1:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7390]
TigerPulse: 90%
42
|
To be completely honest with you, you are
Jan 19, 2013, 3:19 PM
|
|
absolutely cerrect if you think I don't have better things to do than to try to rouse up some foosball conversation amongst TigerNation world wide.
Also, my Cirque du Soleil 'Saltimbanco' torrent hasn't finished downloading yet.
Go Cougars! J/k!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2776]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: If the SCU LameCrocs beat us a 5th time in a row next season
Jan 19, 2013, 3:03 PM
|
|
"Dr. the patient is flatlining"...
As the moniter goes beeeeeeeeep
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 24
| visibility 151
|
|
|
50
