|
Replies: 18
| visibility 4543
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 48612
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: National predictions have 4-star Clemson QB target heading to Big Ten school
1
1
Jul 7, 2025, 1:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
MVP [547]
TigerPulse: 96%
19
|
Re: TNET: National predictions have 4-star Clemson QB target heading to Big Ten school
4
Jul 7, 2025, 1:56 PM
|
|
I remember when USC was a thing.l
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22795]
TigerPulse: 99%
53
Posts: 19722
Joined: 2004
|
Re: TNET: National predictions have 4-star Clemson QB target heading to Big Ten school
3
Jul 7, 2025, 2:00 PM
|
|
Riley starting to get things done there..beat A&M in bowl game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9926]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: TNET: National predictions have 4-star Clemson QB target heading to Big Ten school
3
Jul 7, 2025, 2:23 PM
|
|
A&M lost 5 games
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2005]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6983]
TigerPulse: 99%
41
|
Re: TNET: National predictions have 4-star Clemson QB target heading to Big Ten school
2
Jul 7, 2025, 2:00 PM
|
|
Makes sense. We need to go all in on Seaborn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6871]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Nope, the other two have much better film*******
2
Jul 7, 2025, 2:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6983]
TigerPulse: 99%
41
|
Re: Nope, the other two have much better film*******
Jul 7, 2025, 7:25 PM
|
|
Recruiting analysts disagree with you. So who knows..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6545]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: TNET: National predictions have 4-star Clemson QB target heading to Big Ten school
2
Jul 7, 2025, 2:36 PM
|
|
Why do all these QB targets for that class seem so small....one 5'11 190, another 6'0 198. Hopefully Reynolds pans out into a stud anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [3036]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: TNET: National predictions have 4-star Clemson QB target heading to Big Ten school
3
Jul 7, 2025, 3:32 PM
|
|
The fact that colleges continue to run mostly spread offenses and NFL teams starting to use spread too, you will no longer see the “old school” 6-5 QB. They are still around but height isn’t as much of an issue in spread offenses. Go Tigers!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6545]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: TNET: National predictions have 4-star Clemson QB target heading to Big Ten school
Jul 8, 2025, 2:20 PM
|
|
They don't have to be 6'5, but at least 6'2-'6'3 and over 200 lbs. Being able to shrug off would be sacks makes a big diff too. My ideal size would be around 6'2 215
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2998]
TigerPulse: 95%
33
|
Re: TNET: National predictions have 4-star Clemson QB target heading to Big Ten school
2
Jul 7, 2025, 4:49 PM
|
|
Love to have Mr. Houston in Clemson, and I do recognize that spread offenses don’t need 6-5 QBs, but I do like my quarterbacks a bit taller than 6-0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [982]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: TNET: National predictions have 4-star Clemson QB target heading to Big Ten school
3
Jul 7, 2025, 6:16 PM
|
|
I know lineman don't block straight up, but with 6'2" to 6'5" defensive lineman as well as your own line men blocking (see current commits at 6'5"-6'8"), anything less than than a 6'2" QB seems a bit short.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [64690]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 63904
Joined: 2007
|
Re: TNET: National predictions have 4-star Clemson QB target heading to Big Ten school
3
Jul 7, 2025, 7:16 PM
|
|
We do not need to keep hearing this and we don't need for it to be put in different places like something has changed. Nothing has changed, He's not a Clemson commit, talk about the ones that has committed to Clemson, we owe them our thoughts and comments, not the ones that chose to go somewhere else other than dear ole Clemson!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4840]
TigerPulse: 62%
37
|
I agree with you. Its all click bait.***
1
Jul 7, 2025, 8:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [373]
TigerPulse: 100%
16
|
Re: I agree with you. Its all click bait.***
1
Jul 7, 2025, 9:10 PM
|
|
Isn’t USC cycling out now? I have the confuse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [64690]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 63904
Joined: 2007
|
Re: I agree with you. Its all click bait.***
3
Jul 8, 2025, 1:09 AM
|
|
That's pretty easy to understand the confusion when the T-Net writers keep putting all the BS commitments of recruits that has committed to other schools on here over the ones that has held solid to their commitment for several years to Clemson. Our writers are finding it easier to give recruits that are committing to other schools as much or more space than they are the recruits that actually commit to Clemson over SEC and Big schools.
If they don't have any news about new commitments, find out what those that committed to Clemson a couple years ago and have stuck with Clemson, find out what they have been doing since their commitment. Ask them if they have been trying to recruit elite players to Clemson. Ask them about other elite recruits that they've tried to sway to Clemson. It would be better to read about that over all the BS talk about recruits that has committed elsewhere and seeing it plastered on T-Net. That BS causes me to question myself about why in the H E L L have I donated to what seems to be a multiple school, multiple conference athletic board for 18 straight years...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24727]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 24663
Joined: 2003
|
Yeah but where else can you see wedding photos of former Clemson players?***
Jul 8, 2025, 11:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24727]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 24663
Joined: 2003
|
Tigernet makes articles about everything that happens in the universe.
1
Jul 8, 2025, 11:30 PM
|
|
It's a bit much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 18
| visibility 4543
|
|
|
50
