|
Replies: 27
| visibility 300
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46599
Joined: 2012
|
New Story: Clemson vs. Georgia Tech prediction
Nov 14, 2014, 3:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Rock Defender [59]
TigerPulse: 81%
6
|
I Agree with Tony... 38-20 Clemson***
Nov 14, 2014, 3:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [59]
TigerPulse: 81%
6
|
OOPS - I Agree with Dutch... 38-20 Clemson******
Nov 14, 2014, 3:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9906]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
Posts: 11171
Joined: 2003
|
Forget 3rd down conversions. It is the routine going for...
Nov 14, 2014, 3:31 PM
|
|
it on 4th down that ofetn keeps the chains moving for TECH. hard to stop someone from getting 10 yards when they utilize all 4 downs. Clemson must make them pay for that philosophy and turn them over on downs when they go for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [59]
TigerPulse: 81%
6
|
Re: Forget 3rd down conversions. It is the routine going for...
Nov 14, 2014, 3:35 PM
|
|
Ga Tech is 9 for 12 on 4th down conversions. They are 8th in nation in success %. But, they are tied for 71st in the country in 4th down attempts. Guess who also has 12 attempts this year? Yep, Clemson.
12 attempts in 10 games is not that many. So, I don't think 4th down conversions will play much of a factor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 16363
Joined: 1998
|
My high school won a state title basically never punting ...
Nov 14, 2014, 6:55 PM
[ in reply to Forget 3rd down conversions. It is the routine going for... ] |
|
... the strategy of (almost) always going on 4th down is a calculated risk, but I agree that if you have faith in your running game it can be very discouraging to a defense to stop you with 3rd and 2 and know that your going to line up and probably get those 2 yards on 4th down every time until you score.
This is what Paul Johnson does ... particularly to lesser defenses.
Fortunately for us, our defense is good enough not to leave them with 3rd and 2 if we play our game.
3rd and 6 is a lot difference proposition ... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [101565]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 29892
Joined: 2005
|
Mike Patrick and Ed Cunningham
Nov 14, 2014, 3:32 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [371]
TigerPulse: 79%
16
|
Re: Mike Patrick and Ed Cunningham
Nov 14, 2014, 5:19 PM
|
|
I hear ya...mike Patrick always sounds like he's had about 5 too many drinks....and ed Cunningham is constantly sticking his foot in his mouth. Not my favorite announcers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2397]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Mike Patrick and Ed Cunningham
Nov 14, 2014, 8:38 PM
|
|
They are right up there with the "Un-Holy Trinity" of Palmer, Polluck, and Davis. Ugh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [139]
TigerPulse: 41%
11
|
Re: New Story: Clemson vs. Georgia Tech prediction
Nov 14, 2014, 3:35 PM
|
|
Let's correctly call our Oline and Special Teams what they are , terrible. Neither have improved in three years and the Oline maybe the worst one since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [434]
TigerPulse: 100%
17
|
Re: New Story: Clemson vs. Georgia Tech prediction
Nov 14, 2014, 3:58 PM
|
|
I thought your OLine was supposed to be one of scar's greater assets. One of the best in the SEC they say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [424]
TigerPulse: 100%
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [139]
TigerPulse: 41%
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [424]
TigerPulse: 100%
17
|
Re: You and tigermaven may want to learn about stats
Nov 14, 2014, 8:56 PM
|
|
A&M, Mizzou, Kentucky, Auburn, Tennessee...the list grows tomorrow chief.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [139]
TigerPulse: 41%
11
|
CCCCOOOOOOOOOTTTT
Nov 14, 2014, 10:13 PM
|
|
always a great response to facts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32778]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 15246
Joined: 2014
|
Re: CCCCOOOOOOOOOTTTT
Nov 14, 2014, 10:20 PM
|
|
no - you're a Cocklover = fact
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2293]
TigerPulse: 95%
32
|
Re: CCCCOOOOOOOOOTTTT
Nov 16, 2014, 2:01 PM
|
|
So all that aside, how many on here lost money on that final score? I did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [139]
TigerPulse: 41%
11
|
Re: CCCCOOOOOOOOOTTTT
Nov 18, 2014, 8:21 PM
|
|
It has been quite obvious for some time that you cannot point out Dabos obvious failures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3295]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
oh no! mike patrick & ed cunningham! might have to mute.***
Nov 14, 2014, 3:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [101565]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 29892
Joined: 2005
|
Re: oh no! mike patrick & ed cunningham! might have to mute.******
Nov 14, 2014, 3:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9788]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5464]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: New Story: Clemson vs. Georgia Tech prediction
Nov 14, 2014, 3:50 PM
|
|
GT's D-line is really thin and now starting DT Shawn Green is out. I see no reason why we shouldn't be able to run the football and get this offense firing on all cylinders tomorrow.
45-27 Clemson!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2397]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: New Story: Clemson vs. Georgia Tech prediction
Nov 14, 2014, 8:43 PM
|
|
Defense will give up some points, but WELCOME BACK DW! Just in time, because you can't beat Tech with just defense! Mike Williams celebrates DW's return with 3 TD catches.
41-23 Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [102386]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 98928
Joined: 2009
|
I've missed that game. Did we win?***
Nov 14, 2014, 5:42 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2770]
TigerPulse: 75%
33
|
Re: I've missed that game. Did we win?***
Nov 14, 2014, 9:09 PM
|
|
I caught it too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [102386]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 98928
Joined: 2009
|
45 17 Clemson***
Nov 14, 2014, 5:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [202]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
Re: New Story: Clemson vs. Georgia Tech prediction
Nov 14, 2014, 6:36 PM
|
|
We have the opportunity to put up 50 if we take care of the ball...So I will go with that....
50-19 Clemson!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20888]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 15329
Joined: 2010
|
D-Wat is healthy & we win. If not, we lose.
Nov 14, 2014, 9:39 PM
|
|
Defense will take care of business but will need help and cannot be on field the whole game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 27
| visibility 300
|
|
|
50
